We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
References
1
American with Disabilities Act of 1990, 104 Stat. 328, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (1994).Google Scholar
2
Sutton v. United Airlines, Inc., 119 S. Ct. 2139 (1999).Google Scholar
3
Albertson's, Inc. v. Kirkingburg, 119 S. Ct. 2162 (1999).Google Scholar
4
Murphy v. United Parcel Service, 119 S. Ct. 2133 (1999).Google Scholar
Under the False Claims Act's qui tam provisions, a whistleblower is entitled to a portion of whatever penalties are won by the government. See 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. (1994).Google Scholar
4
Taylor, M., “Jury Convicts Two in Columbia Fraud Case,” Modern Healthcare, July 5, 1999, at 4.Google Scholar
See Taylor, M., “Will Healthcare Do Time for Convictions? Hospital Groups Seek Medicare Relief as Industry Anticipates Impact of Latest Fraud Verdicts,” Modern Healthcare, July 12, 1999, at 2.Google Scholar