Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T22:01:29.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEW DIRECTIONS IN NATURAL LAW

Review products

Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. By AnverEmon, MatthewLevering, and DavidNovak. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Pp. 256. $83.00 (cloth). ISBN: 978-0198706601.
Searching for a Universal Ethic: Multidisciplinary, Ecumenical, and Interfaith Responses to the Catholic Natural Law Tradition. Edited by JohnBerkman and William C.MattisonIII. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2014. Pp. 339. $35.00 (paper). ISBN: 978-0802868442.
Divine Covenants and Moral Order: A Biblical Theology of Natural Law. By DavidVanDrunen. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2014. Pp. 594. $45.00 (paper). ISBN: 978-0802870940.

Show more reviewed productsShow more reviewed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Vincent Lloyd
Vincent Lloyd*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Theology and Religious Studies, Villanova University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Notoriously, natural law means many things to many people. Natural law is discussed quite differently in the fields of ethics, law, and theology; it is employed quite differently in the spheres of political rhetoric, churches, and academia; it has been used quite differently in the eras of ancient Rome, medieval Europe, the Enlightenment, and the postmodern West; and something akin to natural law appears, with quite different associations, in the religious traditions of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism. In some contexts natural law refers to God's moral law. In other contexts natural law consists of norms that can be discerned solely through human reason. In still other contexts natural law describes rules that are naturally embedded in the physical world.

Keywords

reasonemotionGod's lawhuman nature
Type
STATE OF THE FIELD ESSAYS
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 367 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I am ignoring the second-order normativity involved in the claim that one ought to obey the law, in the traffic-light case.

2 Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar; Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)Google Scholar.

3 John Finnis taught at Oxford from 1966 to 2010; he remains an honorary fellow at University College, Oxford. From 1995, Finnis has also held a faculty appointment at the University of Notre Dame.

4 George has served on the United States Commission on Civil Rights, the President's Council on Bioethics, the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, and as a Judicial Fellow of the Supreme Court of the United States, among other positions.

5 Also closely aligned with the position of Finnis and George is the work of Catholic theologian Germain Grisez. For Grisez's comprehensive statement on moral theology, see his The Way of the Lord Jesus, 3 vols. (Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1983–1987).

6 Finnis, John, Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar.

7 Hart, H. L. A. addresses these issues directly in his early essays “Are There Any Natural Rights,” Philosophical Review 64, no. 2 (1955), 175–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71, no. 4 (1958), 593–629 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Among the notable works developing legal positivism in Hart's wake are Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1979)Google Scholar; Gardner, John, “Legal Positivism: 5 ½ Myths,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 46, no. 1 (2001): 199–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, Marmor, Andrei, Positive Law and Objective Values (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Leiter, Brian, Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Green, Leslie, “Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals,” New York University Law Review 83, no. 4 (2008): 1035–58Google Scholar.

8 There have been critiques of Finnis's position from the law school world, ranging from Weinreb, Lloyd, Natural Law and Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987)Google Scholar, to Bamforth, Nicholas and Richard, David A. J., Patriarchal Religion, Sexuality, and Gender: A Critique of New Natural Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar; see also the work of philosopher Hittinger, Russell, especially A Critique of the New Natural Law Theory (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987)Google Scholar.

9 Murphy, Mark, Natural Law and Practical Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar; Murphy, Mark, Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Murphy, Mark, God and Moral Law: On the Theistic Explanation of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 For example, George and George Duke co-edited the forthcoming Cambridge Companion to Natural Law Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

11 For a historical account of natural law in the context of Catholic moral theology over the past century, see Keenan, James F., A History of Catholic Moral Theology in the Twentieth Century: From Confessing Sins to Liberating Consciences (London: Continuum, 2010)Google Scholar.

12 For reflections on this general problem of interpretation and authority, see Jordan, Mark D., Rewritten Theology: Aquinas after His Readers (Malden: Blackwell, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a spectrum of responses to Finnis's and George's work from theologians and Christian philosophers, see Biggar, Nigel, ed., The Revival of Natural Law (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000)Google Scholar.

13 Bowlin, John, Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas's Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

14 Hall, Pamela, Narrative and the Natural Law: An Interpretation of Thomistic Ethics (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

15 Porter, Jean, Nature as Reason: A Thomistic Theory of Natural Law (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2005)Google Scholar.

