Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:57:09.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Circumcision Is Unethical and Unlawful

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

J. Steven Svoboda ,
Peter W. Adler  and
Robert S. Van Howe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The foreskin is a complex structure that protects and moisturizes the head of the penis, and, being the most densely innervated and sensitive portion of the penis, is essential to providing the complete sexual response. Circumcision—the removal of this structure—is non-therapeutic, painful, irreversible surgery that also risks serious physical injury, psychological sequelae, and death. Men rarely volunteer for it, and increasingly circumcised men are expressing their resentment about it.

Circumcision is usually performed for religious, cultural and personal reasons. Early claims about its medical benefits have been proven false. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control have made many scientifically untenable claims promoting circumcision that run counter to the consensus of Western medical organizations.

Circumcision violates the cardinal principles of medical ethics, to respect autonomy (self-determination), to do good, to do no harm, and to be just. Without a clear medical indication, circumcision must be deferred until the child can provide his own fully informed consent.

In 2012, a German court held that circumcision constitutes criminal assault. Under existing United States law and international human rights declarations as well, circumcision already violates boys› absolute rights to equal protection, bodily integrity, autonomy, and freedom to choose their own religion. A physician has a legal duty to protect children from unnecessary interventions. Physicians who obtain parental permission through spurious claims or omissions, or rely on the American Academy of Pediatrics' position, also risk liability for misleading parents about circumcision.

Type
Symposium Articles
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 44 , Issue 2: Ethical and Legal Issues in Pediatrics , Summer 2016 , pp. 263 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kellogg, J. H., Plain Facts for Old and Young (Battle Creek, Michigan: Health Publishing Company, 1882): at 383-384.Google Scholar
Landy, H., Unpublished Interview by Ryan McAllister held on February 2, 2011 per personal communication by McAllister to Svoboda on October 29, 2013.Google Scholar
Morris, B. J., Tobian, A. A. R., and Hankins, C. A. et al., “Veracity and Rhetoric in Paediatric Medicine: A Critique of Svoboda and Van Howe's Response to the AAP Policy on Infant Male Circumcision,” Journal of Medical Ethics 40, no. 7 (2013); electronic publication number medethics-2013-101614. Svoboda and Van Howe responded to this article in J. S. Svoboda and R. S. Van Howe, “Circumcision: A Bioethical Challenge,” Journal of Medical Ethics (2014), available at <http://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2013/08/16/medethics-2013-101614/reply#medethics_el_16775> (last visited April 18, 2016).Google Scholar
Lehman, B. A., “The Age-Old Question of Circumcision,” Boston Globe, June 22, 1987, at 43.Google Scholar
Brown, J. L., “Medical-Legal Risks Associated with Circumcision of Newborn Males: Need for Revised Consent,” AAP News 34, no. 4 (2013): 1, 7, at 1.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision, “Male Circumcision,” Pediatrics 130, no. 3 (2012): 585-586, available at <www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/130/3/e756> (hereinafter cited as “2012 AAP Technical Report”).+(hereinafter+cited+as+“2012+AAP+Technical+Report”).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Doctors Opposing Circumcision, “Commentary on American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Circumcision Policy Statement,” available at <http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/pdf/2013-04-24_Commentary.pdf> (last visited April 18, 2016) (hereinafter cited as “Doctors Opposing Circumcision”).+(last+visited+April+18,+2016)+(hereinafter+cited+as+“Doctors+Opposing+Circumcision”).>Google Scholar
Adler, P.W., “The Draft CDC Circumcision Recommendations: Medical, Ethical, Legal, and Procedural Concerns,” International Journal of Children's Rights (publication pending).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Van Howe, R. S., “A CDC-Requested, Evidence-Based Critique of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014 Draft on Male Circumcision: How Ideology and Selective Science Lead to Superficial, Culturally-biased Recommendations by the CDC,” available at <https://www.academia.edu/10553782/A_CDC-requested_Evidence-based_Critique_of_the_Centers_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention_2014_Draft_on_Male_Circumcision_How_Ideology_and_Selective_Science_Lead_to_Superficial_Culturally-biased_Recommendations_by_the_CDC> (last visited May 9, 2016).+(last+visited+May+9,+2016).>Google Scholar
Intact America and Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, Response by Intact America and Attorneys for the Rights of the Child to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), “Recommendations for Providers Counseling Male Patients and Parents Regarding Male Circumcision and the Prevention of HIV Infection STIs, and other Health Outcomes,” available at <https://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=CDC-2014-0012-2897 and at http://arclaw.org/our-work/letters/response-intact-america-and-attorneys-rights-child-centers-disease-control-and-prev> (last visited May 8, 2016).+(last+visited+May+8,+2016).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Sorokan, S. T., Finlay, J. C., and Jefferies, A. L., “Canadian Paediatric Society Position Statement: Newborn Circumcision,” Paediatrics & Child Health 20, no. 6 (2015): 311-315, available at <www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/circumcision> (last visited May 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Cold, C. J. and Taylor, J. R., “The Prepuce,” BJU International 83, no. S1 (1999): 34-44 (hereinafter cited as “Cold and Taylor”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenister, T. W., “A Consideration of the Process Involved in the Development of the Prepuce in Man,” British Journal of Urology 28 (1956): 243-249.Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e760.Google Scholar
Watson, L., Unspeakable Mutilations: Circumcised Men Speak Out (North Charleston, South Carolina: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014)(“Watson”); Darby, R. and Cox, L., “Objections of a Sentimental Character: The Subjective Dimensions of Foreskin Loss,” in Zabus, C., ed., Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies around Excision and Circumcision (New York: Rodopi, 2009): at 145-168 (“Darby and Cox”); Hammond, T., “A Preliminary Poll of Men Circumcised in Infancy or Childhood,” BJU International 83, no. S1 (1999): 85-92 (“Hammond”).Google Scholar
Dunsmuir, W. D. and Gordon, E. M., “The History of Circumcision,” BJU International 83, no. S1 (1999): 1-12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, F. M., “The History of Phimosis from Antiquity to the Present,” in Denniston, G. C., Hodges, F. M., and Milos, M. F., eds., Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (New York: Kluwer Academic, 1999): 37-49, at 37 (“Hodges”).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Waldeck, S. E., “Using Male Circumcision to Understand Social Norms as Multipliers,” University of Cincinnati Law Review 72, no. 3 (2003): 455-567.Google Scholar
Brady, M., “Newborn Male Circumcision with Parental Consent, as Stated in the 2012 AAP Circumcision Policy Statement, Is Both Ethical and Legal in the United States,” presentation at Twentieth Pitts Lectureship in Medical Ethics, Charleston, South Carolina, October 18, 2013 (hereinafter cited as “Brady Pitts”).Google Scholar
Yang, C. C. and Bradley, W. E., “Reflex Innervation of the Bulbocavernosus Muscle,” BJU International 85, no. 7 (2000): 857-863; see Cold and Taylor, supra note 15; Money, J. and Davison, J., “Adult Penile Circumcision: Erotosexual and Cosmetic Sequelae,” Journal of Sex Research 19, no. 3 (1983): 289- 292; Lakshmanan, S. and Prakash, S., “Human Prepuce: Some Aspects of Structure and Function,” Indian Journal of Surgery 44 (1980): 134-137 (“Lakshmanan”); Jefferson, G., “The Peripenic Muscle: Some Observations on Anatomy of Phimosis,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics 23, no. 2 (1916): 177-181 (“Jefferson”).Google Scholar
See Cold and Taylor, supra note 15.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Kigozi, G., Wawer, M., and Ssettuba, A. et al., “Foreskin Surface Area and HIV Acquisition in Rakai, Uganda (Size Matters),” AIDS 23, no. 16 (2009): 2209-2213; Werker, P. M. N., Terng, A. S. C., and Kon, M., “The Prepuce Free Flap: Dissection of Feasibility Study and Clinical Application of a Super-Thin New Flap,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 102 (1998): 1075-1082.Google Scholar
See Jefferson, supra note 24.Google Scholar
Fleiss, P. M., Hodges, F. M., and Van Howe, R. S., “Immunological Functions of the Human Prepuce,” Sexually Transmitted Infections 74, no. 5 (1998): 364-367; Simpson, E. T. and Barraclough, P., “The Management of the Paediatric Foreskin,” The Australian Family Physician 27, no. 5 (1998): 381-383.Google Scholar
See Cold and Taylor, supra note 15; Landers, M. M., “The Human Prepuce,” in Denniston, G. C., and Milos, M. F., eds., Sexual Mutilations a Human Tragedy (New York: Plenum Press, 1997): at 77-83; Taves, D., “The Intromission Function of the Foreskin,” Medical Hypotheses 59, no. 2 (2002): 180-182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. R., Lockwood, A. P., and Taylor, A. J., “The Prepuce: Specialized Mucosa of the Penis and Its Loss to Circumcision,” British Journal of Urology 77, no. 2 (1996): 291-295.Google Scholar
Hill, W. L., Borovsky, D., and R.-Collier, C., “Continuities in Infant Memory Development,” Development Psychiatry Biology 21, no. 1 (1988): 43-62; Weiss, G. N. and Weiss, E. B., “A Perspective on Controversies over Neonatal Circumcision,” Clinical Pediatrics (Philadelphia) 33, no. 12 (1994): 726-730.Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e770.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, “Prevention and Management of Procedural Pain in the Neonate: An Update,” Pediatrics 137, no. 2 (2016): e20154271, at 1, 2, available at <http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2016/01/22/peds.2015-4271.full.pdf> (last visited May 8, 2016) (hereinafter cited as “AAP Pain”).+(last+visited+May+8,+2016)+(hereinafter+cited+as+“AAP+Pain”).>Google Scholar
Id., at 1.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. L., “Circumcision Anesthesia: A Study of Nursing Implications for Dorsal Penile Nerve Block,” Pediatric Nursing 23, no. 1 (1997): 59-63.Google Scholar
American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs, Report 10: Neonatal Circumcision (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1999) (hereinafter cited as “AMA Report”), at notes 33-34.Google Scholar
Porter, F. L., Wolf, C. M., Gold, J., Lotsoff, D., and Miller, J. P., “Pain and Pain Management in Newborn Infants: A Survey of Physicians and Nurses,” Pediatrics 100, no. 4 (1997): 626-632.Google Scholar
Stang, H. J., Gunnar, M. R., and Snellman, L. et al., “Local Anesthesia for Neonatal Circumcision: Effects on Distress and Cortisol Response,” JAMA 259, no. 10 (1988): 1507-1511; Van Howe, R. S., “Anaesthesia for Circumcision: A Review of the Literature,” in Denniston, G. C., Hodges, F. M., and Milos, M. F., eds., Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (New York: Kluwer Academic, 1999): at 67-97.Google Scholar
Rappaport, B., Mellon, R., Simone, A., and Woodcock, J., “Defining Safe Use of Anesthesia in Children,” New England Journal of Medicine 364, no. 15 (2011): 1387-1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady-Fryer, B., Wiebe, N., and Lander, J.A., “Pain Relief for Neonatal Circumcision,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 4 (2007): Article Number CD004217.Google Scholar
Lander, J., Brady-Fryer, B., and Metcalfe, J. B. et al., “Comparison of Ring Block, Dorsal Penile Nerve Block, and Topical Anesthesia for Neonatal Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” JAMA 278, no. 24 (1997): 2157-2162, at 2161.Google Scholar
Anders, T. F. and Chalemian, R. J., “The Effects of Circumcision on Sleep-Wake States in Human Neonates,” Psychosomatic Medicine 36, no. 2 (1974): 174-179; Emde, R. N., Harmon, R. J., and Metcalf, D. et al., “Stress and Neonatal Sleep,” Psychosomatic Medicine 33, no. 6 (1971): 491-497.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health, “The Assessment and Management of Acute Pain in Infants, Children, and Adolescents,” Pediatrics 108, no. 3 (2001): 793-797 at 794; Howard, C. R., Howard, F. M., and Weitzman, M. L., “Acetaminophen Analgesia in Neonatal Circumcision: The Effect on Pain,” Pediatrics 93, no. 4 (1994): 641-646 (hereinafter cited as “Howard”).Google Scholar
Marshall, R. E., Porter, F. L., and Rogers, A. et al., “Circumcision II: Effects upon Mother-Infant Interaction,” Early Human Development 7, no. 4 (1982): 367-374; see Howard, et al., supra note 45; Dixon, S., Snyder, J., and Holve, R. et al., “Behavioral Effects of Circumcision With and Without Anesthesia,” Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 5, no. 5 (1984): 246-250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taddio, A., Goldbach, M., Ipp, M., Stevens, B., and Koren, G., “Effect of Neonatal Circumcision on Pain Responses during Vaccination in Boys,” Lancet 345, no. 8945 (1995): 291-292; Taddio, A., Katz, J., Ilersich, A. L., and Koren, G., “Effect of Neonatal Circumcision on Pain Response during Subsequent Routine Vaccination,” Lancet 349, no. 9052 (1997): 599-603.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Jacobson, B., Eklund, G., and Hamberger, L. et al., “Perinatal Origin of Adult Self-Destructive Behavior,” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 76, no. 4 (1987): 364-371; Ramsay, D. S. and Lewis, M., “The Effects of Birth Condition on Infants' Cortisol Response to Stress,” Pediatrics 95, no. 4 (1995): 546-549; Anders, T. F., Sachar, E. J., Kream, J., Roffwarg, H. P., and Hellman, L., “Behavioral State and Plasma Cortisol Response in the Human Newborn,” Pediatrics 46, no. 4 (1970): 532-537; McBurnett, K., Lahey, B. B., Rathouz, P. J., and Loeber, R., “Low Salivary Cortisol and Persistent Aggression in Boys Referred for Disruptive Behavior,” Archives of General Psychiatry 57, no. 1 (2000): 38-43; Grunau, R. E., Weinberg, J., and Whitfield, M. F., “Neonatal Procedural Pain and Preterm Infant Cortisol Response to Novelty at 8 Months,” Pediatrics 114, no. 1 (2004): e77-e84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, A. Z. and Kriebel, D., “Prenatal and Perinatal Analgesic Exposure and Autism: An Ecological Link,” Environmental Health 12, no. 1 (2013): 41; Frisch, M. and Simonsen, J., “Ritual Circumcision and Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder in 0- to 9-Year-Old Boys: National Cohort Study in Denmark,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 108, no. 7 (2015): 266-279.Google Scholar
KNMG, Non-therapeutic Circumcision of Male Minors (Utrecht, Netherlands: KNMP, 2010) (hereinafter cited as “KNMG Report”).Google Scholar
Krill, A. J., Palmer, L. S., and Palmer, J. S., “Complications of Circumcision,” Scientific World Journal 11, no. 11 (2011): 2458-2468, at 2462 (hereinafter cigted as “Krill”).Google Scholar
Mahmouchi, M. and Alkhotani, A., “Is Neonatal Circumcision Judicious?” European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 17, no. 4 (2007): 266-269.Google Scholar
Ungar-Sargon, E., “On the Impermissibility of Infant Male Circumcision: A Response to Mazor (2013),” Journal of Medical Ethics 41, no. 2 (2015): 186-190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, List of Legal Victories Proving Harm Caused by Circumcision, available at <http://arclaw.org/resources/settlements> (last visited April 18, 2016) (ARC Lawsuit List).+(last+visited+April+18,+2016)+(ARC+Lawsuit+List).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Thorup, J., Thorup, S. C., and Ifaoui, I. B. R., “Complication Rate after Circumcision in a Paediatric Surgical Setting Should Not Be Neglected,” Danish Medical Journal 60, no. 8 (2013): A4681.Google Scholar
Joudi, M., Fathi, M., and Hiradfar, M., “Incidence of Asymptomatic Meatal Stenosis in Children Following Neonatal Circumcision,” Journal of Pediatric Urology 7, no. 5 (2011): 526-528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Krill, supra note 51.Google Scholar
Id., at 2462.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M. D., “The Debate over Circumcision: Should All Males Be Circumcised?” Men's Health.Google Scholar
Bollinger, D., “Lost Boys: An Estimate of U.S. Circumcision-Related Infant Deaths,” Thymos: Journal of Boyhood Studies 4, no. 1 (2010): 78-90, at 83. Morris' attempt (Morris, B. J., Bailey, R. C., and Klausner, J. D. et al., “Review: A Critical Evaluation of Arguments Opposing Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Developed Countries,” AIDS Care 24, no. 12 (2012): 1565-75) to rebut this analysis mistakenly claims that Bollinger assumes 100% of the gender differential in deaths is due to circumcision; in fact Bollinger assumes that circumcision is responsible for 100% of the gender differential in those deaths that are due to the usual complications of circumcision, namely, hemorrhage and infection. One of the major difficulties in estimating the number of deaths in which infant circumcision played a contributory role is that most death certificates do not include the underlying condition or procedure that led to the death of the patient, but rather immediate cause of death such as exsanguination or overwhelming sepsis. For example, in a study of children with heritable disorders who died while in a pediatric intensive care unit, the underlying disorder was not listed on the death certificate 41% of the time. Cunniff, C., Carmack, J. L., Kirby, R. S., and Fiser, D. H., “Contribution of Heritable Disorders to Mortality in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit,” Pediatrics 95, no. 5 (1995): 678-681.Google Scholar
Circumstitions, Deaths from Circumcision, available at <www.circumstitions.com/deaths.html> (last visited October 31, 2013).+(last+visited+October+31,+2013).>Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e777.Google Scholar
DeMaria, J., Abdulla, A., and Pemberton, J. et al., “Are Physicians Performing Neonatal Circumcisions Well-Trained?” Canadian Urological Association Journal 7, nos. 7-8 (2013): 260-264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e772.Google Scholar
AAP Task Force on Circumcision 2012, “The AAP Task Force on Neonatal Circumcision: A Call for Respectful Dialogue,” Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no. 7 (2013): 442-443, at 442.Google Scholar
Garber, S. T., “The Circular Cut: Problematizing the Longevity of Civilization's Most Aggressively Defended Amputation,” Wesleyan University Thesis (2013) (hereinafter cited as “Garber Thesis”), at 69.Google Scholar
Darby, R., “Risks, Benefits, Complications and Harms: Neglected Factors in the Current Debate on Non-therapeutic Circumcision,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 25, no. 1 (2015): 1-34 (hereinafter cited as “Darby Kennedy”).Google Scholar
Royal Australasian College of Physicians, “Circumcision of Male Infants,” Sydney: Royal Australasian College of Physicians, 2010; see KNMG Report, supra note 50.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics, “Ritual Genital Cutting of Female Minors,” Pediatrics 125, no. 5 (2010): 1088-1093, available at <http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/5/1088t> (last visited May 13, 2016) (hereinafter cited as “AAP FGC Statement May 2010”).CrossRef+(last+visited+May+13,+2016)+(hereinafter+cited+as+“AAP+FGC+Statement+May+2010”).>Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics Withdraws Policy Statement on Female Genital Cutting, Press Release, available at <www2.aap.org/advocacy/releases/fgc-may27-2010.htm> (last visited April 18, 2016).+(last+visited+April+18,+2016).>Google Scholar
2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at Abstract (“Male circumcision does not appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/sensitivity or sexual satisfaction”).Google Scholar
Frisch, M., Aigrain, Y., and Barauskas, Y. et al., “Cultural Bias in the AAP's Technical Report and Policy Statement on Male Circumcision,” Pediatrics 131, no. 4 (2013): 796-800 (“Cultural Bias”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Lakshmanan, supra note 24; Warren, J. P. and Bigelow, J., “The Case against Circumcision,” British Journal of Sexual Medicine 21, no. 5 (1994): 6-8, at 6, 8.Google Scholar
Solinis, I. and Yiannaki, A., “Does Circumcision Improve Couples' Sex Life?” Journal of Men's Health and Gender 4, no. 3 (2007): 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, M., “Author's Response to: Does Sexual Function Survey in Denmark Offer any Support for Male Circumcision Having an Adverse Effect?” International Journal of Epidemiology 41, no. 1 (2011): 312-314 (hereinafter cited as “Frisch Reply”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, M., Lindholm, M., and Grønbæk, M., “Male Circumcision and Sexual Function in Men and Women: A Survey-Based, Cross-Sectional Study in Denmark,” International Journal of Epidemiology 40, no. 5 (2011): 1367-1381 (hereinafter cited as “Sexual Function”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, J., Freitas, R., and Amorim, R. et al., “Adult Circumcision and Male Sexual Health: A Retrospective Analysis,” Andrologia 46, no. 5 (2014): 459-464.Google Scholar
Sorrells, M. L., Snyder, J. L., and Reiss, M. D. et al., “Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds in the Adult Penis,” BJU International 99, no. 4 (2007): 864-869, 864; see Cold and Taylor, supra note 15, at 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronselaer, G. A., Schober, J. M., and Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L. et al., “Male Circumcision Decreases Penile Sensitivity as Measured in a Large Cohort,” BJU International 111, no. 5 (2013): 820-827. Note that this study has been criticized by Morris et al. and the critique was responded to by the original author. See <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.12128_10/full> (last visited April 19, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kigozi, G., Watya, S., and Polis, C. B. et al., “The Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Satisfaction and Function, Results from a Randomized Trial of Male Circumcision for Human Immunodefiency Virus Prevention, Rakai, Uganda,” BJU International 101 (2008): 65-70; Krieger, J. N., Mehta, S. D., and Bailey, R. C. et al., “Adult Male Circumcision: Effects on Sexual Function and Sexual Satisfaction in Kisumu, Kenya,” Journal of Sexual Medicine 5, no. 11 (2008): 2610-2622.Google Scholar
Morris, B., Waskett, J. H., and Gray, R. H., “Letter to the Editor: Does Sexual Function Survey in Denmark Offer Any Support for Male Circumcision Having an Adverse Effect?” International Journal of Epidemiology 41 (2012): 310-312. See also Morris and Krieger's “systematic review” that found “no difference” in sexual function between circumcised and intact men. B. J. Morris and J.N. Krieger, “Does Male Circumcision Affect Sexual Function, Sensitivity, or Satisfaction?: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Sexual Medicine 10, no. 11 (2013): 2644-2657. This opinion piece suffers from many problems including its reliance on the RCTs that have already been trenchantly critiqued by Frisch (see Frisch Reply, supra note 76), its strong reliance on self-citations, and its failure to mention the second author's conflict of interest. The authors fail to objectively weigh the evidence or perform their own calculations. Bossio, J. A., Pukall, C. F., and Steele, S., “A Review of the Current State of the Male Circumcision Literature,” Journal of Sexual Medicine 11, no. 12 (2014): 2847-2864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch Reply, supra note 76, at 313.Google Scholar
Fink, K. S., Carson, C. C., and DeVellis, R. F., “Adult Circumcision Outcomes Study: Effect on Erectile Function, Penile Sensitivity, Sexual Activity and Satisfaction,” Journal of Urology 167, no. 5 (2002): 2113-2116.Google Scholar
Bensley, G. A. and Boyle, G. J., “Effect of Male Circumcision on Female Arousal and Orgasm,” New Zealand Medical Journal 116, no. 1181 (2003): 595-596.Google Scholar
See Sexual Function, supra note 77.Google Scholar
See Cultural Bias, supra note 73, at 798.Google Scholar
Goldman, R., “The Psychological Impact of Circumcision,” BJU International 83, no. S1 (1999): 93-102. See also, Goldman, R., Circumcision The Hidden Trauma: How an American Cultural Practice Affects Infants and Ultimately Us All (Boston, MA: Vanguard Publications, 1997).Google Scholar
Rhinehart, J., “Neonatal Circumcision Reconsidered,” Transactional Analysis Journal 29 (1999): 215-221.Google Scholar
See Watson, Darby and Cox, and Hammond, all supra note 18.Google Scholar
See Hodges, supra note 20, at 37.Google Scholar
Hodges, F., “A Short History of the Institutionalization of Involuntary Sexual Mutilation in the United States,” in Denniston, G. C. and Milos, M. F., eds., Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy (New York: Plenum Press, 1997): at 17-40.Google Scholar
Hartman, W. and der Kinderund Jugendärzte, Berufsverbands, German Pediatric Association Condemns Circumcision: Expert Statement, available at <www.intactamerica.org/german_pediatrics_statement> (last visited April 19, 2016) (“BVKJ Statement”).+(last+visited+April+19,+2016)+(“BVKJ+Statement”).>Google Scholar
See Cultural Bias, supra note 64, at 796, 797.Google Scholar
Jagannath, V. A., Fedorowicz, Z., Sud, V., Verma, A. K., and Hajebrahimi, S., “Routine Neonatal Circumcision for the Prevention of Urinary Tract Inections in Infancy,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 14, no. 11 (2012): CD009129-CD009129.Google Scholar
Hoberman, A., Wald, E. R., and Hickey, R. W. et al., “Oral Versus Initial Intravenous Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections in Young Febrile Children,” Pediatrics 104, no. 1 Pt 1 (1999): 79-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wennerström, M., Hansson, S., and Hedner, T. et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure 16-26 Years after the First Urinary Tract Infection in Childhood,” Journal of Hypertension 18, no. 4 (2000): 485-491; Wennerström, M., Hansson, S., Jodal, U., and Stokland, E., “Primary and Acquired Renal Scarring in Boys and Girls with Urinary Tract Infection,” Journal of Pediatrics 136, no. 1 (2000): 30-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chessare, J. B., “Circumcision: Is the Risk of Urinary Tract Infection Really the Pivotal Issue?” Clinical Pediatrics (Philadelphia) 31, no. 2 (1992): 100-104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prais, D., Furman, R., and Amir, J., “Is Ritual Circumcision a Risk Factor for Neonatal Urinary Tract Infections?” Archives of Disease in Childhood 94, no. 3 (2009): 191-194; Toker, O., Schwartz, S., and Segal, G. et al., “A Costly Covenant: Ritual Circumcision and Urinary Tract Infection,” Israeli Medical Association Journal 12, no. 5 (2010): 262-265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Cultural Bias, supra note 73, at 797.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Adekoya, N. and Nolte, K. B., “Struck-by-Lightning Deaths in the United States,” Journal of Environmental Health 67, no. 9 (2005): 45-50; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, “How Dangerous Is Lightning?” available at <w. http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/jeh5_05_45-50.pdf> (last visited May 12, 2016). Estimated lightning strikes in United States is between 267 to 330 per year. New cases of penile cancer are approximately 200. Wingo, P. A., Tong, T., Bolden, S., “Cancer Statistics, 1995,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 45, no. 1 (1995): 8-30.Google Scholar
Daling, J. R., Madeleine, M. M., and Johnson, L. G. et al., “Penile Cancer: Importance of Circumcision, Human Papillomavirus and Smoking in In Situ and Invasive Disease,” International Journal of Cancer 116, no. 4 (2005): 606-616; Tseng, H.-F., Morgenstern, H., and Mack, T. et al., “Risk Factors for Penile Cancer: Results of a Population-Based Case-Control Study in Los Angeles County (United States),” Cancer Causes Control 12, no. 3 (2001): 267-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, M., Friis, S., Kjaer, S. K., and Melbye, M., “Falling Incidence of Penis Cancer in an Uncircumcised Population (Denmark 1943-90),” British Medical Journal 311, no. 7018 (1995): 1471.Google Scholar
Iversen, T., Tretli, S., Johansen, A., and Holte, T., “Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis and of the Cervix, Vulva and Vagina in Spouses: Is There Any Relationship? An Epidemiological Study from Norway 1960-92,” British Journal of Cancer 76, no. 5 (1997): 658-660.Google Scholar
Maiche, A. G., “Epidemiological Aspects of Cancer of the Penis in Finland,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention 1, no. 2 (1992): 153-158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, C. S. and Nectoux, J., “Epidemiology of Cancer of the Testis and Penis,” National Cancer Institute Monographs 53 (1979): 157-164.Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e788.Google Scholar
American Cancer Society, “Can Penile Cancer Be Prevented?” available at <www.cancer.org/cancer/penilecancer/detailedguide/penile-cancer-prevention> (last visited April 19, 2016).+(last+visited+April+19,+2016).>Google Scholar
Citations for the sixteen studies can be found at: Van Howe, R. S., “Routine Infant Circumcision: Vital Issues That the Circumcision Proponents May Be Overlooking,” in Denniston, G. C., Hodges, F. M., and Milos, M. F., eds., Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements (New York: Springer, 2013): at 29-54 (“Van Howe Overlooking”).Google Scholar
Auvert, B., Taljaard, D., and Lagarde, E. et al., “Randomized, Controlled Intervention Trial of Male Circumcision for Reduction of HIV Infection Risk: The ANRS 1265 Trial,” PLOS Medicine 2, no. 11 (2005): 1116-1122; Bailey, R. C., Moses, S., and Parker, C. B. et al., “Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Young Men in Kisumu, Kenya: A Randomised Controlled Trial,” The Lancet 369, no. 9562 (2007): 643-656; Gray, R. H., Kigozi, G., and Serwadda, D. et al., “Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Men in Rakai, Uganda: A Randomised Trial,” The Lancet 369, no. 9562 (2007): 657-666 (“Rakai RCT”).Google Scholar
Siegfried, N., Muller, M., Deeks, J. J., and Volmink, J., “Male Circumcision for Prevention of Heterosexual Acquisition of HIV in Men,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2 (2009): CD003362.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J. and Hill, G., “Sub-Saharan African Randomised Clinical Trials into Male Circumcision and HIV Transmission: Methodological, Ethical and Legal Concerns,” Journal of Law & Medicine 19, no. 2 (2011): 316-334 (“Boyle and Hill”).Google Scholar
Van Howe, R. S. and Storms, M. R., “How the Circumcision Solution in Africa Will Increase HIV Infections,” Journal of Public Health in Africa 2, no. 1 (2011): e4 (“Van Howe and Storms”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowsett, G. W. and Couch, M., “Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Is There Really Enough of the Right Kind of Evidence?” Reproductive Health Matters 15, no. 29 (2007): 33-44; Green, L. W., McAllister, R. G., Peterson, K. W., and Travis, J. W., “Male Circumcision Is Not the HIV ‘Vaccine’ We Have Been Waiting For!” Future HIV Therapy 2, no. 3 (2008):193-199; Sidler, D., Smith, J., and Rode, H., “Neonatal Circumcision Does Not Reduce HIV/AIDS Infection Rates,” South African Medical Journal 98, no. 10 (2008): 762-766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Van Howe and Storms, supra note 114; see Boyle and Hill, supra note 113; Brewer, D. D., Potterat, J. J., and Brody, S., “Male Circumcision in HIV Prevention,” The Lancet 369, no. 9573 (2007): 1597; Green, L. W., Travis, J. W., and McAllister, R. G. et al., “Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Insufficient Evidence and Neglected External Validity,” American Journal of Preventive Health 39, no. 5 (2010): 479-482.Google Scholar
Mishra, V., Medley, A., and Hong, R. et al., “Levels and Spread of HIV Seroprevalence and Associated Factors: Evidence from National Household Surveys,” Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Reports No. 22 (Calverton, Maryland: Macro International, 2009); Garenne, M., “Long-Term Population Effect of Male Circumcision in Generalised HIV Epidemics in Sub-Saharan Africa,” African Journal of AIDS Research 7, no. 1 (2008): 1-8.Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e777.Google Scholar
Morris, B. J., Bailey, R. C., and Klausner, J. D. et al., “A Critical Evaluation of Arguments Opposing Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention in Developed Countries,” AIDS Care 24, no. 12 (2012): 1565-1575. This paper evidences many of the fatal flaws evident in Morris' work — frequent self-citations which are bootstrapped into being assumed to be conclusive, poorly prepared letters to the editor that are misrepresented as “decisive refutations” of original research while omitting mention of pertinent authorial replies, and so on. We invite our readers to review Morris' work and his citations, many of which clearly lack substantial merit.Google Scholar
Millett, G. A., Flores, S. A., Marks, G., Reed, J. B., and Herbst, J. H., “Circumcision Status and Risk of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections among Men Who Have Sex with Men,” JAMA 300, no. 14 (2008): 1674-1684, Errata, JAMA 301, no. 11 (2009): 1126-1129; see Cultural Bias, supra note 73, at 798; Darby, R. and Van Howe, R., “Not a Surgical Vaccine: There Is No Case for Boosting Infant Male Circumcision to Combat Heterosexual Transmission of HIV in Australia,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 35, no. 5 (2011): 459-465, at 461.Google Scholar
Wiysonge, C. S., Kongnyuy, E. J., and Shey, M., et al., “Male Circumcision for Prevention of Homosexual Acquisition of HIV in Men,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 6, Art. No.: CD007496 (2011).Google Scholar
Garenne, M., Giamland, A., and Perrey, C., “Male Circumcision and HIV Control in Africa: Questioning Scientific Evidence and the Decision-making Process,” in Giles-Vernick, T. and Webb, J. L. A. Jr., eds., Global Health in Africa: Historical Perspectives on Disease Control (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2013): 185-210, at 190 (“Garenne Male Circumcision and HIV Control”).Google Scholar
See Van Howe Overlooking, supra note 110, at 42. One North American study has found a significant positive association between being circumcised and higher prevalence of HIV. Rodriguez-Diaz, C. E., Clatts, M. C., and Jovet-Toledo, G. G. et al., “More Than Foreskin: Circumcision Status, History of HIV/STI, and Sexual Risk in a Clinic-Based Sample of Men in Puerto Rico,” Journal of Sexual Medicine 9, no. 11 (2012): 2933-2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Garenne Male Circumcision and HIV Control, supra note 122, at 197, 198.Google Scholar
See “Cultural Bias,” supra note 73, at 798.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id., at 797. The word “condom” does not appear in the 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 5.Google Scholar
Buchbinder, S. P., Vittinghoff, E., and Heagerty, P.J., et al., “Sexual Risk, Nitrite Inhalant Use, and Lack of Circumcision Associated with HIV Seroconversion in Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 39, no. 1 (2005): 82-89; Sánchez, J., Sal, Y, and Rosas, V. G. et al., “Male Circumcision and Risk of HIV Acquisition among MSM,” AIDS 25, no. 4 (2011): 519-523; Koblin, B.A., Mayer, K. H., and Noonan, E. et al., “Sexual Risk Behaviors, Circumcision Status, and Preexisting Immunity to Adenovirus type 5 among Men Who Have Sex with Men Participating in a Randomized HIV-1 Vaccine Efficacy Trial: Step Study,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 60, no. 4 (2012): 405-413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchbinder, S., “When Is Good Good Enough for HIV-1 Prophylaxis?” The Lancet Infectious Diseases 14, no. 11 (2014): 1024-1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Brady Pitts, supra note 23.Google Scholar
Lang, D., “Elective Child Circumcision and Catholic Moral Principles,” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 12, no. 1 (2012); 649-677, at 649-650.Google Scholar
Dekkers, W., “Routine (Non-Religious) Neonatal Circumcision and Bodily Integrity: A Translatlantic Dialogue,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19, no. 2 (2009): 125-146, at 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, R., “Ethics Needs Principles—Four Can Encompass the Rest—and Respect for Autonomy Should Be ‘First among Equals,’” Journal of Medical Ethics 29, no. 7 (2003): 307-312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tasmania Law Reform Institute, Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision, Final Report No. 17 (August 2012), at 50 (“Tasmania Report”); Darby, R. J. L., “The Child's Right to an Open Future: Is the Principle Applicable to Non-Therapeutic Circumcision?” Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no. 7 (2013): 463-468 (hereinafter cited as “Darby Tasmania”).Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics, “Informed Consent, Parental Permission, and Assent in Pediatric Practice,” Pediatrics 95, no. 2 (1995): 314-317, reaffirmed May 2011, available at <http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/130/2/e467.short> (last visited April 20, 2016) (hereinafter cited as “AAP Bioethics Committee Informed Consent”).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016)+(hereinafter+cited+as+“AAP+Bioethics+Committee+Informed+Consent”).>Google Scholar
Diekema, D., Affidavit of a Highly-Qualified Doctor in a Botched Circumcision Case (January 17, 2006), available at <www.circumstitions.com/ethics-diekema.html> (last visited April 20, 2016) (hereinafter cited as “Diekema Affidavit”).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016)+(hereinafter+cited+as+“Diekema+Affidavit”).>Google Scholar
See Cultural Bias, supra note 73, at 800.Google Scholar
See Diekema Affidavit, supra note 136.Google Scholar
Committee on Fetus and Newborn, “Circumcision,” in American Academy of Pediatrics, Hospital Care of Newborn Infants, 5th ed. (Evanston, Illinois: American Academy of Pediatrics, 1971): at 110; British Medical Association, “The Law and Ethics of Male Circumcision – Guidance for Doctors,” Journal of Medical Ethics 30, no. 3 (2004): 259-263.Google Scholar
See Darby Tasmania, supra note 134.Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Unnecessary Medical Services, available at <https://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion219.page> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
American Medical Association, AMA Policies on GLBT Issues, available at <http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/about-ama/our-people/member-groups-sections/glbt-advisory-committee/ama-policy-regarding-sexual-orientation.shtml> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e759.Google Scholar
See Svoboda, J. S. and Van Howe, R. S., “Out of Step: Fatal Flaws in the Latest AAP Policy Report on Neonatal Circumcision,” Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no. 7 (2013): 434-441, at 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See AAP Bioethics Committee Informed Consent, supra note 135, at 315 (emphasis added).Google Scholar
See Brady Pitts, supra note 23.Google Scholar
Svoboda, J. S., “Newborn Male Circumcision Is Unethical and Should Be Illegal,” paper presented at Twentieth Pitts Lectureship in Medical Ethics, Charleston, South Carolina, October 18, 2013.Google Scholar
Hodges, F. M., Svoboda, J. S., and Van Howe, R. S., “Prophylactic Interventions on Children: Balancing Human Rights with Public Health,” Journal of Medical Ethics 28, no. 1 (2002): 10-16 (“Prophylactic Interventions”).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Darby Kennedy.Google Scholar
See Watson, Darby and Cox, and Hammond, all supra note 18.Google Scholar
German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch)§ 1631d (“German Law”).Google Scholar
Merkel, R. and Putzke, H., “After Cologne: Male Circumcision and the Law,” Journal of Medical Ethics 39, no. 7 (2013): 444-449 (hereinafter cited as “Merkel and Putzke JME”); J. S. Svoboda, Welcome to the New Era: Four Fatal Flaws in the German Bill Legalizing Male Circumcision, paper presented at Promoting Children's Rights in Europe--Recent Developments, Keele, United Kingdom, September 16, 2013, available at <http://arclaw.org/sites/default/files/20130916-j-steven-svoboda-welcome-to-the-new-era-four-fatal-flaws-in-the-german-bill-legalizing-male-circumcision-keele-uk.pdf> (last visited May 4, 2016) (hereinafter cited as “Svoboda Keele”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See BVKJ Statement, supra note 93.Google Scholar
Anonymous, “Circumcision Breaches Human Rights of the Child,” The Local, September 28, 2013, available at <http://www.thelocal.se/20130928/50496> (last visited May 26, 2016).+(last+visited+May+26,+2016).>Google Scholar
See KNMG Report, supra note 50.Google Scholar
Intact News, “South African Medical Association Denounces Circumcision of Infants,” available at <http://intactnews.org/node/40/1309097685/south-african-medical-association-denounces-circumcision-infants> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Anonymous, “Ritual Circumcision Ban Recommended in Sweden and Denmark by Medical Associations,” Huffington Post, January 27, 2014, available at <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/27/circumcision-ban-sweden-denmark_n_4674547.html> (last visited May 12, 2016).+(last+visited+May+12,+2016).>Google Scholar
Lääkäriliitto, Suomen. Poikien ympärileikkaus, available at <http://www.laakariliitto.fi/uutiset/kannanotot/ymparileikkaus.html> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Guiborg, C., “Swedish Docs in Circumcision Protest,” The Local, February 19, 2012, available at <http://www.thelocal.se/20120219/39200> (last visited May 2, 2016).+(last+visited+May+2,+2016).>Google Scholar
See KNMG Report, supra note 50, at 12-14.Google Scholar
Queensland Law Reform Commission, Circumcision of Male Infants, Miscellaneous Paper 6 (December 1993), at 13-16.Google Scholar
See Tasmania Report, supra note 134, at 71, 82, 87. Brian Morris and colleagues also critiqued this report at length in Bates, M. J., Ziegler, J. B., and Kennedy, S. E. et al., “Recommendation by a Law Body to Ban Infant Male Circumcision Has Serious Worldwide Implications for Pediatric Practice and Human Rights,” BMC Pediatrics 13 (2013): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landgericht Köln; 7 May 2012; Urteil Ns 169/11 (“Cologne case”).Google Scholar
German Law, supra note 152.Google Scholar
See Svoboda Keele, supra note 153; Merkel and Putzke JME, supra note 153, at 448-449.Google Scholar
United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child, Concluding Observations on the Second to Fourth Periodic Reports of Israel, Adopted by the Committee at Its Sixty-Third Session (27 May – 14 June 2013), CRC/C/ISR/CO/2-4, at paragraphs 41-42, available at <http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/co/CRC-C-ISR-CO-2-4.pdf> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Jewish Journal, “Ban on Non-Medical Circumcision Introduced in Sweden,” available at <http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/ban_on_non_medical_circumcision_introduced_in_sweden> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Council of Europe, “Recommendation: Children's Right to Physical Integrity,” available at <http://www.assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?FileID=20176&lang=E> (last visited April 20, 2016); Council of Europe, “Resolution: Children's Right to Physical Integrity,” available at <http://www.assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-DocDetails-EN.asp?FileID=20174&lang=EN> (last visited April 20, 2016). (last visited April 20, 2016); Council of Europe, “Resolution: Children's Right to Physical Integrity,” available at (last visited April 20, 2016).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Council+of+Europe,+“Recommendation:+Children's+Right+to+Physical+Integrity,”+available+at++(last+visited+April+20,+2016);+Council+of+Europe,+“Resolution:+Children's+Right+to+Physical+Integrity,”+available+at++(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Anonymous, “MPs Support Law Proposed to Ban Circumcision,” Finland Times, April 3, 2014, available at <http://www.finlandtimes.fi/health/2014/04/03/5886/MPs-support-law-proposed-to-ban-circumcision> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Court of Zutphen [Austria], Family Division, Case Number 83927 JE RK 07-110, July 31, 2007.Google Scholar
OLG Frankfurt a.M., Beschluss vom 21. 8. 2007, Az. 4 W 12/07.Google Scholar
OLG Hamm, Beschluss vom 30. 8. 2013, Az. 3 UF 133/13.Google Scholar
Adler, P.W., “Is Circumcision Legal?” Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest 16, no. 3 (2013): 439-483 (“Adler Circumcision Legal”).Google Scholar
Bond, S. L., “State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?” John Marshall Law Review 32 (1999): 353-380.Google Scholar
See AAP FGC Statement May 2010, supra note 70.Google Scholar
See Garber Thesis, supra note 67, at 72-73; Van Howe, R. S., “The American Academy of Pediatrics and Female Genital Cutting: When National Organizations Are Guided by Personal Agendas,” Ethics & Medicine 27, no. 3 (2011): 165-173.Google Scholar
Davis, D., “Male and Female Genital Alteration: A Collision Course with the Law?” Health Matrix 11, no. 2 (2000-2001): 487-570, at 487.Google Scholar
See list in Svoboda, J. S. and Darby, R., “A Rose by Any Other Name? Symmetry and Asymmetry in Male and Female Genital Cutting,” in Zabus, C., ed., Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies around Excision and Circumcision (New York: Rodopi, 2009):at 249-295.Google Scholar
Svoboda, J. S., Seminar on Pediatric Controversies, Twentieth Pitts Lectureship in Medical Ethics, Charleston, South Carolina, October 19, 2013 (hereinafter cited as “Svoboda Pitts”).Google Scholar
18 USC Sec. 116, Female genital mutilation, Congressional Findings, Section (3).Google Scholar
Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 169 (1944).Google Scholar
Newell, P., “The Child's Right to Physical Integrity,” International Journal of Children's Rights 1, no. 1 (1993): 101-104, at 102.Google Scholar
Price, C. P., “Male Non-Therapeutic Circumcision: The Legal and Ethical Issues,” in Denniston, G. C., Hodges, F. M., and Milos, M. F., eds., Male and Female Circumcision: Medical, Legal and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (New York: Kluwer Academic, 1999): 425-454, at 437.Google Scholar
Boyle, G. J., Svoboda, J. S., Price, C. P., and Turner, J. N., “Circumcision of Healthy Boys: Criminal Assault?” Journal of Law and Medicine 7, no. 3 (2000): 301-310, at 301.Google Scholar
Somerville, M., The Ethical Canary: Science, Society and the Human Spirit (Toronto: Viking Press, 2000): at 204-205.Google Scholar
Brigman, W. E., “Circumcision as Child Abuse: The Legal and Constitutional Issues,” Journal of Family Law 23, no. 3 (1985): 337-357.Google Scholar
California Penal Code Section 273.4.Google Scholar
California Penal Code Section 273a(b) (child abuse).Google Scholar
California Penal Code Section 240 (assault) prohibits willfully acting in a way likely to result in the application of force to another.Google Scholar
California Penal Code Section §§ 11165.1, 1165,1(a),(b)(3)..Google Scholar
Idaho Criminal Code § 18-1506A(2)(b).Google Scholar
720 Illinois Compiled Statutes §§ 5/12-32(b) and 5/12-33(b) (2).Google Scholar
Mississippi Code § 97-5-39(2)(b)(iv).Google Scholar
California Penal Code § 667.83.Google Scholar
Svoboda, J. S., “Routine Infant Male Circumcision: Examining the Human Rights and Constitutional Issues, ” in Denniston, G. C. and Milos, M. F., eds., Sexual Mutilations: A Human Tragedy (New York: Plenum Press, 1997): 205-215, at 211 (“Svoboda Routine Infant Male Circumcision”).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Delaware Code § 1703(10).Google Scholar
Minnesota Statutes § 147.09(10).Google Scholar
Montana Code § 37-3-103(1)(g).Google Scholar
Wisconsin Statutes § 448.03(2)(g).Google Scholar
New Jersey Administrative Code § 13:35-2A.17.Google Scholar
Union Pacific Railway Company v. Botsford, 141 U.S. 250, 251 (1891).Google Scholar
Neff, C., “Woman, Womb, and Bodily Integrity,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 3, no. 2 (1991): 327-353, at 328-329.Google Scholar
[UK] Royal Courts of Justice, In the matter of B and G (Children) (No 2), Neutral Citation Number [2015] EWFC 3, Case Number LJ13C00295, January 14, 2015, available at <https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/BandG_2_.pdf> (last visited May 8, 2016).+(last+visited+May+8,+2016).>Google Scholar
Earp, B., On the supposed distinction between culture and religion: A brief comment on Sir James Munby's decision in the matter of B and G (children) Practical Ethics, available at <http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2015/02/on-the-supposed-distinction-between-culture-and-religion-a-comment-on-sir-james-munbys-decision-in-the-matter-of-b-and-g-children/> (last visited May 8, 2016). (last visited May 8, 2016).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Earp,+B.,+On+the+supposed+distinction+between+culture+and+religion:+A+brief+comment+on+Sir+James+Munby's+decision+in+the+matter+of+B+and+G+(children)+Practical+Ethics,+available+at++(last+visited+May+8,+2016).>Google Scholar
[UK] High Court of Justice, Family Division, Re L and B (Children), Neutral Citation Number [2016] EWHC 849 (Fam), April 5, 2016, available at <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2016/849.html> (last visited May 8, 2016).+(last+visited+May+8,+2016).>Google Scholar
International NGO Council on Violence against Children, Violating Children's Rights: Harmful Practices Based on Tradition, Culture, Religion or Superstition (2012), at 22.Google Scholar
The Nereide, 13 U.S. 388, 423 (1815).Google Scholar
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. G.A. Resolution 217A (III). United Nations Document No. A/810 (1948). Adopted December 10, 1948 (“Universal Declaration”).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200 A [XXI]. Adopted December 16, 1966 (“Covenant”)Google Scholar
Convention on the Rights of the Child, UN GA Resolution 44/25, November 20, 1989 (“Convention”).Google Scholar
See Covenant, supra note 210.Google Scholar
See Universal Declaration, supra note 209.Google Scholar
See Convention, supra note 211.Google Scholar
See Universal Declaration, supra note 209.Google Scholar
See Covenant, supra note 210.Google Scholar
See Convention, supra note 211.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Tarhan v. Turkey, European Court of Human Rights, Application Number 9078/06, decided July 17, 2012.Google Scholar
Statute of the International Court of Justice, June 26, 1945, art. 38, 59 Stat. 1055, T.S. 993; Gunning, I., “Modernizing Customary International Law: The Challenge of Human Rights,” Virginia Journal of International Law 31 (1991): 211-247, at 214.Google Scholar
Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 111, comments d and e.Google Scholar
Statute of the International Court of Justice, June 26, 1945, art. 38, 59 Stat. 1055, T.S. 993; see Gunning, supra note 221, at 214.Google Scholar
Carpenter, R. C., Forgetting Children Born of War: Setting the Human Rights Agenda in Bosnia and Beyond (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010): at 18.Google Scholar
See Svoboda Routine Infant Male Circumcision, supra note 196, at 205-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Cologne case, supra note 164.Google Scholar
See Merkel and Putzke JME, supra note 153.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Eberle, E. J., “The German Idea of Freedom,” Oregon Review of International Law 10 (2008): 1-76, at 4-5.Google Scholar
Prince v. Massachusetts, supra note 182.Google Scholar
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878), at 166-67.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics, “Religious Objections to Medical Care,” Pediatrics 99, no. 2 (1997): 279-281.Google Scholar
Svoboda, J. S., Van Howe, R. S., and Dwyer, J. G., “Informed Consent for Neonatal Circumcision: An Ethical and Legal Conundrum,” Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 17, no. 1 (2000): 61-133 (“Svoboda Informed Consent”).Google Scholar
Dwyer, J. G., The Relationship Rights of Children (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See AAP Bioethics Committee Informed Consent, supra note 135, at 316.Google Scholar
Id., at 315.Google Scholar
Id., at 315.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics, “Religious Exemptions from Child Abuse Statutes,” Pediatrics 81, no. 1 (1988): 169-171.Google Scholar
KNMG Press Release, Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) to Discourage Non-Therapeutic Circumcision of Male Minors, May 27, 2010, available at <http://www.reuters.com/article/us-dutch-circumcision-idUSTRE64Q52H20100527> (last visited May 12, 2016).+(last+visited+May+12,+2016).>Google Scholar
Tortorella v. Castro, 140 Cal.App.4th 1, 43 Cal.Rptr.3d 853, Cal.App. 2 Dist. (2006) (emphasis added).Google Scholar
See generally, e.g., Ervin, R.C., “Claims Arising from a Breach of a Fiduciary Duty,” University of North Carolina School of Government, North Carolina Superior Court Judges Benchbook (2009), available at <http://dev.benchbook.sog.unc.edu/sites/benchbook.sog.unc.edu/files/pdf/Breach%20of%20Fiduciary%20Duty%20Claims%20-%20HC.pdf> (last visited May 3, 2016).+(last+visited+May+3,+2016).>Google Scholar
Giannetti, M. R., “Circumcision and the American Academy of Pediatrics: Should Scientific Misconduct Result in Trade Association Liability,” Iowa Law Review 85, no. 4 (2000): 1507-1568 (hereinafter cited as “Giannetti”).Google Scholar
Id., at 1567-1568.Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6.Google Scholar
See Giannetti, supra note 241. See also Adler Circumcision Legal, supra note 174, at 471-473.Google Scholar
See 2012 AAP Technical Report, supra note 6, at e777.Google Scholar
Adler, P. W., “Is It Lawful to Use Medicaid to Pay for Circumcision?” Journal of Law and Medicine 19, no. 2 (2011): 335-353 (hereinafter cited as “Adler Medicaid”).Google Scholar
See AAP FGC Statement May 2010, supra note 70.Google Scholar
See Adler Medicaid, supra note 246.Google Scholar
Id., at notes 2, 13-17.Google Scholar
See KNMG Report, supra note 50.Google Scholar
See Svoboda Routine Infant Male Circumcision, supra note 196, at 208-209.Google Scholar
National Association of Circumcision Information Resource Centers, “Medical Association Position Papers,” available at <http://www.nocirc.org/position/> (last visited April 20, 2016).+(last+visited+April+20,+2016).>Google Scholar
Doctors Opposing Circumcision, supra note 8 (“Parents should be aware that the so-called medical information in the AAP Circumcision Policy Statement is fully tainted by easily identified conflicts-of-interest and financial motives.”).Google Scholar