Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:18:00.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hippocratic Bargain and Health Information Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Mark A. Rothstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the fourth century, B.C.E., the Oath of Hippocrates has been the starting point in analyzing the obligations of physicians to protect the privacy and confidentiality interests of their patients. The pertinent provision of the Oath reads as follows: “What I may see or hear in the course of the treatment or even outside of the treatment in regard to the life of men, which on no account must be spread abroad, I will keep to myself, holding such things shameful to be spoken about.”

This part of the Oath is subject to more than one interpretation, but its commonly accepted meaning provides the ethical foundation for the physician’s duty of confidentiality. The Oath expressly declares that a physician’s obligation of confidentiality applies beyond matters of medical care. At a time when there were no hospitals or physician offices, patients received medical care in their homes or in public places. Physicians treating patients in their homes could be expected to see and hear a wide range of activities that might be considered embarrassing, immoral, or even illegal.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 7 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“Oath of Hippocrates,” reprinted in Reich, W. T., ed., Encyclopedia of Bioethics, rev. ed., vol. 5 (New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan, 1995): At Appendix, p. 2632.Google Scholar
Miles, S. H., The Hippocratic Oath and the Ethics of Medicine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004): at 149.Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics of the American Medical Association 2008–2009 ed. § 5.051 – Confidentiality of Medical Information Postmortem, American Medical Association, Chicago, 2008, at 165.Google Scholar
See Miles, , supra note 2, at 150.Google Scholar
Id., at 151.Google Scholar
Higgins, G., “The History of Confidentiality in Medicine: The Physician-Patient Relationship,” Canadian Family Physician 35 (April 1989): 921–926; Moskop, J., “From Hippocrates to HIPAA: Privacy and Confidentiality in Emergency Medicine – Part I: Conceptual, Moral, and Legal Foundations,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 45, no. 1 (2005): 53–59; Slowther, A. and Kleinman, I., “Confidentiality,” in Singer, P. A. and Viens, A. M., eds., The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008): At 45; Winslade, W. J., “Confidentiality,” in Reich, W. T., ed., Encyclopedia of Bioethics, rev. ed., vol. 1 (New York: Simon & Schuster McMillan, 1995): At 453.Google Scholar
Gellman, R. M., “Prescribing Privacy: The Uncertain Role of the Physician in the Protection of Patient Privacy,” North Carolina Law Review 62, no. 2 (1984): 255–294.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. A. and Talbott, M. K., “Compelled Disclosure of Health Information: Protecting Against the Greatest Potential Threat to Privacy,” JAMA 295, no. 24 (2006): 2882–2885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, M. A. and Talbott, M. K., “Compelled Authorizations for Disclosure of Health Records: Magnitude and Implications,” American Journal of Bioethics 7, no. 3 (2007): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegler, M., “Confidentiality in Medicine – A Decrepit Concept,” New England Journal of Medicine 307, no. 24 (1982): 1518–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 1520–1521.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. A., “Health Privacy in the Electronic Age,” Journal of Legal Medicine 28, no. 4 (2007): 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Letter to Leavitt, Michael O., Secretary of Health of Human Services, June 21, 2007, available at <http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/070621lt2.pdf> (last visited December 11, 2009).+(last+visited+December+11,+2009).>Google Scholar
42 U.S.C. § 290ee-3 (2008).Google Scholar
See 42 C.F.R. Part 2 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris Interactive, “Many U.S. Adults Are Satisfied with Use of Their Personal Health Information: Substantial Minority Still Withhold Information from Health Providers Due to Worries About Security of Medical Data,” March 27, 2007, available at <http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=743> (last visited December 11, 2009).+(last+visited+December+11,+2009).>Google Scholar
Department of Health and Human Services, Health Insurance Reform: Security Standards, 68 Federal Register 8334, 8335 (February 20, 2003); Hodge, J. G. Jr. et al., “Identifiable Health Information and the Public's Health: Practice, Research and Policy,” in Goodman, R. A. et al., eds., Law in Public Health Practice, 2d ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007): 238–261, at 246.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Barnum, J. F., “The Misinformation Era: The Fall of the Medical Record,” Annals of Internal Medicine 110, no. 6 (1989): 482–484; Beers, M. H., Munekata, M., and Storrie, M., “The Accuracy of Medication Histories in the Hospital Medical Records of Elderly Persons,” Journal of the American Geriatric Society 38, no. 11 (1990): 1183–1187; Romm, F. J. and Putnam, S. M., “The Validity of the Medical Record,” Medical Care 19, no. 3 (1981): 310–315.Google Scholar
See Rothstein, , supra note 12, at 492–493.Google Scholar
National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Letter to Leavittt, Michael O., Secretary of Health and Human Services, June 20, 2008, available at <http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/080220lt.pdf> (last visited December 11, 2009).+(last+visited+December+11,+2009).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Pritts, J. and Connor, K., The Implementaion of E-Consent Mechanisms in Three Countries: Canada, England, and the Netherlands (The Ability to Mask or Limit Access to Health Data), 2007, available at <http://ihcrp.georgetown.edu/pdf/prittse-consent.pdf> (last visited August 10, 2009).+(last+visited+August+10,+2009).>Google Scholar
Chalmers, J. and Muir, R., “Patient Privacy and Confidentiality,” British Medical Journal 326, no. 7392 (2003): 725–726, at 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45 C.F.R. § 164.502(b) (2008).Google Scholar
See Hasday, L., “The Hippocratic Oath as Literary Text: A Dialog between Law and Medicine,” Yale Journal of Health Policy and Ethics 2, no. 2 (2002): 299–323.Google Scholar