Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T21:49:13.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behind the Veil: Women's Rights in Islamic Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Nayer Honarvar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is a study of women's rights in Islamic societies, a relatively insignificant subject to the people who live in those societies. The Muslim population of the world is in excess of one billion and approximately one-half of this number, or five hundred million, are female. Geographically, Islam is practiced in all of Arabia, most parts of the Middle East, India, Pakistan, Africa, parts of Spain, and Portugal.

Based on the available literature one may conclude that the Muslims are not particularly interested in this topic. The information that is available is relatively one-sided, expressing the male point of view and his perception of what women's rights ought to be. One reason for this lack of interest is that women, the principal characters, generally lack the formal education necessary for the understanding of their own rights and privileges. Throughout history, there have been very few people willing to advocate this cause. As stated by Dr. Fyzee, a Muslim scholar, the unfortunate position of the women is due to the fact that women, being illiterate, are ignorant of their rights; and men, being callous, choose to remain ignorant.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , 1988 , pp. 355 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fyzer, A., Outlines of Mohammedan Law (1964)Google Scholar.

2. Lyall, C., Translation of Ancient Arabian Poetry xxxi (1930)Google Scholar.

3. Gibbs, H., Mohammedanism 33 (1962)Google Scholar.

4. Levy, R., The Social Structure of Islam 53–54 (1957)Google Scholar.

5. Dickson, H., The Arab of the Desert (1949)Google Scholar.

6. Fox, R., Kinship and Marriage 31 (1967)Google Scholar.

7. Id. at 39-40.

8. Nicholson, R.A., A Literary History of the Arabs 38 (1969)Google Scholar.

9. Fox, supra note 6, at 41-42.

10. Id. at 46-47.

11. Fyzee, supra note 1, at 11.

12. Encyclopedia of Islam, ii.258; Camb. Med. Hist, ii, 306 (defining ‘Hanifs’).

13. Schacht, J., Origins of Mohammedan Jurisprudence (1950)Google Scholar.

14. See supra note 12, at iv 322 (defining ‘Shari’at).

15. Holy Qur'an, LXVil, 1,2Google Scholar.

16. Siddiqui, M., Women in Islam 23–24 (1952)Google Scholar.

17. Purdavud, I., Zan dar Iran Boston (Women in Ancient Iran) 355–60 (1944)Google Scholar.

18. Id. at 358.

19. Watt, W., Mohammed at Mecca 21 (1953)Google Scholar.

20. Waddy, C., Women in Muslim History 30–31 (1980)Google Scholar.

21. Smith, W., Kinship and Marriage in Early Arabia 85 (1903)Google Scholar.

22. 8 All. 149 (1886).

23. Id.

24. 201 Polygamous Unions Before the English Courts, The Law Times 248-49 (1946).

25. Fyzee, supra note 1, at 102.

26. Tyabji, F., Muhammedan Law, section 28 (1940)Google Scholar.

27. Id. at section 24, which I have adopted with slight modification.

28. Id. at section 118.

29. See supra note 12, at iii 636-40.

30. Wilson, R., Anglo-Muhammadan Law 61 (1930)Google Scholar.

31. Fyzee, supra note 1, at 151-52.

32. Siddiqui, supra notes 16, at 77-79.

33. A.I.R. Peshawar 7 (1949).

34. Muhammad Ibrahim v. Altafan, 47 All. 243 (1925).

35. Abdul-Rauf, M., The Islamic View of Women and the Family 95–97 (1977)Google Scholar.

36. Id.

37. Tyabji, supra note 25, at 823.

38. Id. at 601.

39. Id. at 602-03, 822.

40. Syed, Amir Ali, Mohammadan Law (1929)Google Scholar.

41. Fardunji, M., Principles of Muhammadan Law (1961)Google Scholar.

42. Siddiqu, supra note 16, at 177-78.