Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:25:23.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thinking About AIDS and Stigma: A Psychologist’s Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Gregory M. Herek
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As Jonathan Mann observed, the problem of AIDS-related stigma is inextricably bound to issues of health, human rights, and the law. Such stigma translates into feelings of fear and hostility directed at people with HIV. It finds expression in avoidance and ostracism of people with HIV, discrimination and violence against them, and public support for punitive policies and laws that restrict civil liberties while hindering AIDS prevention efforts. Being the target of stigma inflicts pain, isolation, and hardship on many people with HIV, while the desire to avoid it deters some from being tested for HIV, seeking treatment, or practicing risk-reduction.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , Winter 2002 , pp. 594 - 607
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mann, J., “Preface,” The Impact of Homophobia and Other Social Biases on AIDS (San Francisco: Public Media Center, 1996): at 3, available at <http://www.publicmediacenter.org/pdfs/stigma.html>.Google Scholar
The category of “people with HIV” includes people diagnosed with AIDS as well as those who are asymptomatic. In the present article, I generally frame the discussion in terms of people with HIV The exception is in my discussion of some public opinion data and some specific incidents that refer specifically to people with AIDS.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M., “Illness, Stigma, and AIDS,” in Costa, P.T. Jr., and VandenBos, G.R., eds., Psychological Aspects of Serious Illness: Chronic Conditions, Fatal Diseases, and Clinical Care (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1990): 107–50; Herek, G.M. and Glunt, E.K., “An Epidemic of Stigma: Public Reactions to AIDS,” American Psychologist, 43 (1988): 886–91; Chesney, M.A. and Smith, A.W., “Critical Delays in HIV Testing and Care: The Potential Role of Stigma,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1162–74.Google Scholar
My discussion provides only a brief and somewhat idiosyncratic introduction to social psychological thinking about stigma and HIV. Readers who desire additional information about stigma in general will find the following sources helpful: Goffman, E., Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1963); Crocker, J. Major, B., and Steele, C., “Social Stigma,” in Gilbert, D.T. Fiske, S.T., and Lindzey, G., eds., The Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 2, 4th ed. (Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1998): 504–53; Jones, E.E. et al., Social Stigma: The Psychology of Marked Relationships (New York: W.H. Freeman, 1984); Link, B.G. and Phelan, J.C., “Conceptualizing Stigma,” Annual Review of Sociology, 27 (2001): 363–85. For more detailed discussions of HIV-related stigma, see the papers in Herek, G.M., ed., “AIDS and Stigma,” a thematic issue of American Behavioral Scientist, 42, no. 7 (1999).Google Scholar
The source for my comments about the etymology of stigma is the Oxford English Dictionary (1971 edition).Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (1971): at 954.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Goffman, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
Duckitt, J.H., The Social Psychology of Prejudice (New York: Praeger, 1992): at 7–24.Google Scholar
Id. at 9.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1980); Eagly, A.H. and Chaiken, S., eds., The Psychology of Attitudes (Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993); Ajzen, I., “Nature and Operation of Attitudes,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52 (2001): 27–58; Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior (Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975).Google Scholar
Eagly, and Chaiken, , supra note 11; Ajzen, and Fishbein, , supra note 11.Google Scholar
Ajzen, and Fishbein, , supra note 11; Heider, F., The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1958).Google Scholar
Scambler, G., Epilepsy (London: Routledge, 1989): at 56–57. I am grateful to Scott Burris for making me aware of Scambler’s work.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. et al., “AIDS and Stigma: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda,” AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 13, no. 1 (1998): 36–47.Google Scholar
Mann, J.M. Tarantola, D.J.M., and Netter, T.W., eds., AIDS in the World (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992); Panos Institute, The 3rd Epidemic: Repercussions of the Fear of AIDS (Budapest: Panos Institute, 1990); Aggleton, P., HIV and AIDS-Related Somatization, Discrimination and Denial: Research Studies From Uganda and India (Geneva: UNAIDS, 2000); Goldin, C.S., “Stigmatization and AIDS: Critical Issues in Public Health,” Social Science and Medicine, 39 (1994): 1359–66; Malcolm, A. et al. “HIV-Related Stigmatization and Discrimination: Its Forms and Contexts,” Critical Public Health, 8 (1998): 347–70.Google Scholar
