Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:35:27.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethically Important Distinctions among Managed Care Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Kate T. Christensen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Due to society's need to control health care costs and to the failure of legislated health care reform, managed care is expanding at a rapid rate and will soon be the predominate form of health care delivery. Plans by Congress to bring Medicare and Medicaid under managed care will further consolidate this trend. Barring some legislative fiat, managed care is here to stay.

The term managed care describes a diverse set of organizational forms. Wide variations in approach, financing, physician involvement, and philosophy exist among the different types of managed care organizations (MCOs). While many articles on the ethics of managed care acknowledge this variety, most analyses focus on the for-profit entities, paying less attention to the ethical distinctions among the different forms of managed care. This paper discusses the key distinctions among MCO types, in particular the difference between for-profit and non-profit plans; the relationship of the physician to the MCO; the incentives used to control costs; the incentives that improve patient care; and the organizational features that nurture the principled practice of medicine.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , Fall 1995 , pp. 223 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rodwin, Marc A., Medicine, Money & Morals: Physicians' Conflicts of Interest (New York: Oxford, 1993): At 17; Fletcher, John Engelhard, Carolyn, “Ethical Issues in Managed Care,” Virginia Medicine Quarterly, 122, no. 3 (1995): 162–67; Quint, Michael, “Health Plans Force Changes in the Way Doctors Are Paid,” New York Times, Feb. 9, 1995, at A1; Relman, Arnold S., “Medical Practice Under the Clinton Reforms—Avoiding Domination by Business,” N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 1574–76; and Mitka, Mike, “HMOs See Steady Growth, Some Market Shifts,” American Medical News, May 1, 1995, at 9.Google Scholar
Freudenheim, Milt, “Medicare, Jot This Down: Employers Offer Valuable Lessons on Saving Money with Managed Care,” New York Times, May 31, 1995, at C1; Johnsson, Julie, “Medicare's Bumpy Ride into Private Sector,” American Medical News, June 12, 1995, at 1; Clymer, Adam, “An Accidental Overhaul: Major Revamping of Health Care System Could be Byproduct of Steep Budget Cuts,” New York Times, June 26, 1995, at A1; and Freudenheim, Milt, “Corporations Step up Efforts to Get Retirees into H.M.O.'s,” New York Times, June 13, 1995, at C1.Google Scholar
Relman, Arnold S., “The Impact of Marker Forces on the Physician-Patient Relationship,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87 (supp. 22) (1994): 22–25; Relman, Arnold S., “Medical Insurance and Health: What about Managed Care?,” N. Engl. J. Med., 331 (1994): 471–72; and Pellegrino, Edmund, “Ethics,” JAMA, 271 (1994): 1668–70.Google Scholar
Johnsson, Julie, “Megamerger of Two Public Plans Spurs New Interest in Stock Offering,” American Medical News, Apr. 24, 1995, at 1; and Freudenheim, Milt, “Penny-Pinching H.M.O.'s Showed Their Generosity in Executive Paychecks,” New York Times, Apr. 11, 1995, at C1.Google Scholar
Cal. Code Non-Profit Corp., § 5130-B (West 1980).Google Scholar
See Freudenheim, , supra note 4; and Rodwin, Marc, “Conflicts in Managed Care,” N. Engl. J. Med., 332 (1995): 604–07.Google Scholar
Thompson, Steve Valentine, Zabrae, “The Profiteering of HMOs,” California Physician, July 1994, at 28–32, based on a California Department of Corporations report for 1992.Google Scholar
Alameda–Contra Costa Medical Association, “Latest CMA Study Shows Rise in HMO Costs and Profits,” ACCMA Bulletin, Feb. 1995, at 14; and Freudenheim, Milt, “A Bitter Pill for the HMO's,” New York Times, Apr. 28, 1995, at C1.Google Scholar
See Freudenheim, , supra note 6; and Hiltzik, Michael Olmos, David, “Are Executives at HMOs Paid too Much Money?,” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 30, 1995, at A13.Google Scholar
See Fletcher, Engelhard, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, John M., “Economics,” JAMA, 273 (1995): 1670–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, Alan, “Financial Incentives for Physicians in HMOs: Is There a Conflict of Interest?,” N. Engl. J. Med., 317 (1987): 1743–48; see Rodwin, , supra note 1, at 152–56.10.1056/NEJM198712313172725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prager, Linda, “State Licensing Boards Consider Curbing Financial Incentives,” American Medical News, Oct. 16, 1995, at 1, 74.Google Scholar
Emanuel, Ezekiel Dubler, Nancy N., “Preserving the Physician-Patient Relationship in the Era of Managed Care,” JAMA, 273 (1995): 323–29; see Rodwin, , supra note 1, at 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Lisa, “Family Doctors are Disappearing,” San Francisco Examiner, June 18, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar
Olmos, David, “Some Doctors Head to Idaho, a State Without Managed Care,” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 29, 1995, at All.Google Scholar
Herschberg, Seymour, “Potential Conflicts of Interest in the Delivery of Medical Services: An Analysis of the Situation and a Proposal,” Quality Assurance and Utilization Review, 7 (1992): 54–58.10.1177/0885713x9200700204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenkin, Budd, “The Independent Practice Association in Theory and Practice,” JAMA, 273 (1995): 1937–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Emily, “Changing the System: Implications for Physicians,” JAMA, 269 (1993): 2437–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, “Ethical Issues in Managed Care,” JAMA, 273 (1995): 330–35.Google Scholar
See Rodwin, , supra note 1, at 138–44.Google Scholar
See Relman, , supra note 1; and Cangello, Vincent, “The Real Issue,” ACCMA Bulletin, Jan. 1995, at 18.Google Scholar
Hiltzik, Michael, “Emergency Rooms, HMOs Clash over Treatments and Payments,” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 30, at A12.Google Scholar
Phillips, William, letter: “Hassle Hypertension: A Risk of Managed Care,” JAMA, 274 (1995): 795–96.10.1001/jama.1995.03530100035021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Rodwin, , supra note 1, at 135.Google Scholar
One study of IPAs and physician groups with capitated contracts shows that physicians tend to employ the same type of barriers to care, such as pre-authorization requirements, as health plans. The study did not include the largest group practice HMO in California, Kaiser Permanente, which does not use pre-authorization requirements to control costs. Kerr, Eve et al., “Managed Care and Capitation in California: How Do Physicians at Financial Risk Control Their Own Utilization?,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 123 (1995): 500–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosson, Francis J., “Why Outcomes Measurement Must be the Basis for the Development of Clinical Guidelines,” Managed Care Quarterly, 3, no. 2 (1995): 6–11; Eddy, David, “Broadening the Responsibilities of Practitioners: The Team Approach,” JAMA, 268 (1993): 1849–55; and Zendle, Les, “Controlling Costs: The Case of Kaiser,” JAMA, 274 (1995): 1135.Google Scholar
See Friedman, , supra note 19.Google Scholar
See Crosson, , supra note 27.Google Scholar
Hillman, Alan, “Health Maintenance Organizations, Financial Incentives, and Physicians' Judgments,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 112 (1990): 891–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodwin, , supra note 1, at 139–41.Google Scholar
Jecker, Nancy S., “Managed Competition and Managed Care,” Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 10 (1994): 527–40; see Emanuel, Dubler, , supra note 14; and Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, supra note 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clement, Dolores et al., “Access and Outcomes for Elderly Patients Enrolled in Managed Care,” JAMA, 271 (1994): 1487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, supra note 20; Sulmasy, Daniel, “Managed Care and Managed Death,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 155 (1995): 133–36; and Hiltzik, Michael Olmos, David, “A Mixed Diagnosis for HMO's,” Los Angeles Times, Aug. 27, 1995, at A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richmond, Julius, “The Health Care Mess,” JAMA, 273 (1995): 69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Steven, “End-of-Life Treatment in Managed Care: The Potential and the Peril,” Western Journal of Medicine, 163 (1995): 302–05.Google Scholar
See Eisenberg, , supra note 11; and “Study: Managed Care Lowers Hospital Costs, Improves Quality,” American Medical News, June 19, 1995, at 6.Google Scholar
Meisel, Joan, Quality of Care in HMOs: A Review of the Literature (Sacramento: CAHMO, Sept. 1994); California Cooperative HEDIS Reporting Initiative, Report on Quality of Care Measures (San Francisco: CCHRI, Feb. 1995); and National Committee for Quality Assurance, Report Card Pilot Project/Technical Report (New York: NCQA, 1994).Google Scholar
Somerville, Janice, “CMA Study: High HMO Administrative Costs for Medicaid,” American Medical News, May 15, 1995, at 12.Google Scholar
See Hillman, , supra note 12.Google Scholar
Woodstock Theological Center, Ethical Considerations in the Business Aspects of Health Care (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1995): At 9–14.Google Scholar
Id. at 20–22.Google Scholar
Board of Directors of Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, “Principles of Responsibility” (1984): In-house circular.Google Scholar
Forces external to managed care are exerting a growing pressure against undertreatment. For example, the 1990 Medicare amendment restricts prepaid plans contracting with the Health Care Financing Administration from creating an “incentive plan as an inducement to reduce or limit medically necessary services to a specific individual.” See Medicare law in 42 U.S.C. § 1395mm(i)(8)(A) (1990). Legislation pending in several states would put limits on the type of cost-control measures that MCOs can employ. See Ogrod, Eugene, “The Many Faces of Managed Care,” California Physician, Aug. 1995, at 10; and Johnsson, Julie, “State Laws on Managed Care Spur New Battles,” American Medical News, July 24, 1995, at 3, 51.Google Scholar
Biblo, Joan D. et al., Ethical Issues in Managed Care: Guidelines for Clinicians and Recommendations to Accrediting Organizations (Kansas City: Midwest Bioethics Center, 1995); Wolf, Susan M., “Health Care Reform and the Future of Physician Ethics,” Hastings Center Report, 24, no. 2 (1994): 28–41; see Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, supra note 20; and Tristram Engelhardt, H. Rie, Michael A., “Morality for Medical-Industrial Complex: A Code of Ethics for the Mass Marketing of Health Care,” N. Engl. J. Med., 319 (1988): 1086–89.Google Scholar
Barr, Donald, “The Effects of Organizational Structure on Primary Care Outcomes under Managed Care,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 122 (1995): 353–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Relman, , supra note 1; Angell, Marcia, “The Beginning of Health Care Reform: The Clinton Plan,” N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 1569–70; and Bernadin, Cardinal Joseph, “Making the Case for Not-for-Profit Healthcare,” speech by Bernadin, Cardinal Joseph, Harvard Business School Club of Chicago, Jan. 12, 1995.Google Scholar
See Rodwin, , supra note 1, at 136.Google Scholar
See Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, supra note 20.Google Scholar
Emanuel, Ezekiel, “Managed Competition and the Patient-Physician Relationship,” N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (1993): 879–82.Google Scholar
Harding, Jonathan, “The Role of Organizational Ethics Committees,” Physician Executive, 20, no. 2 (1994): 19–24; see Emanuel, and Dubler, , supra note 14.Google Scholar
Azevedo, David, “Can the World's Largest Integrated Health System Learn to Feel Small?,” Medical Economics, 72, no. 2 (1995): 82–103.Google Scholar
Azevedo, David, “What You Can Bargain for When HMO's Compete,” Business & Health, June (1995): 44–56.Google Scholar
Quint, Michael, “Merger to Create Largest Company for Health Plans,” New York Times, June 27, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar