Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:16:19.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Rightful Place for Public Health in American Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Wendy E. Parmet  and
Anthony Robbins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The practice of law has changed greatly since the days when judges based decisions on the maxim salus populi suprema lex, and Oliver Wendell Holmes disagreed, noting that “experience” has been the “life of the law.” In the intervening years, the profession has followed Holmes and the legal realists in recognizing that the law does not exist in a vacuum. It is a human endeavor, molded by experiences and filled with human consequences. Today, lawyers, jurists, and legal scholars everywhere on the political spectrum recognize the importance of social context, history, and a variety of non-legal disciplines, and non-legal insights to the intelligent practice of the law Unfortunately, in rejecting the old maxims, the legal profession also lost sight of the fundamental truth of salus populi suprema lex, Latin for “the health of the people is the highest law” - namely, it has lost sight of the truth that a population’s health is a critical part of law’s social context. One of the consequences of this is that the profession has failed to include public health - the study of the causes and prevention of disease, disability, and death in populations - among the non-legal disciplines regularly incorporated into legal analysis and routinely taught to all would-be lawyers. It is time to correct this oversight.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 302 - 304
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Holmes, O.W., “The Path of the Law,” Harvard Law Review, 10 (1897): 457–78, at 469.Google Scholar
Holmes, O.W., The Common Law (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, 1967): at 1.Google Scholar
See Coggan, D. Rose, G. Barker, D.J.P., Epidemiology for the Uninitiated (London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1997). This 70-page book provides a fine introduction to the methods of epidemiology.Google Scholar
Goodman, R.A.et al., “Other Branches of Science Are Necessary to Form a Lawyer: Teaching Public Health in Law Schools,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30, no. 2 (2002): 298–301. This commentary persuasively explains why all law students should have the opportunity to take a course in public health law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northeastern University School of Law and Tufts University School of Medicine began accepting students in a dual degree J.D./M.P.H. program in September 2001.Google Scholar
Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624, 654 (1998).Google Scholar
Id. at 657, 573–74 (Rehnquist, C.J., dissenting).Google Scholar
Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001).Google Scholar
With a grant from the Bauman Foundation, faculty members at Northeastern University School of Law and Tufts University School of Medicine have created a Public Health Advocacy Institute, where a project on public health literacy will develop materials to introduce public health aspects of currently studied cases into existing law school courses.Google Scholar