Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T12:54:15.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom of Conscience, Professional Responsibility, and Access to Abortion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Rebecca S. Dresser
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Access to abortion is becoming increasingly restricted for many women in the United States. Besides the longstanding financial barriers facing low-income women in most states, a newer source of scarcity has emerged. The relatively small number of physicians willing to perform the procedure is compromising the ability of women in certain parts of the country to obtain an abortion.

Do physicians have a duty to respond to this situation? Do they have a professional responsibility to ensure that abortions are reasonably available to the women who want to terminate their pregnancies? Or, is abortion so morally and socially controversial as to remove any professional obligation to provide reasonable access?

Both law and medical ethics have traditionally protected physicians’ freedom to refuse to perform any procedure, including abortion, that conflicts with their religious or other moral beliefs.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Fall 1994 , pp. 280 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daar, Judith F., “A Clash at the Bedside: Patient Autonomy v. a Physician's Professional Conscience,” Hastings Law Journal, 44 (1993): 1241–89.Google Scholar
Loftus, Irene P., “I Have a Conscience, Too: The Plight of Medical Personnel Confronting the Right to Die,” Notre Dame Law Review, 65 (1990): 699–730.Google Scholar
112 S. Ct. 2791 (1992).Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 114 S. Ct. 909 (1994) (refusing to issue a stay on enforcing waiting period in Pennsylvania law).Google Scholar
Henshaw, Stanley K. Van Vort, Jennifer, “Abortion Services in the United States, 1991 and 1992,” Family Planning Perspectives, 26, no. 3 (1994): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, James D. Brann, Edward A. Schulz, Kenneth F., “Abortion Utilization: Does Travel Distance Matter?,” Family Planning Perspectives, 8, no. 6 (1976): 260–62. See also Fung, Archon, “Making Rights Real: Roe's Impact on Abortion Access,” Politics & Society, 21, no. 4 (1993): 465-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“ACOG Poll: Ob-Gyns’ Support for Abortion Unchanged Since 1971,” Family Planning Perspectives, 17, no. 6 (1985): 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, Margaret T. Forrest, Jacqueline D., “The Availability of Reproductive Health Services from U.S. Private Physicians,” Family Planning Perspectives, 17, no. 2 (1985): 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darney, Philip D. Landy, Uta MacPherson, Sara et al., “Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs,” Family Planning Perspectives, 19, no. 4 (1987): 158–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Helene, “Medical Schools, Students Shun Abortion Study,” The Wall Street Journal, Mar. 12, 1993, sec. B1.Google Scholar
Westoff, Carolyn Marks, Frances Rosenfeld, Allan, “Residency Training in Contraception, Sterilization, and Abortion,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 81, no. 2 (1993): 311–14.Google Scholar
Seelye, Katherine Q., “Enter RU-486, Exit Hype,” The New York Times, May 22, 1994, sec. 4, 16.Google Scholar
Id. See also Silvestre, Louise Dubois, Catherine Renault, Maguy et al., “Voluntary Interruption of Pregnancy With Mifepristone (RU 486) and a Prostaglandin Analogue,” New England Journal of Medicine, 322, no. 10 (1990): 645–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, Nina, “Surprising Journey for Abortion Drug,” The New York Times, Mar. 23, 1994, sec. B6.Google Scholar
Blendon, Robert J. Benson, John M. Donelan, Karen, “The Public and the Controversy over Abortion,” JAMA, 270 (1993): 2871–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 112 S. Ct. at 2807; and Ginsberg, Ruth B., “Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade,” North Carolina Law Review, 63 (1985): 375–86.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Vort, Van, supra note 5, at 101.Google Scholar
Benshoof, Janet, “Planned Parenthood v. Casey: The Impact of the New Undue Burden Standard on Reproductive Health Care,” JAMA, 269 (1993): 2249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimer, Sara, “Forceps and Fear on Abortion Circuit,” The New York Times, Sept. 3, 1993, sec. A1.Google Scholar
Mirvis, David M., “Physicians' Autonomy—The Relation Between Public and Professional Expectations,” New England Journal of Medicine, 328, no. 18 (1993): 1346–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman, “Duty to Treat or Right to Refuse?,” Hastings Center Report, 21, no. 2 (1991): 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darr, , supra note 1. See also Blustein, Jeffrey, “Doing What the Patient Orders: Maintaining Integrity in the Doctor-Patient Relationship,” Bioethics, 7, no. 4 (1993): 289–314.Google Scholar
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, “Mandatory Parental Consent to Abortion,” JAMA, 269 (1993): 82–86; American Medical Association, “Public Funding of Abortion Services,” Policy Compendium (1992): Sec. 5.998; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “Confidentiality in Adolescent Health Care,” ACOG Statement of Policy (1988); American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, “ACOG Policy on Abortion,” ACOG Statement of Policy (1993); and American Medical Women's Association, “Abortion,” AMWA Resolutions Booklet, (1960–1992): Secs. 1989.3, 1991.1, 1991.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cans, Janet E. Rinaldi, Robert C. Loeb, Jerod, “Abortion Mortality Trends,” JAMA, 269, no. 17 (1993): 2211–12.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Dezell, Maureen, “Stalked by Fear,” Boston Phoenix, Apr. 23, 1993, sec. 1, 22.Google Scholar
Howe, Edmund G., “On Expanding the Parameters of Assisted Suicide, Directive Counseling, and Overriding Patients’ Cultural Beliefs,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 4, no. 2 (1993): 107–11.Google Scholar
Chervenak, Frank A. McCullough, Laurence B., “Does Obstetric Ethics Have Any Role in the Obstetrician's Response to the Abortion Controversy?,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 163, no. 5 (1990): 1425–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darney, Landy, MacPherson, et al., supra note 9.Google Scholar
Grimes, David A., “Clinicians Who Provide Abortions: The Thinning Ranks,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, 80, no. 4 (1992): 719–23.Google Scholar
Chervenak, McCullough, , supra note 28.Google Scholar
Henshaw, Vort, Van, supra note 5.Google Scholar
Darney, Landy, MacPherson, et al., supra note 9.Google Scholar
Orr, Forrest, , supra note 8.Google Scholar
Miles, Steven H. Singer, Peter A. Siegler, Mark, “Conflicts Between Patients' Wishes to Forgo Treatment and the Policies of Health Care Facilities,” New England Journal of Medicine, 321, no. 1 (1989): 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
Darney, Landy, MacPherson, et al., supra note 9.Google Scholar
Benshoof, , supra note 18; Smothers, Ronald, “Abortion Doctor and Bodyguard Slain in Florida,” The New York Times, July 30, 1994, sec. A1; and Lewin, Tamar, “Clinic Firebombed in Pennsylvania,” The New York Times, Sept. 30, 1993, sec. A16.Google Scholar
Rohter, Larry, “Doctor is Slain During Protest over Abortions,” The New York Times, Mar. 11, 1993, sec. A1.Google Scholar
Grimes, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
Id.; and Freedman, Mary A. Jillson, David A. Coffin, Roberta R. et al., “Comparison of Complication Rates in First Trimester Abortions Performed by Physician Assistants and Physicians,” American Journal of Public Health, 76, no. 5 (1986): 550–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, , supra note 30.Google Scholar
“The Unfinished Abortion Battle (editorial),” The New York Times, May 12, 1993, sec. A18.Google Scholar
Pub. L. No. 103–259, 108 Stat. 694 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Reproductive Law & Policy, “A Woman's Right to Choose After Planned Parenthood v. Casey,” July 20, 1994.Google Scholar
Hinds, Michael D., “Anti-Abortion Drive Surprisingly Quiet,” The New York Times, July 15, 1993, sec. A16.Google Scholar