Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:06:14.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Living Organ Donation Near and at the End of Life: Drawing and Re-Drawing the Boundaries Around Permissible Practices in Organ Donation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Ana S. Iltis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Independent Articles: Commentary
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 47 , Issue 1: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons , Spring 2019 , pp. 123 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Veatch, R., “Transplanting Hearts after Death Measured by Cardiac Criteria: The Challenge to the Dead Donor Rule,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 3 (2010): 313-329; S. J. Youngner et al., “Ethical, Psychosocial, and Public Policy Implications of Procuring Organs from Non — Heart-Beating Cadaver Donors,” Journal of the American Medical Association 269, no. 21 (1993): 2769-2774; J. Menikoff, “The Importance of Being Dead: Non-Heart-Beating Organ Donation,” Issues in Law and Medicine 18, no. 1 (2002): 3-20; Institute of Medicine, Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Medical and Ethical Issues in Procurement (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1997); Institute of Medicine, Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation: Practice and Protocols (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000); J.M. DuBois et al., “When Organ Donors are Still Patients: Is Premortem Use of Heparin Ethically Acceptable?” American Journal of Critical Care 16, no. 4 (2007): 396-400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veatch, supra note 1; Boucek, M. et al., “Pediatric Heart Transplantation after Declaration of Cardiocirculatory Death,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 7 (2008): 709-714; R.D. Truog et al., “The Dead Donor Rule and Organ Transplantation,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 7 (2008): 674-675; J.L. Bernat, “The Boundaries of Organ Donation after Circulatory Death,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 7 (2008): 669-671; R.M. Veatch, “Donating Hearts after Cardiac Death — Reversing the Irreversible,” New England Journal of Medicine 359, no. 7 (2008): 672-673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veatch 2008, supra note 2; Bernat, J.L, “How the Distinction between ‘Irreversible’ and ‘Permanent’ Illuminates Circulatory–Respiratory Death Determination,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 3 (2010): 242-255; Uniform Determination of Death Act 1980, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, L.F. and Thistlethwaite, J. R., “Living Donation by Individuals with Life-Limiting Conditions,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 1 (2019): 112-122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemens, K.K. et al., “Psychosocial Health of Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review,” American Journal of Transplantation 6, no. 12 (2006): 2965-2977; M.A. Dew et al., “Psychosocial Outcomes 3 to 10 Years After Donation in the Adult to Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL),” Transplantation 100, no. 6 (2016): 1257-1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross and Thistlethwaite, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Cherry, M.J., “Organ Vouchers and Barter Markets: Saving Lives, Reducing Suffering, and Trading in Human Organs,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42, no. 5 (2017): 503-517; L.F. Ross et al., “Ethical and Logistical Issues Raised by the Advanced Donation Program ‘Pay it Forward’ Scheme,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 42, no. 5 (2017): 518-536; S.J. Kerstein, “Kidney Vouchers and Inequity in Transplantation,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42, no. 5 (2017): 559-574; J.J. Koplin, “The Body as Gift, Commodity, or Something in Between: Ethical Implications of Advanced Kidney Donation,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42, no. 5 (2017): 575-596; J. S. Taylor, “From Directed Donation to Kidney Sale: Does the Argument Hold Up?” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42, no. 5 (2017): 597-614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross and Thisthlewaite, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Shewmon, D. A., “Constructing the Death Elephant: A Synthetic Paradigm Shift for the Definition, Criteria, and Tests for Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 3 (2010): 256-298; S.K. Shah and F.G. Miller, “Can We Handle the Truth? Legal Fictions in the Determination of Death,” American Journal of Law & Medicine 36, no. 4 (2010): 540-585; S.K. Shah, “Piercing the Veil: The Limits of Brain Death as a Legal Fiction,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 48 (2014): 301-346; R. M. Veatch, “Killing by Organ Procurement: Brain-Based Death and Legal Fictions,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40, no. 3 (2015): 289-311; R.D. Truog and J.C. Fackler, “Rethinking Brain Death,” Critical Care Medicine 20, no. 12 (1992): 1705-1713; N. Fost, “Reconsidering the Dead Donor Rule: Is it Important that Organ Donors be Dead?” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14, no. 3 (2004): 249-260; M.L. Condic, “Determination of Death: A Scientific Perspective on Biological Integration,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41, no. 3 (2016): 257-278; D.A. Shewmon, “The Brain and Somatic Integration: Insights into the Standard Biological Rationale for Equating ‘Brain Death’ with Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (2001): 457–478; E.C. Brugger, “Are Brain Dead Individuals Dead? Grounds for Reasonable Doubt,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 41, no. 3 (2016): 329-350; M. Collins, “Reevaluating the Dead Donor Rule,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 2 (2010): 154-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khushf, G., “A Matter of Respect: A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule and of a ‘Whole-Brain’ Criterion for Determination of Death,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35, no. 3 (2010): 330-364; F.G. Miller and R. D. Truog, Death, Dying, and Organ Transplantation: Reconstructing Medical Ethics at the End of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D. and Savulescu, J., “Should We Allow Organ Donation Euthanasia? Alternatives for Maximizing the Number and Quality of Organs for Transplantation,” Bioethics 26, no. 1 (2012): 32-48; J. A.M. Bollen et al., “Euthanasia through Living Organ Donation: Ethical, Legal and Medical Challenges,” Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 38, no. 2 (2019): 111-113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross and Thistlethwaite, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Nair-Collins, M. et al., “Abandoning the Dead Donor Rule? A National Survey of Public Views on Death and Organ Donation,” Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (2015): 297-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar