No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Going for the Burn: Medical Preparedness in Early Cold War America
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Extract
On September 23, 1949, President Harry Truman announced that the Soviet Union had successfully detonated an atomic bomb. The news that the Soviet Union had done this came as little surprise to a number of American scientists and to some members of the intelligence community who had predicted that the Soviets would quickly acquire this advanced weapons technology. But for many Americans this news was disturbing. Truman’s announcement was taken up by, among others, a young Baptist evangelist named Billy Graham. Opening a tent revival in Los Angeles just two days after the President’s report, Graham preached how the news of the Soviet bomb test had “startled the world” and launched an “arms race unprecedented in the history of the world.” President Truman, he informed his listeners, said that we “must be prepared for any eventuality at any hour….” Perhaps even more ominously he asked the crowd, “Do you know the area that is marked out for the enemy’s first atomic bomb? New York! Secondly, Chicago; and thirdly, the city of Los Angeles!” It was not only evangelical preachers who foresaw catastrophic implications from a growing arsenal of atomic weapons.
- Type
- Symposium
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2011
References
Boyer, P., “Physicians Confront the Apocalypse: The American Medical Profession and the Threat of Nuclear War,” JAMA 254, no. 5 (1985): 633–643. This essay was reprinted in Boyer, P., Fallout: A Historian Reflects on America's Half-Century Encounter with Nuclear Weapons (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1998): 61–86.Google Scholar
This is an immense literature; an excellent starting place is McEnaney, L., Civil Defense Begins at Home: Militarization Meets Everyday Life in the Fifties (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000). See also Garrison, D., Bracing for Armageddon: Why Civil Defense Never Worked (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006); Grossman, A. D., Neither Dead nor Red: Civil Defense and American Political Development During the Early Cold War (New York: Routledge, 2001); and Krugler, D. F., This Ls Only a Test: How Washington D.C Prepared for Nuclear War (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearse, H. E. and Payne, J. T., “Mechanical and Thermal Injury from the Atomic Bomb,” New England Journal of Medicine 241, no. 17 (1949): 647–53, at 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
For a discussion of dual purpose radiation experimentation, see The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.)Google Scholar
Lindee, M. S., Suffering Made Real: American Science and the Survivors at Hiroshima (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994): At 32.Google Scholar
“Effects of Atomic Bomb Explosions at Hiroshima and Nagasaki,” JAMA 131, no. 7 (1946): 598–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, P. D., “A Clinical Syndrome Following Exposure to Atomic Bomb Explosions,” JAMA 131, no. 6 (1946): 504–506, at 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Atomic Bombs Caused 320,000 Jap Casualties,” Los Angeles Times, July 4, 1946, at 1.Google Scholar
LeRoy, G. V., “The Medical Sequelae of the Atomic Bomb Explosion,” JAMA 134, no. 14 (1947): 1143–1148, at 1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, R. P., “Trauma Resulting from Atomic Explosions,” American Journal of Surgery 76, no. 5 (1948): 559–562 at 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, Roy, “U. of C. To Train Physicians for Atom Disaster,” Chicago Tribune, September 30, 1947, 3; “Chicago University will Teach Doctors How to Treat Victims of an Atomic War,” New York Times, October 1, 1947, 27.Google Scholar
Jacobson, L., Stone, R. S. and Garrott Allen, J., “Physicians in an Atomic War,” JAMA 139, no. 3 (1949): 138–140, at 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ld., at 140.Google Scholar
Pearse, H. E. and Payne, J. T., “Mechanical and Thermal Injury from the Atomic Bomb,” New England Journal of Medicine 241, no. 17 (1949): 647–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBakey, M. E. and Carter, B. N., “Current Considerations of War Surgery,” Annals of Surgery 121, no. 5 (1945): 545–63. See also Saffle, J. R., “The 1942 Fire at Boston's Cocoanut Grove Nightclub,” American Journal of Surgery 166, no. 6 (1993): 581–91, and Ravage, B., Burn Unit: Saving Lives after the Flames (Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press, 2004.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauley, G. B. and Ivy, A. C., “Prevention of Flash Burns by a Protective Glove Film,” US Naval Medical Bulletin 43, no. 2 (1944): 209–215. The researchers made tests on some 60 Naval personnel “volunteers.”Google Scholar
Parsons, , supra note 12, at 559.Google Scholar
See Liebow, A. A., Encounter with Disaster: A Medical Diary of Hiroshima, 1945 (New York: WW Norton, 1970): At 132 for an image of a Japanese man burned wearing a “light-weight singlet.” DeVore, R., “What the Atomic Bomb Really Did,” Collier's, March 2, 1946, 36.Google Scholar
Not all medical scientists accepted the racial association. In his The Biology of the Negro (1942), pathologist Julian Herman Lewis speculated that a keloid was simply more conspicuous on dark skins, and that the growth was not uncommon in white people. “Illustrations of keloids in textbooks are almost invariably taken from Negro subjects, and in the American literature, when certain features of the tumor are reported, the cases in illustration are likely to be in colored people.” Still Lewis associated greater pigmentation with keloids, citing the fact that “other dark but non-Negro races,” including Tahitians, Hindus, Australians, and Malayans, experienced higher rates of the growth. See Lewis, J. H., The Biology of the Negro (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942): 332–334.Google Scholar
See Lederer, S. E., “Darkened by the Shadow of the Atom: Burn Research in 1950s America,” in Eckart, W., ed., Man, Medicine, and the State: The Human Body as an Object of Government Sponsored Medical Research in the 20th Century (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2006): 263–78.Google Scholar
Harkins, H. N., Cope, O., Evans, E.I., and Phillips, R. A., “The Fluid And Nutritional Therapy Of Burns: Memorandum Prepared By A Committee Appointed By Dr. Alfred Blalock, Chairman Of The Subcommittee On Shock,” JAMA 128, no. 7 (1945): 475.Google Scholar
Evans, E. I., “The Burn Problem in Atomic Warfare,” JAMA 143, no. 13 (1950): 1143–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. I. et al., “Flash Burn Studies on Human Volunteers,” Surgery 37, no. 2 (1955): 280–297.Google Scholar
“Surgeons Told A-Blasts Burn Before you Feel It,” Richmond Times Dispatch, May 18, 1954.Google Scholar
Smith, S. L., “Mustard Gas and American Race-Based Experiments in World War II,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 3 (2004): 517–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, for example “Toxicity of Primaquine in Negroes,” JAMA 149, no. 17 (1952): 1568–70. The incidence of anemia among Negroes receiving this drug prompted a study on “Negro volunteers” at Illinois State Penitentiary, on 52 enlisted Negro personnel at Fort Knox, and on 317 “Nicaraguan natives who had a mixture of Indian and Negro Bloods.”CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Lederer, S. E., Flesh and Blood: Organ Transplantation and Blood Transfusion in Twentieth-Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.)Google Scholar
Evans, E. I. and Biggar, I. A., “The Rationale of Whole Blood Therapy in Severe Burns,” Annals of Surgery 122, no. 4 (1945): 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, E. I., Purnell, O. J., Robinett, P. W., Batchelor, A., and Martin, M., “Fluid and Electrolyte Requirements in Severe Burns,” Annals of Surgery 135, no. 6 (1952): 804–17. See Pruitt, B. A. and Wolf, S. E., “An Historical Perspective on Advances in Burn Care Over the Past 100 Years,” Clinical Plastic Surgery 36, no. 4 (2009): 527–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar