Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:54:17.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Return of Research Results: How Should Research Results Be Handled?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Knoppers, B. M. Joly, Y. Simard, J. Durocher, F., “The Emergence of an Ethical Duty to Disclose Genetic Research Results: International Perspectives,” European Journal of Human Genetics 14, no. 11 (2006): 11701178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravitsky, V. Wilfond, B. S., “Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants,” American Journal of Bioethics 6, no. 6 (2006): 817.Google Scholar
Wolf, S. M. et al, “Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 2 (2008): 219248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Cancer Institute - Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research, Workshop on Release of Research Results to Participants in Biospecimen Studies, July 8–9, 2010, Bethesda, MD, 2011.Google Scholar
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group, “Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants,” Circulation Cardiovascular Genetics 3, no. 6 (2010): 574580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
This consensus statement was addressed during the National Institutes of Health Working Group Meeting IV, Working Group on Managing Incidental Findings and Research Results in Genomic Biobanks & Archives, Bethesda, May 20, 2011.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Guidelines on Human Biobanks and Genetic Research Databases, 2009, at Article 1.H, available at <http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/47/44054609.pdf> (last visited September 1, 2011).+(last+visited+September+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
European Society of Human Genetics, “Genetic Testing and Common Disorders in a Public Health Framework - Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics,” European Journal of Human Genetics 19, no. 4 (2011): 377381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, J. E. Palomaki, G. E., “ACCE: A Model Process for Evaluating Data on Emerging Genetic Tests”? in Khoury, M. Little, J. Burke, W., eds., Human Genome Epidemiology: A Scientific Foundation for Using Genetic Information to Improve Health and Prevent Disease (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003): At 217233.Google Scholar
Public Population Project in Genomics (P3G), available at <www.p3g.org> (last visited September 1, 2011).+(last+visited+September+1,+2011).>Google Scholar
Sweden, , Biobanks in Medical Care Act (SFS 2002:297) and the proposed revision of the Act (SOU 2010:81).Google Scholar
Spain, , Law 14/2007, of 3 July, on Biomedical Research.Google Scholar
Hayeems, R. Z. Miller, F. A. Li, L. Bytautas, J. P., “Not So Simple: A Quasi-experimental Study of How Researchers Adjudicate Genetic Research Results,” European Journal of Human Genetics 19, no. 7 (2011): 740747.Google Scholar
Bredenoord, A. L. Kroes, H. Y. Cuppen, E. Parker, M. van Delden, J. J. M., “Disclosure of Individual Genetic Data to Research Participants: The Debate Reconsidered,” Trends in Genetics 27, no. 2 (2011): 4147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barabasi, A., “Network Medicine – From Obesity to the ‘Diseasome,’” New England Journal of Medicine 357, no. 4 (2007): 404407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Hayeems, et al, supra note 13.Google Scholar