Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:27:50.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hickey Raymond (ed.) 2012. Areal Features of the Anglophone World Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. viii+500.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2013

Peter Trudgill*
Affiliation:
Department of Foreign Languages University of Agder, Norway

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Auer, Anita & Gonzalez Diaz, Victorina. 2005. Eighteenth-century prescriptivism in English: a re-evaluation of its effects on actual language usage. Multilingua 24: 317341.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droeschel, Yvonne. 2011. Lingua Franca English: The role of simplification and transfer. Berne: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, Mercedes. 2007. English in Switzerland: Inherent variation in a non-native speech community. Fribourg: University of Fribourg.Google Scholar
Evans, Nick & Levinson, Stephen. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5): 429492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filppula, Markku, Juhani, Klemola, Heli, Paulasto (eds). 2009. Vernacular universals and language contacts: evidence from varieties of English and beyond. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elisabeth & Trudgill, Peter. 2006. Predicting the past: Dialect archaeology and Australian English rhoticity. English World-Wide 27: 235246.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Haspelmath, M., König, E., Oesterreicher, W. & Raible, W. (eds), Language typology and language universals, 14921510. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardisation. Journal of sociolinguistics 5: 530555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1998. Social mobility and the decline of multiple negation in Early Modern English. In Fisiak, J. & Krygier, M. (eds), Advances in English historical linguistics, 263291. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 2000. Standardization and the language of early statutes. In Wright, L. (ed.), The development of Standard English 1300–1800: Theories, descriptions, conflicts, 117130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skjekkeland, Martin. 1997. Dei norske dialektane: tradisjonelle særdrag i jamføring med skriftmåla. Kristiansand: Norwegian Academic Press.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Kortmann, Bernd. 2009. Vernacular universals and angloversals in a typological perspective. In Filppula, M., Klemola, J. & Paulasto, H. (eds), Vernacular universals and language contacts, 3353. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: what it isn't. In Bex, T. & Watts, R. J. (eds), Standard English: The widening debate, 117128. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2008. English dialect “default singulars”, was vs. were, Verner's Law, and Germanic dialects. Journal of English Linguistics 36(4): 341353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2011. Standard average European. In Kortmann, B. & van der Auwera, J. (eds), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide, 291306. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar