Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-7lvjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T01:59:07.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting the “Informed” into “Informed Consent,” and Proving It

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

David M. Studdert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Independent Articles: Commentary
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 46 , Issue 4: Next Steps in Health Reform , Winter 2018 , pp. 975 - 977
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McNeil, B., Weichselbaum, R., and Pauker, S., “Fallacy of the Five-Year Survival in Lung Cancer,” New England Journal of Medicine 299 (1978): 1397–1401.Google Scholar
Brodney, S., Westcott, P.H., Moulton, B.W., et al., “A Decision Aid May Offer Liability Protection for a Bad Obstetrical Outcome: Results of Mock Trials,” Journal Law, Medicine & Ethics 46, no. 4 (2018): 967–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottrell, M.M., Alpert, H., Fischbach, R.L., and Emanuel, L.L., “Hospital Informed Consent for Procedure Forms: Facilitating Quality Patient-Physician Interaction,” Archives of Surgery 135, no. 1 (2000): 26–33; Lavelle-Jones, C., Byrne, D.J., Rice, P., and Cuschieri, A., “Factors Affecting Quality of Informed Consent,” BMJ 306, no. 6882 (1993): 885-890; J.W. Berg, P.S. Appelbaum, C.W. Lidz, and L.S. Parker, Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice, 2nd edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Barry, M.J., Wescott, P.H., Reifler, E.J., Chang, Y., and Moulton, B.W., “Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit: Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. 2 (2008): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S.S., “Illuminations and Shadows from Jury Simulations,” Law and Human Behavior 21, no. 5 (1997): 561–571; Wiener, R.L., Krauss, D.A., Lieberman, J.D., “Mock Jury Research: Where Do We Go from Here?” Behavioral Sciences & the Law 29 (2011): 467–479; M.B. Kovera, The Psychology of Juries (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2017).Google Scholar
Diamond, S.S., Rose, M.R., and Murphy, B., “Revisiting the Unanimity Requirement: The Behavior of the Non-Unanimous Civil Jury,” Northwestern University Law Review 100, no. 1 (2006): 201–230.Google Scholar
Bornstein, B.H., Golding, J.M., Neuschatz, J., et al. “Mock Juror Sampling Issues in Jury Simulation Research: A Meta-Analysis,” Law and Human Behavior 41, no. 1 (2017): 13–28.Google Scholar
Studdert, D.M. et al. “Claims, Errors, and Compensation Payments in Medical Malpractice Litigation,” New England Journal of Medicine 354 (2006): 2024–2033; Gogos, A.J., Clark, R.B., Bismark, M.M., et al. “When Informed Consent Goes Poorly: A Descriptive Study of Medical Negligence Claims and Patients Complaints,” The Medical Journal of Australia 195, no. 6 (2011): 340-344.Google Scholar
Id.; Bismark, M.M., Gogos, A.J., Clark, R.B., et al, “Legal Disputes Over Duties to Disclose Treatment Risks to Patients: A Review of Negligence Claims and Complaints in Australia,” PLOS Medicine 9, no. 8 (2012), available at <https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001283> (last visited November 13, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar