Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:58:10.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How the Guardianship System Can Help Address Gun Violence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2021

Nina A. Kohn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article shows how state guardianship law can provide a mechanism for courts to reduce gun violence by removing the right to possess firearms from individuals found, after hearing and due process, to be incapable of safely possessing them. It explores how this often overlooked body of law not only complements extreme risk protection orders where they exist, but can also be used to accomplish a portion of what such orders are designed to do in states that have not authorized them. It concludes by suggesting some modest adjustments to guardianship law and practice that would help ensure that guardianship systems interventions in this arena are fair and effective.

Type
Online Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 48 , Issue S4: Gun Violence in America: An Interdisciplinary Examination , Winter 2020 , pp. 133 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABC News/Washington Post Poll Sept. 2–5, 2019, Polling Report Website, available at <https://pollingreport.com/guns.htm> (last visited September 18, 2020).+(last+visited+September+18,+2020).>Google Scholar
Quinnipiac University Poll Aug. 21–26, 2019, Polling Report Website, available at <https://pollingreport.com/guns.htm> (last visited September 18, 2020).+(last+visited+September+18,+2020).>Google Scholar
See generally Sklar, T., “Elderly Gun Ownership and the Wave of State Red Flag Laws: An Unintended Consequence That Could Help Many,” Elder Law Journal 27 (2019): 35-49.Google Scholar
See Kohn, N.A., Blumenthal, J.A., and Campbell, A.T., “Supported Decision-Making: A Viable Alternative to Guardianship?” Penn State Law Review 117 (2013): 1111-1157, at 1117-1120.Google Scholar
See Kohn, N.A., “Fiduciary Principles in Surrogate Decision-Making,” in Sitkoff, R. et al., eds., Oxford Handbook of Fiduciary Law (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
See Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § 8103(e) (2020); D.C. Code § 7-2502.03(a)(6) (2020); Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-133(b) (2020); Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 140, § 129B(1)(iii), ch. 215, § 56C (2020); Mich. Comp. Laws Serv. § 28.422(3) (h) (2020); N.Y. Penal Law § 400.00(1) (2020); 11 R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-47-6 (2020).Google Scholar
See Wash. Rev. Code § 11.130 (2020).Google Scholar
See Me. Stat. tit. 18-C, art. 5 (2020).Google Scholar
See Unif. Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act, art. 5 (Unif. Law Comm'n 2017) [hereafter cited as UGCOPAA].Google Scholar
See, e.g., Minn. Stat. § 524.5-401 (2020); D.C. Code § 21-2056.Google Scholar
See UGCOPAA §§ 301, 401.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
ABA Commission on Law and Aging and S.B. Hurme, Capacity Definition & Initiation of Guardianship Proceedings (2019), available at <https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/chartcapacityandinitiation.pdf> (last visited September 18, 2020).+(last+visited+September+18,+2020).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Okla. Stat. tit. 30, § 1-111 (2020).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Conn. Gen. Stat. § 45a-650(f) (2020).Google Scholar
See National Institute of Mental Health, Suicide, available at <https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide.shtml> (last visited September 18, 2020).+(last+visited+September+18,+2020).>Google Scholar
See Kochanek, K.D. et al., Deaths: Final Data for 2017, National Vital Statistics Report 68 (June 14, 2019): at table 7, available at <https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf> (last visited September 18, 2020).+(last+visited+September+18,+2020).>Google Scholar
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4) (2020).Google Scholar
27 C.F.R. § 478.11 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Tex. Est. Code Ann. § 1202.201(a) (2019).Google Scholar
See e.g., Wis. Stat. § 54.10(3)(f)(1) (2020); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 159.0593 (2019).Google Scholar
See District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 626 (2008); Petramala v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, No. CV 10-2002, 2011 WL 3880826 (D. Ariz. Sept. 2, 2011), Jeffries v. Sessions, 278 F. Supp. 3d 831 (E.D. Pa. 2017).Google Scholar
Ok. St. t. 21 §1289.24b (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Sklar, supra note 3, at 45 tbl. 1.Google Scholar
See Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, Mental Health Reporting, available at <https://lawcenter.giffords.org/gun-laws/policy-areas/background-checks/mental-health-reporting/#state> (last visited September 18, 2020).+(last+visited+September+18,+2020).>Google Scholar