Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:27:24.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lessons from the Sustainability Movement: Toward An Integrative Decision-Making Framework for Nanotechnology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Like biotechnology before it, nanotechnology is beginning to provoke opposition from environmentalists concerned about the ethics of the development and application of nanotechnologies. Given the lack of data on environmental health and safety regarding how nanoparticles might impact the environment and effect the health of the human body, some environmentalists have called for limits on the production of nanoproducts until more research can be done to prove their safety. On the other side, while nanotech scientists and engineers agree that additional study of possible harmful effects is in order, they argue it would be unethical to turn our backs on what nanotechnology may do to help clean up the environment and improve health. They argue that a ban on nanomaterials would be shortsighted.

Type
Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donaldson, K. Brown, D. Clouter, A. Duffin, R. MacNee, W. Renwick, L. et al., “The Pulmonary Toxicology of Ultrafine Particles,” Journal of Aerosol Medicine 15, no. 2 (2002): 213220; Oberdorster, G. Sharp, Z. Atudorei, V. Elder, A. Gelein, R. Kreyling, W. et al., “Translocation of Inhaled Ultrafine Particles to the Brain,” Inhalation Toxicology 16, nos. 6, 7 (2004) 437–445; European Commission, Nanotechnologies: A Preliminary Risk Analysis on the Basis of a Workshop Organized in Brussels on 1–2 March 2004 by the Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General of the European Commission (Brussels: European Commission, Community Health and Consumer Protection, 2004); Warheit, D. B. Laurence, B. R. Reed, K. L. Roach, D. H. Reynolds, G. A., and Webb, T. R., “Comparative Pulmonary Toxicity Assessment of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Rats,” Toxicological Sciences 77, no. 1 (2004): 117–125; Sayes, C. M. Fortner, J. D. Guo, W. Lyon, D. Byd, A. M. Ausman, K. D. Tao, Y. J. Sitharaman, B. Wilson, L. J. Hughes, J. B. West, J. L. Colvin, V. L., “The Differential Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Fullerenes,” Nano Letters 4 (2004): 1881–1887; Frampton, M. W. Stewart, J. C. Oberdorster, G. Morrow, P. E. Chalupa, D. et al., “Inhalation of Ultrafine Particles Alters Blood Leukocyte Expression of Adhesion Molecules in Humans,” Environmental Health Perspectives 114, no. 1 (2006): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soskoline, C. L. and Bertollini, R., Global Ecological Integrity and “Sustainable Development (Rome: WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, 2004): at 11.Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
United States National Research Council, Our Common Journey: A Transition towards Sustainability (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999); see also, Institute of Medicine, Who Will Keep the Public Health? Educating Public Health Professionals for the 21st Century (The National Academies Press: Washington, 2003).Google Scholar
Hancock, T., “The Mandala of Health: A Model of the Human Ecosystem,” Family and Community Health 8 (1985): 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. A. Nicholson, R. Stephenson, P. Bennett, K. J., and Smith, J., Grass Roots and Common Ground: Guidelines for Community-Based Environmental Health Action (Richmond, Australia: University of Western Sydney Press, 2001): at 52.Google Scholar
Brown, V., ed., Managing for Local Sustainability: Policy Problem-Solving, Practice and Place (Richmond, Australia: University of Western Sydney Press, 1997): at 23. Kolb, D. Rubin, I., and McIntyre, J., Organizational Psychology: An Experiential Approach (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1974).Google Scholar
See Kolb, supra note 7.Google Scholar
Senge, P. M., The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (London: Century Business, 1992).Google Scholar
Ireland, J., “Managing the Mind while Managing the Environment: Tools for Thinking Strategically,” in Brown, V., ed., Managing for Local Sustainability: Policy, Problem-Solving, Practice and Place (Richmond, Australia: University of Western Sydney Press, 1997).Google Scholar
See Ireland, supra note 10.Google Scholar
Skumanich, M. and Silbernagel, M., Foresighting Around the World: A Review of Seven Best-in-Kind Programs, at 2.3. Available at <http://www.seattle.battelle.org/Services/ES/foresite/index.htm> (last visited September 6, 2006).+(last+visited+September+6,+2006).>Google Scholar
Wheeler, K. A. and Bijur, Perraca A., eds., Education for a Sustainable Future: A Paradigm of Hope for the 21st Century (New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000): at 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodore, L. and Kunz, R. G., Nanotechnology: Environmental Implications and Solutions (New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2005): 16.Google Scholar
Zwang, W., “Nanoscale Iron Particles for Environmental Remediation: An Overview,” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5 (2003): 323332; see also “Tiny Particles Could Solve Billion-Dollar Problem,” Science Daily, March 8, 2005; see also Theodore, & Kunz, supra note 15, 12–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberdorster, E., “Manufactured Nanomaterials (fullerenes, C60) Induce Oxidative Stress in the Brain of Juvenile Largemouth Bass,” Environmental Health Perspectives 112, no. 10 (2004): 1058–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar