Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T22:07:36.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jewish Religious Law in the Modern (and Postmodern) World*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Ze'ev W. Falk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The end of the 20th century demonstrates not only a series of encounters between different religious and ethnic traditions but also between such traditions and secularism. An example for the latter is the cultural phenomenon of Jewish Religious Law vis-a-vis Modernization and Postmodernism. The following may therefore be seen as a case study illustrating the problems and options arising in such encounters during the next century.

Jewish religious law (halakhah) is that part of Jewish tradition, defining a Jew's duties towards God and fellow human beings. It is part of a more comprehensive concept, the divine teaching (torah), including narratives (agadah) as well as law (halakhah), and morals (derekh ‘erets) as well as matters of faith ('emunah). This teaching is contained not only in the Pentateuch and in Holy Scripture, but even more so in the oral traditions of the sages. Morals and faith are therefore complementaries to Jewish religious law, and rules of the second order to control it.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 465 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Extended version of the Gruss Lecture delivered at Harvard Law School on 11/22/94. The author thanks Professor J.H.H. Weiler for the invitation and hospitality as well as the Editor for her constructive critique of former versions.

References

1. Cuddihy, John Murray, The Ordeal of Civility 165 (Beacon, 1987)Google Scholar; Sacks, Jonathan, Crisis and Covenant; Jewish Thought After the Holocaust 4, 14 (Manchester U Press, 1992)Google Scholar.

2. The Protestant equivalent to the rejection of modernism and biblical criticism is called fundamentalism, named after a series of theological pamphlets “The Fundamentals” (1910-15). In a sense, the counterpoint to this attitude became later ecumenism and dialogue.

For Christian Modernism see Reardon, Bernard M.G., Roman Catholic Modernism (Adam & Charles Black, 1970)Google Scholar; Reardon, Bernard M.G., Modernism, Christian in 10 Encyclopedia of Religion 7 (Macmillan, 1987)Google Scholar. For Modernity and Religion see Weber, Max, Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1936)Google Scholar; Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., Tradition, Change and Modernity (John Wiley & Sons, 1973)Google Scholar; Berger, Peter, The Sacred Canopy (Doubleday & Co, 1967)Google Scholar; Luckmann, Thomas, The Invisible Religion (Macmillan, 1967)Google Scholar; Berger, Peter, Berger, Brigitte & Kellner, Hansfried, The Homeless Mind (Random House, 1973)Google Scholar.

3. Another analogy is, perhaps, the view of Gush 'Emunim (Faithful Settlers), describing Messianic-Activist Zionism. Friedman, Compare Menachem, Jewish Zealots; Conservative versus Innovative in Silberstein, Laurence J., ed, Jewish Fundamentalism in Comparative Perspective; Religion, Ideology and the Crisis of Modernity 148–163 (New York U Press, 1993)Google Scholar. Friedman describes the former faction as “conservative fundamentalists” and the latter as “innovative (or revolutionary) fundamentalists”.

4. For analogous developments in Islam see Rahman, Fazlur, Revival and Reform in Islam, in Cambridge History of Islam 632 (Cambridge U Press, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Wilfred Cantwell, Islam in Modern History (Princeton U Press, 1957)Google Scholar; von Gruenebaum, Gustave E., Modern Islam (U of California Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Gibb, Hamilton A.R., The Heritage of Islam in the Modern World, 1 Intl J of Middle East Studies 3-17, 221–237 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; 2 Intl J Middle East Studies 129–147 (1991)Google Scholar.

5. Bentham, Jeremy, Of Laws in General (1782) (Athlone, 1970)Google Scholar; Mill, John Stuart, Utilitarianism (Parker, Son & Bourn, 1863)Google Scholar.

6. von Savigny, Friedrich C., Of the Vocation of our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence 1831 (Ayer, 1975)Google Scholar; Maine, Henry Sumner, Ancient Law (J. Murray, 1861)Google Scholar.

7. von Ihering, Rudolph, Law as a Means to an End (The Boston Book Co, 1913)Google Scholar; Ehrlich, Eugen, Sociology and Jurisprudence (Harvard U Press, Moll, Walter translation, 1936)Google Scholar; Pound, Roscoe, Jurisprudence (West Publishing Co, 1959)Google Scholar; Pound, Roscoe, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Yale U Press, 1954)Google Scholar.

8. See for instance Ginzberg, Louis, Zechariah Frankel: Positive- Historical Judaism, and Kaplan, Mordecai M., The Problem of Jewish Law, both in Siegel, Seymour, ed, Conservative Judaism and Jewish Law 1–26 (The Rabbinical Assembly, 1977)Google Scholar.

9. Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (J. Murray, 1832)Google Scholar; Kelsen, Hans, The Pure Theory of Law and Analytical Jurisprudence (Peter Smith, 1941)Google Scholar.

10. Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of the Law (Yale U Press, 2nd ed, 1969)Google Scholar; Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Harvard U Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Dworkin, Ronald M., A Matter of Principle (Harvard U Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

11. Llewellyn, Karl N., Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice (U of Chicago Press, 1962)Google Scholar; Cohen, Felix S., The Legal Conscience (Yale U Press, 1960)Google Scholar.

12. The research of Jacob Katz, Menachem Friedman and Mosheh Samet seem to be the beginning of this method.

13. JT Pe'ah 2:6, 17a; Wayiqra Rabba 22:1; Shemot Rabba 47:1.

14. Joseph, Compare Sa‘adyah ben, Book of Doctrines and Beliefs 3:6Google Scholar in Lewy, Hans, Altmann, Alexander, Heinemann, Isaak, eds, Three Jewish Philosophers 111 (Altheneum, 1973)Google Scholar; Maimonides, , Commentary to Mishnah, Sanhedrin 10:1Google Scholar; Maimonides, , Guide of the Perplexed, 2:39Google Scholar; Albo, Joseph, Book of Fundaments, 3:13Google Scholar.

15. See my Dat haNetsach weTsorkhey Sha‘ah (Mesharim, 1986)Google Scholar (Religious Law between Eternity and Change).

16. Maimonides, , Guide of the Perplexed, 3:41Google Scholar.

17. de Spinoza, Benedictus, Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (G. Bell & Son, 1883)Google Scholar.

18. See the statement of Jewish Law according to an orthodox view: Eton, Menachem, Jewish Law; History, Sources, Principles (Jewish Publication Society, 1994) (4 vols)Google Scholar.

19. See Jacob, Walter, ed, American Reform Responsa, 1889-1983 (Central Conference, 1983)Google Scholar; Freehof, Solomon B., Reform Responsa (Hebrew Union College Press, 1969–1980)Google Scholar; “Reform Judaism: A Centenary Prospective” adopted by the Central Conference of American Rabbis in 1976Google Scholar.

20. Jacobs, Compare Louis, A Tree of Life; Diversity, Flexibility and Creativity in Jewish Life (Oxford U Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Dorff, Elliot N. & Rosett, Arthur, A Living Tree; The Roots and Growth of Jewish Law (State U New York Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

21. Eisenstein, Compare Ira, Mordekhai M. Kaplan and Halakhah in Brauner, Ronald A., ed, 2 Jewish Civilization 145 (Reconstructionist Rabbinical College, 1981)Google Scholar; Cohen, Jack J., The End of Halakhah, 8(2) Conservative Judaism 9 (1952)Google Scholar.

22. See Gordis, Robert, ed, Halakhah, Authority and the Future of Judaism, 29 Judaism 4–109 (1980)Google Scholar.

23. Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 11 (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

24. Meyer, Compare Michael A., Response to Modernity, A History of the Reform Movement in Judaism (Oxford U Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Borowitz, Eugene, Renewing the Covenant; A Theology for the Postmodern Jew 5 (Jewish Publication Society, 1991)Google Scholar.

25. Religion of Reason (Frederick Ungar, 1972)Google Scholar.

26. The Essence of Judaism (Schocken Books, 1961)Google Scholar.

27. Kaplan, Mordecai M., Judaism as a Civilization (Schocken Books, 1967)Google Scholar.

28. Borowitz, , Renewing the Covenant at 11 (cited in note 24)Google Scholar.

29. Id at 17.

30. Epstein, Isidore, The Faith of Judaism, An Interpretation for Our Times (Hollen Street Press, 1954)Google Scholar.

31. Barth, Aron, The Modern Jew Faces Eternal Problems (Religious Section of the Youth and Hechalutz Department of the Zionist Organization, 1956)Google Scholar.

32. The Lonely Man of Faith 7(2) Tradition 9 (1965)Google Scholar; compare my Torah min haShamayim uMadda haMiqra haModerni, 133 Beit Mikra 105 (1993)Google Scholar. We would also have liked to know Rabbi Soloveitchik's reaction to the insights of evolution theory, psycho-analysis, anthropology and sociology.

33. Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 191–93 (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

34. See Lamm, Norman, Faith and Doubt; Studies in Jewish Thought (Ktav, 1972)Google Scholar; Golding, Joshua L., Faith and Doubt Reconsidered 26(3) Tradition 33 (1992)Google Scholar.

35. Tanchuma Num 27:16; Edeles, R. Samuel, Chiddushey Maharsha, Berakhot 58aGoogle Scholar. The text of the blessing was: “Blessed be you Lord, our God, King of the Universe, whose Wisdom includes all Secrets (of the Torah).” The idea was that all secret meanings of the text, as discovered by conflicting interpreters, were, actually, derived from God.

36. JT Sanhedrin 4:1-2, 22 ab; BT ‘Eruvin 13b; Sanhedrin 17ab; BT Chagigah 3b. See also sections 8.3 and 8.4 of the text.

37. Sifra Bechuqotai 13:7; BT Temurah 16a.

38. Compare R. Samuel Edeles, Chiddushey Maharsha, Yevamot, end; and Encyclopaedia Talmudit, s.v. darkhey no'am, darkhey shalom.

39. Compare Encyclopaedia Talmudit, s.v. hora'at sha‘ah.

40. An example is the decision made by R. Solomon Auerbach of Jerusalem, nullifying the betrothal of a minor daughter by her father, as reported in Goldberg, Carey, Orthodox Judges Overturn Betrothal of a Minor, New York Times B3 (07 11, 1995)Google Scholar.

41. Cohen, Shaye J.D., From the Maccabees to the Mishnah 45 (Westminster Press, 1987)Google Scholar. Compare my Law and Religion; The Jewish Experience 43–57 (Mesharim, 1981)Google Scholar.

42. Deut 6:4–9; 11:13-21Google Scholar.

43. M Berakhot 2:2.

44. This is the meaning of the recital of Num 15:37–41Google Scholar.

45. Popper, Karl R., The Open Society and its Enemies (Princeton U Press, 1950)Google Scholar; Popper, Karl R., The Poverty of Historicism (Basic Books, Inc., 1957)Google Scholar.

46. Levinas, Emmanuel, Totality and Infinity (Duquesne U Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Hand, Compare Sean, ed, The Levinas Reader (B. Blackwell, 1989)Google Scholar; Handelman, Susan A., Fragments of Redemption; Jewish Thought and Literary Theory in Benjamin, Scholem and Levinas (Indiana U Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

47. Heschel, Abraham Joshua, God in Search of Man 36 (Jewish Publication Society, 1959)Google Scholar.

48. Fackenheim, Emil L., The Jewish Return into History; Reflections in the Age of Auschwitz and a new Jerusalem 48 (Schocken, 1978)Google Scholar.

49. Fackenheim, Emil L., Quest for Past and Future; Essays in Jewish Theology 6 (Indiana U Press, 1968)Google Scholar.

50. Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 15, 273 (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

51. Robinson, John A. T., Honest to God (Westminster, 1963)Google Scholar; Robinson, John A. T., But that I can't Believe (New American Library, Inc, 1967)Google Scholar.

