Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:49:58.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What Should We Be Asking of Informed Consent?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Ellen Wright Clayton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Independent Articles: Commentary
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 48 , Issue 1: LawSeq: Building a Sound Legal Foundation for Translating Genomics into Clinical Application , Spring 2020 , pp. 185 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Simon, C.M., et al., “Active Choice but Not Too Active: Public Perspectives on Biobank Consent Models,” Genetics in Medicine 13, no. 9 (2011): 821–31; Clayton, E.W., “The Unbearable Requirement of Informed Consent,” American Journal of Bio-ethics 19, no. 5 (May 2019): 19–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beskow, L.M. and Weinfurt, K. P., “Exploring Understanding of ‘Understanding’: The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension,” American Journal of Bioethics 19, no. 5 (2019): 6–18; Gillies, K. A. et al., “Patient Reported Measures of Informed Consent for Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review,” PLoS One 13, no. 6 (2018): e0199775; Montalvo, W. and Larson, E., “Participant Comprehension of Research for Which They Volunteer: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 46, no. 6 (2014): 423–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, E. et al., “From ‘Informed’ to ‘Engaged’ Consent: Risks and Obligations in Consent for Participation in a Health Data Repository,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48, no. 1 (2020): 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldinger, C.E. et al., “Returning Aggregate Results of Clinical Trials: Empirical Data of Patient Preferences,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2, no. 6 (2018): 356–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, C., “Enduring and Emerging Challenges of Informed Consent,” New England Journal of Medicine 372, no. 9 (2015): 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, L.M. et al., “Just Compensation: A No-Fault Proposal for Research-Related Injuries,” Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2, no. 3 (2015): 6456–68.Google Scholar
“NIH Data Sharing Policies,” 2019, available at <https://www.nlm.nih.gov/NIHbmic/nih_data_sharing_policies.html> (last visited February 11, 2020).+(last+visited+February+11,+2020).>Google Scholar
Clayton, E.W. et al., “A Systematic Literature Review of Individuals' Perspectives on Privacy and Genetic Information in the United States,” PLoS One 13, no. 10 (2018): e0204417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, C. et al. “Broad Consent for Research with Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions,” American Journal of Bio-ethics 15, no. 9 (2015): 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 CFR 46 Part A (2019); Clayton, E. W. and Malin, B.A., “Assessing Risks to Privacy in Biospecimen Research,” in Bierer, B.A., Lynch, H.F., Cohen, I. Glenn, and Rivera, S.M., eds., Specimen Science: Ethical and Policy Implications (Boston: MIT Press, 2017) 143–158.Google Scholar
Faden, R.R. et al., “An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure from Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics,” Hastings Center Report Special 43, no. S1 (2013): S16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, C.H., “Effective Engagement Requires Trust and Being Trustworthy,” Medical Care 56, no. 10 Suppl 1 (2018): S6; Yarborough, M. et al., “Relationships Hold the Key to Trustworthy and Productive Translational Science: Recommendations for Expanding Community Engagement in Biomedical Research,” Clinical and Translational Science 6, no. 4 (2013): 310–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, D. J., Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Klitzman, R., “‘Members of the Same Club’: Challenges and Decisions Faced by US IRBs in Identifying and Managing Conflicts of Interest,” PLoS One 6, no. 7 (2011): e22796.Google Scholar
45 CFR § 46.111(a)(2)(2019).Google Scholar