For more extensive discussion of how AIDS-related stigma has been enacted, see Herek, , supra note 3; Herek, and Glunt, , supra note 3; National Association of People with AIDS [NAPWA], HIV in America: A Profile of the Challenges Facing Americans Living with HIV (Washington, D.C.: NAPWA, 1992).Google Scholar
Gielen, A.C. et al., “Women’s Disclosure of HIV Status: Experiences of Mistreatment and Violence in an Urban Setting,” Women and Health, 25, no. 3 (1997): 19–31; Klitzman, R., Being Positive: The Lives of Men and Women with HIV (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1997); Zierler, S. et al., “Violence Victimization After HIV Infection in a U.S. Probability Sample of Adult Patients in Primary Care,” American Journal of Public Health, 90 (2000): 208–15; NAPWA, supra note 17; Page, S., “Accommodating Persons with AIDS: Acceptance and Rejection in Rental Situations,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29 (1999): 261–70; Fife, B.L. and Wright, E.R., “The Dimensionality of Stigma: A Comparison of Its Impact on the Self of Persons with HIV/AIDS and Cancer,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41 (2000): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gostin, L.O., “The AIDS Litigation Project: A National Review of Court and Human Rights Commission Decisions, Part I: The Social Impact of AIDS,” JAMA, 263 (1990): 1961–70; Gostin, L.O., “The AIDS Litigation Project: A National Review of Court and Human Rights Commission Decisions, Part II: Discrimination,” JAMA, 263 (1990): 2086–93; Gostin, L.O. and Webber, D.W., “The AIDS Litigation Project: HIV/AIDS in the Courts in the 1990s, Part 1,” AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 12 (1997): 105–21; Gostin, L.O. and Webber, D., “The AIDS Litigation Project: HIV/AIDS in the Courts in the 1990s, Part 2,” AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 13 (1998): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, S.M. and Arkin, E.B., AIDS Information Monitor: A Summary of National Public Opinion Surveys on AIDS: 1983 Through 1986 (Burlingame, California: Down There Press, 1988); Singer, E. and Rogers, T.F., “Public Opinion and AIDS,” AIDS and Public Policy Journal, 1 (1986): 1–13; Rogers, T.F. Singer, E., and Imperio, J., “AIDS: An Update,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (1993): 92–114; Herek, G.M. and Glunt, E.K., “AIDS-Related Attitudes in the United States: A Preliminary Conceptualization,” The Journal of Sex Research, 28 (1991): 99–123; Herek, , supra note 3.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. Capitanio, J.P., and Widaman, K.F., “HIV-Related Stigma and Knowledge in the United States: Prevalence and Trends, 1991–1999,” American Journal of Public Health, 92 (2002): 371–77, at 372–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. at 372.Google Scholar
Weiner, B., “AIDS from an Attributional Perspective,” in Pryor, J.B. and Reeder, G.D., eds., The Social Psychology of HIV Infection (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993): 287–302.Google Scholar
Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21, at 373.Google Scholar
Lentine, D.A. et al., “HIV-Related Knowledge and Stigma — United States, 2000,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 49 (2000): 1062–64.Google Scholar
For more findings from the survey, see Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21. See also Capitanio, J.P. and Herek, G.M., “AIDS-Related Stigma and Attitudes Toward Injecting Drug Users Among Black and White Americans,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1148–61; Herek, G.M. and Capitanio, J.P., “AIDS Stigma and Sexual Prejudice,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1130–47.Google Scholar
In his classic analysis of stigma, for example, Goffman paid relatively little notice to how a particular characteristic or condition comes to be stigmatized in the first place, taking this to be largely a given, a part of the social structure. Instead, he focused mainly on how stigma affects face-to-face encounters.Google Scholar
E.g., Goffman, , supra note 4; Jones, et al., supra note 4.Google Scholar
Weiner, , supra note 23.Google Scholar
E.g., Capitanio, and Herek, , supra note 26; Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
E.g., Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Blake, and Arkin, , supra note 20.Google Scholar
Goffman, , supra note 4; Jones, et al., Supra note 4.Google Scholar
Herek, , supra note 3.Google Scholar
Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21. For analyses of how beliefs about casual contact interact with prejudice against people with HIV, see Herek, G.M., “The Social Construction of Attitudes: Functional Consensus and Divergence in the U.S. Public’s Reactions to AIDS,” in Maio, G.R. and Olson, J.M., eds., Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000): 325–64; Herek, G.M. and Capitanio, J.P., “Symbolic Prejudice or Fear of Infection? A Functional Analysis of AIDS-Related Stigma Among Heterosexual Adults,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 20 (1998): 230–241; Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Goffman, , supra note 4, at 4.Google Scholar
Id.; Jones, et al., supra note 4.Google Scholar
Goffman, , supra note 4, at 28.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id. at 4.Google Scholar
Klitzman, , supra note 18.Google Scholar
Goffman, , supra note 4, at 28–31.Google Scholar
Poindexter, C.C. and Linsk, N.L., “HIV-Related Stigma in a Sample of HIV-Affected Older Female African American Caregivers,” Social Work, 44 (1999): 46–61; van der Straten, A. et al., “Managing HIV Among Serodiscordant Heterosexual Couples: Serostatus, Stigma and Sex,” AIDS Care, 10 (1998): 533–48; Snyder, M. Omoto, A.M., and Crain, A.L., “Punished for Their Good Deeds: Stigmatization of AIDS Volunteers,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1175–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, , supra note 35; Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 35; Pryor, J.B. Reeder, G.D., and Landau, S., “A Social-Psychological Analysis of HIV-Related Stigma: A Two-Factor Theory,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1193–211.Google Scholar
See generally Sontag, S., Illness as Metaphor (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1978); Sontag, S., AIDS and Its Metaphors (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1989).Google Scholar
Goldin, , supra note 16; Malcolm, et al., supra note 16; Mann, Tarantola, , and Netter, , supra note 16. Panos Institute, supra note 16; Sabatier, R., Blaming Others: Prejudice, Race and Worldwide AIDS (Philadelphia: New Society, 1988).Google Scholar
Herek, , supra note 35; Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Capitanio, and Herek, , supra note 26; Fullilove, M.T. and Fullilove, R.E.I., “Stigma as an Obstacle to AIDS Action,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1117–29.Google Scholar
For a review, see Brown, L. Trujillo, L., and Macintyre, K., Interventions to Reduce HIV/AIDS Stigma: What Have We Learned? (New York: Population Council, 2001).Google Scholar
The total 1999 sample included 666 respondents who were recontacted after participating in a similar 1997 survey as well as 669 new respondents. Some data from the 1999 interviews with the recontacted participants have been reported elsewhere (Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21). Respondents were included in the present analyses only if they identified themselves as heterosexual in a screening question. Because of missing data for some variables, the sample size for the correlation coefficients shown in Table 1 ranged from 1,197 to 1,258. For the regression analysis, the sample size was 1,185. Details about the sampling methods, response rates, interview procedures, and other aspects of the methodology, including the wording of individual items, are reported in Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21; Herek, G.M., “Gender Gaps in Public Opinion About Lesbians and Gay Men,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 66 (2002): 40–66; Herek, G.M., “Heterosexuals’ Attitudes Toward Bisexual Men and Women in the United States,” Journal of Sex Research, 39 (2002): In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This index was computed by counting the number of stigmatizing responses each person gave to nine different items designed to measure various aspects of AIDS-related stigma. The items assessed the extent to which respondents felt angry, disgusted, and afraid of people with AIDS; would avoid interacting with a person with AIDS in an office; would have their child avoid an HIV-infected schoolmate; would refrain from shopping at a neighborhood grocery store whose owner had AIDS; supported quarantining people with AIDS; believed that the names of those with AIDS should be made public; and believed that those who were infected through sex or drug use got what they deserved. More information about this measure is reported in Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21.Google Scholar
The variables listed in Table 1 were derived from a series of exploratory analyses with a larger number of variables. The variables of marital status, number of children, race, and political party affiliation displayed negligible correlations with AIDS stigma and were dropped from the analysis. A “negligible” correlation was operationally defined as r <0.10 (i.e., the variable shared less than 1 percent of variance with the AIDS stigma index).Google Scholar
The coefficients can potentially range from −1.00 to +1.00, with values near zero indicating little or no association between the two variables and values near −1.00 or +1.00 indicating a strong association. The sign of the coefficient indicates the direction of the relationship. A positive coefficient means that as values of one variable increased, values of the other also increased; a negative coefficient means that as values of one variable increased, values of the other decreased.Google Scholar
See generally Adorno, T.W. et al., The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1950); Altemeyer, B., Enemies of Freedom: Understanding Right-Wing Authoritarianism (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1988).Google Scholar
A correlation coefficient less than r = 0.14 means that the variable shares only about 1 percent of its variance with AIDS stigma scores. These associations are statistically significant mainly because the sample for the survey was relatively large, but they have little substantive importance in the present analysis.Google Scholar
Like correlation coefficients, values for β can potentially range from −1.00 to +1.00, with values near zero indicating that the variable has little or no predictive power and values near −1.00 or +1.00 indicating that the variable helps to explain a substantial amount of variation in AIDS stigma scores. As with correlation coefficients, the sign of β (positive or negative) indicates the direction of the relationship (see note 54, supra).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, C.E., The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. at 13−98.Google Scholar
Id. at 5, 101–225. See also Rosenberg, C.E., “Disease and Social Order in America: Perceptions and Expectations,” in Fee, E. and Fox, D.M., eds., AIDS: The Burdens of History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988): 12–32.Google Scholar
Herek, Capitanio, , and Widaman, , supra note 21.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M., “The HIV Epidemic and Public Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men,” in Levine, M.P. Nardi, P., and Gagnon, J., eds., In Changing Times: Gay Men and Lesbians Encounter HIV/AIDS (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997): 191–218; Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 26, at 1140–42.Google Scholar
See generally Thomas, S.B. and Quinn, S.C., “The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: Implications for HIV Education and AIDS Risk Education Programs in the Black Community,” American Journal of Public Health, 81 (1991): 1498–505; Turner, P.A., I Heard It Through the Grapevine: Rumor in African-American Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herek, G.M. and Capitanio, J.P., “Conspiracies, Contagion, and Compassion: Trust and Public Reactions to AIDS,” AIDS Education and Prevention, 6 (1994): 365–75, at 370–72.Google Scholar
Cole, S.W. et al., “Elevated Physical Health Risk Among Gay Men Who Conceal Their Homosexual Identity,” Health Psychology, 15 (1996): 243–51; Cole, S.W. Kemeny, M.E., and Taylor, S.E., “Social Identity and Physical Health: Accelerated HIV Progression in Rejection-Sensitive Gay Men,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72 (1997): 320–35; Herek, G.M., “Why Tell If You’re Not Asked? Self-Disclosure, Intergroup Contact, and Heterosexuals’ Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men,” in Herek, G.M. Jobe, J., and Carney, R., eds., Out in Force: Sexual Orientation and the Military (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996): 197–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allport, G.W., The Nature of Prejudice (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1954): at 261–82.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T.F. and Tropp, L.R., “Does Intergroup Contact Reduce Prejudice: Recent Meta-Analytic Findings,” in Oskamp, S., ed., Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination (Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000): 93–114.Google Scholar
Herek, G.M. and Capitanio, J.P., “‘Some of My Best Friends’: Intergroup Contact, Concealable Stigma, and Heterosexuals’ Attitudes Toward Gay Men and Lesbians,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (1996): 412–24; Herek, G.M. and Glunt, E.K., “Interpersonal Contact and Heterosexuals’ Attitudes Toward Gay Men: Results from a National Survey,” Journal of Sex Research, 30 (1993): 239–44; Schneider, W. and Lewis, I.A. “The Straight Story on Homosexuality and Gay Rights,” Public Opinion, February-March 1984, at 16–20, 59-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbert, B. Sumser, J., and Maguire, B.T., “The Impact of Who You Know and Where You Live on Opinions About AIDS and Health Care,” Social Science and Medicine, 32 (1991): 677–81; Henry, K. Campbell, S., and Willenbring, K., “A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Variables Impacting on AIDS-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Among Employees of a Minnesota Teaching Hospital,” AIDS Education and Prevention, 2 (1990): 36–47; Herek, G.M. and Capitanio, J.P., “AIDS Stigma and Contact with Persons with AIDS: The Effects of Personal and Vicarious Contact,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27 (1997): 1–36; Zimet, G.D., “Attitudes of Teenagers Who Know Someone with AIDS,” Psychological Reports, 70 (1992): 1169–70; Zimet, G.D. et al., “Knowing Someone with AIDS: The Impact on Adolescents,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 16 (1991): 287–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“From Hero to Crusader,” Newsweek, November 18, 1991, at 69.Google Scholar