52. Buren, Paul M. Van, The Secular Meaning of the Gospels (Macmillan, 1963)Google Scholar.

53. Cox, Harvey, The Secular City (Macmillan, 1978)Google Scholar.

54. Rubenstein, Richard L., After Auschwitz; Radical Theology and Contemporary Judaism (Macmillan, 1966)Google Scholar.

55. Kushner, Harold S., When Bad Things Happen to Good People (Schocken, 1981)Google Scholar.

56. On the history of legal postmodernism see Kelman, Mark, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Harvard U Press, 1987)Google Scholar; Tushnett, Mark, Critical Legal Studies; A Political History, 100 Yale L J 1515 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. As to critiques of postmodernism, Fiss, Owen, The Death of the Law?, 72 Cornell L Rev 1, 9–10 (1987)Google Scholar (Critical Legal Studies Movement propounds the thesis that “law is politics”); Edwards, Harry T., The Growing Disjunction between Legal Education and the Legal Profession, 91 Michigan L Rev 34 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57. Gordon, Robert W., Critical Legal Histories, 36 Stan L Rev 57 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58. Tushnett, , Critical Legal Studies at 1528 (cited in note 56)Google Scholar emphasizes the implications of postmodernism as a critique of all totalizing theories and as support of pluralism. Both ideas suit the political practice of Critical Legal Studies.

59. Horwitz, Morton J., Foreword: The Constitution of Change: Legal Fundamentality Without Fundamentalism, 107 Harv L Rev 32 (1993)Google Scholar describes the following techniques.

60. Balkin, J.M., Deconstructive Practice and Legal Theory, 96 Yale L J 743, 767–72 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61. Luban, David, Legal Modernism, 84 Mich L Rev 1656 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62. von Ihering, Rudolph, Der Zweck im Recht (Law as a Means to an End) (The Boston Book Co, trans Hussik, , 1924)Google Scholar; Cohen, Felix S., Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach, 35 Colum L Rev 809 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63. Cotterrell, Roger, The Politics of Jurisprudence; A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy 211 (Butterworths, 1989)Google Scholar.

64. Oliver, Martyn, Towards a Liberal Utopia, Times Literary Supplement 14 (06 24, 1994)Google Scholar; Lingis, Alphonso, Some questions about Lyotard's Postmodern Legitimation Narrative, 20 Philosophy and Social Criticism 1 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, criticizing Lyotard, Jean-Francois, The Postmodern Condition; A Report on Knowledge (U Minnesota Press, Bennington, G. & Massumi, B. trans, 1984)Google Scholar.

65. M. Horwitz, The Constitution of Change (cited in note 59).

66. Cover, Robert M., Foreword to “The Supreme Court 1982 Term: Nomos and Narrative,” 97 Harv L Rev 4 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Cover's characteristics of Jewish law are: 1. Anarchy, no doctrine of precedent nor hierarchy, myth of “legitimacy for diffuse systems of authority;” both Hillel's and Shammai's are the words of God (BT ‘Eruvin 13 b). 2. System of reciprocal obligations, interpersonal commitments, rather than of rights; hence no violence. 3. Means of moral and social transformation; law's teleology. The purpose of the law (Maimonides, Epistle to Yemen; Maimonides, , Guide of the Perplexed 2:39–40Google Scholar; Goodman, Lenn, Justice at 100 (Yale U Press, 1991)Google Scholar).

The decentralized and pluralist character of Jewish law has also been analysed by Kraemer, David, The Mind of the Talmud 102, 139 (Oxford U Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Menachem, Hanina Ben, Is There Always One Uniquely Correct Answer to a Legal Question in the Talmud?, 6 Jewish L Annual 164, 166 (1987)Google Scholar; Ben-Menahem, Harina, Judicial Deviation in Talmudic Law 86 (Harwood Academic Pub, 1991)Google Scholar. On the limits of pluralism, Halivni, David, Peshat and Derash 121 (1991)Google Scholar.

67. Stone, Suzanne Last, In Pursuit of the Counter Text: The Turn to the Jewish Legal Model in Contemporary American Legal Theory, 106 Harv L Rev 813 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68. Berger, , The Sacred Canopy at 166 (cited in note 2)Google Scholar.

69. Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 103 (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

70. Borowitz, , Renewing the Covenant at 1–52 (cited in note 24)Google Scholar.

71. Id at 237-99.

72. For example, Bleich, J. David, Judaism and Natural Law, 1 Jewish L Annual 5 (1988)Google Scholar; Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 157-67, 273 (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

73. Borowitz, , Renewing the Covenant at 27 (cited in note 24)Google Scholar.

74. Qiyyum beSod haTsimtsum (Byalik, 1990)Google Scholar; Dia-Logo Therapy; Psychonarration and PaRDes (Praeger, 1991)Google Scholar; Shiv'im Panim laChayim (Bialik, 1994)Google Scholar.

75. Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 54 and following (cited in note 1)Google Scholar, contra Leibowitz, Yeshayahu, Yahadut, Am Israel uMedinat Israel (Schocken, 1982)Google Scholar; Rubenstein, After Auschwitz (cited in note 54).

76. Genesis Rabba 39:1.

77. Wisdom, John, “Cods” in 45 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 185 (Harrison & Sons, 1944–1945)Google Scholar; Hick, John, Philosophy of Religion 101 (Prentice Hall, 4th ed, 1990)Google Scholar; Dorff, Elliot N., Knowing God 2 (Jason Aronson, 1992)Google Scholar.

78. Hilgard, Compare Ernest R., Richard, C. & Atkinson, Rita L., Introduction to Psychology 135 (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 6th ed, 1975)Google Scholar.

79. Dorff, , Knowing God at 33 (cited in note 77)Google Scholar.

80. Id at 35.

81. The experience of one God against a polytheistic background, as distinct from monotheism.

82. Compare my “From East to West My Name Is Lauded Among the Nations” in Hick, John & Askari, Hasan, eds, The Experience of Religious Diversity 25 (Gower, 1985)Google Scholar.

83. Ga'on, Sa‘adyah, Book of Doctrines and Beliefs 2:11 in Three Jewish Philosophers (cited in note 14)Google Scholar.

84. Kook, R. Abraham Isaac Hakohen, ‘Oroth 130–31 (Jerusalem, 7th ed, 1982)Google Scholar.

85. Compare my Religious Law and Ethics at 116, contra Sacks, , Crisis and Covenant at 158 and following (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

86. JT Chagigah 1:7, 76c.

87. Greenberg, Irving Yitz, Voluntary Covenant (Nat'l Jewish Resource Center, 1982)Google Scholar.

88. In his earlier thought around the establishment of the state: Yahadut, ‘Am Israel uMedinat Israel (Schocken, 1975)Google Scholar.

89. Especially in Not in Heaven; The Nature and Function of Halakhah (Ktav, 1983)Google Scholar.

90. Faur, Jose, Golden Doves with Silver Dots (Indiana U Press, 1986)Google Scholar.

91. Sacks, Compare, Crisis and Covenant at 208 and following (cited in note 1)Google Scholar.

92. Compare Stone, The Jewish Legal Model (cited in note 67) and Stone, Suzanne Last, Judaism and Postmodernism, 14 Cardozo L Rev 1681 (1993)Google Scholar.

93. Borowitz, , Renewing the Covenant at 252 (cited in note 24)Google Scholar.

94. Gordis, Robert, A Dynamic Halakhah, 28 Judaism 263 (1979)Google Scholar.

95. Jacobs, , A Tree of Life at 263 and following (cited in note 20)Google Scholar.

96. Borowitz, , Renewing the Covenant at 282 (cited in note 24)Google Scholar.

97. Braude, William G. and Kapstein, Isaac J., eds, Pesiqta deR. Kahana, Bachodesh 182 (Jewish Pub Society of America, 1975)Google Scholar.

98. BT ‘Eruvin 13b.

99. M Yevamot 1:4; BT Yevamot 1:11; compare Rosensweig, Michael, Elu Va-Elu; Halakhic Pluralism and Theories of Controversy, 26(3) Tradition 4 (1992)Google Scholar.

100. See for instance Rakover, Nahum, The Multi-Language Bibliography of Jewish Law 473 (The Jewish Legal Heritage Society, 1990)Google Scholar.

101. Compare Encyclopaedia Talmudit, s.v. darkhey no'am, darkhey shalom.

102. Compare Encyclopaedia Talmudit, s.v. ga'awah.

103. JT Sanhedrin 1:6; 19c; BT Sanhedrin 88b.

104. Jer 31:35-36.

105. Book of Doctrines and Beliefs, 3:6 in Three Jewish Philosophers at 111 (cited in note 14)Google Scholar.