Montville, L., “Like One of the Family,” Sports Illustrated, November 18, 1991, 44–45.Google Scholar
Kalichman, S.C. et al., “Earvin ‘Magic’ Johnson’s HIV Serostatus Disclosure: Effects on Men’s Perceptions of AIDS,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61 (1993): 887–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannemeyer, W., Shadow in the Land: Homosexuality in America (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1989): at 217–23. Allan Brandt’s study of the history of venereal disease in the United States probably offers a better model for symbolic AIDS stigma than Rosenberg’s history of cholera. See Brandt, A.M., No Magic Bullet: A Social History of Venereal Disease in the United States Since 1880 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Dannemeyer, , supra note 74; Cameron, P., Exposing the AIDS Scandal (Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House, 1988). See also Bailey, W.A., “The Importance of HIV Prevention Programming to the Lesbian and Gay Community,” in Herek, G.M. and Greene, B., eds., AIDS, Identity, and Community: The HIV Epidemic and Lesbians and Gay Men (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1995): 210–25.Google Scholar
Stevenson, M.R., “Promoting Tolerance for Homosexuality: An Evaluation of Intervention Strategies,” The Journal of Sex Research, 25 (1988): 500–11; Herek, G.M., “Stigma, Prejudice, and Violence Against Lesbians and Gay Men,” in Gonsiorek, J.C. and Weinrich, J.D., eds., Homosexuality: Research Implications for Public Policy (Newbury Park, California: Sage, 1991): 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See generally Stevenson, , supra note 76; Herek, , supra note 76.Google Scholar
See id.Google Scholar
Herek, and Capitanio, , supra note 69.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, and Tropp, , supra note 68.Google Scholar
The stigma associated with injecting drug use is quite different from that associated with homosexuality. The American public shows growing acceptance of its gay and lesbian members and is increasingly willing to support their civil rights and liberties in many areas. Whereas homosexuality is widely considered to be irrelevant to an individual’s ability to function effectively in society, injecting drug use is generally considered a social evil and IDUs are regarded very negatively. See Capitanio, and Herek, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
See generally Burris, S., “Studying the Legal Management of HIV-Related Stigma,” American Behavioral Scientist, 42 (1999): 1229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, , supra note 82, at 1235. Regarding ballot initiatives that would have severely curtailed the civil liberties of people with HIV, see Krieger, N. and Lashof, J.C., “AIDS, Policy Analysis, and the Electorate: The Role of Schools of Public Health,” American Journal of Public Health, 78 (1988): 411–15; Herek, G.M. and Glunt, E.K., “Public Attitudes Toward AIDS-Related Issues in the United States,” in Pryor, J.B. and Reeder, G.D., eds., The Social Psychology of HIV Infection (Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993): 229–61.Google Scholar
See, e.g., “Interventions to Prevent HIV Risk Behaviors,” NIH Consensus Statement, 15, no. 2 (1997): 1–41; Miller, H.G. Turner, C.F., and Moses, L.E., eds., AIDS: The Second Decade (Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Burris, , supra note 83; Bailey, , supra note 75; Heredia, C., “S.F.’s HIV Fight May Be Too Sexy: Feds to Review City’s Prevention Programs,” San Francisco Chronicle, November 16, 2001, at A25; Ornstein, C., “Explicit Ads Prompt a Review of U.S. AIDS Prevention Grants,” Los Angeles Times, January 4, 2002, at A1.Google Scholar
“Interventions to Prevent HIV Risk Behaviors,” supra note 84; Des Jarlais, D.C., “Research, Politics, and Needle Exchange,” American Journal of Public Health, 90 (2000): 1392–94.Google Scholar
For example, see Epstein, S., Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996).Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, R.G., “Sexuality, Culture, and Power in HIV/AIDS Research,” Annual Review of Anthropology, 30 (2001): 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, , supra note 1, at 3.Google Scholar