16 Traina, Cristina, Feminist Ethics and Natural Law: The End of the Anathemas (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

17 Tuck, Richard, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tierney, Brian, The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural Law, and Church Law, 1150–1625 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997)Google Scholar; Oakley, Francis, Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas (New York: Continuum, 2005)Google Scholar.

18 Of course another way to challenge the foundations, in addition to contesting Aquinas' interpretation, is to turn to the Bible itself. See Levering, Matthew, Biblical Natural Law: A Theocentric and Teleological Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Novak, David, Natural Law in Judaism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

20 For example, Menski, Werner F., Hindu Law: Beyond Tradition and Modernity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 See the Emory University Studies in Law and Religion book series, especially VanDrunen, David, Natural Law and the Two Kingdoms: A Study in the Development of Reformed Social Thought (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2010)Google Scholar; Witte, John, The Reformation of Rights: Law, Religion, and Human Rights in Early Modern Calvinism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Neil Daniel Arner, “Theological Voluntarism and the Natural Law: The Integrated Moral Theories of John Duns Scotus, John Calvin, and Samuel Pufendorf” (PhD diss., Yale University, 2012).

22 Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights and History (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; Moyn, Samuel, Christian Human Rights (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015)Google Scholar.

23 Smith, Caleb, The Oracle and the Curse: A Poetics of Justice from the Revolution to the Civil War (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Ted, Weird John Brown: Divine Violence and the Limits of Ethics (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar.

24 For George's expansive view, see George, Robert P., The Clash of Orthodoxies: Law, Religion, and Morality in Crisis (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2001)Google Scholar. Strauss's view is advanced in Natural Right and History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953)Google ScholarPubMed and applied to the American context by Zuckert, Michael P. in The Natural Rights Republic: Studies in the Foundation of the American Political Tradition (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996)Google Scholar. The most recent and comprehensive development of the Straussian position on these issues is Seagrave, S. Adam, The Foundations of Natural Morality: On the Compatibility of Natural Rights and the Natural Law (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 “[A]ction, which is rooted in the body, is always already oriented to the meaning that is inscribed in human nature by the Creator. It finds its beginning in passion, which is precisely that reaction which reveals to man the possibility of a new and greater fullness that freedom is called on to acknowledge and embrace in the light of reason” (Melina, Searching for a Universal Ethic, 299).

26 Most notably, Anver Emon argues that the International Theological Commission is particularly careless in its treatment of Islam because it points to the Mu‛tazilite theological school to demonstrate the Islamic interest in natural law, but the Mu‛tazilite school is now generally considered heterodox (Emon, Searching for a Universal Ethic, 128–29).

27 For an intellectual-historical rather than constructive engagement between these three traditions, see Brague, Rémi, The Law of God: The Philosophical History of an Idea (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007)Google Scholar; originally published in French in 2005. Reference to Brague's compelling work is nearly absent from Natural Law; this absence is another reminder of the insularity of Anglophone natural law debates.

28 Novak, Jewish Natural Law; Emon, Anver, Islamic Natural Law Theories (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Emon, Anver, ed., Islamic and Jewish Legal Reasoning: Encountering Our Legal Other (London: Oneworld Publications, 2016)Google Scholar.

29 But see Finnis, Natural Law and Natural Rights, chapter 13, for an argument for the necessary role of God in such a natural law theory.

30 See especially the development of “reasons fundamentalism” in Scanlon, T. M., Being Realistic about Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Parfit, Derek, On What Matters (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

31 Finnis, John, “Prudence about Ends,” in Reason in Action: Collected Essays, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 173–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In general, Finnis is much more open than is George to appreciating the role of the virtues and to resisting reasons fundamentalism.

32 See, for example, Nussbaum, Martha, Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013)Google Scholar; Hordern, Joshua, Political Affections: Civic Participation and Moral Theology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar; Frazer, Michael L., The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 It is essential to the biblical story that God is angry, jealous, suffering, and loving, to take but four examples.

34 Though note how VanDrunen sees the Christian church as a site where a higher, pre-eschatological moral order is enacted.

35 Feuerbach, Ludwig, The Essence of Christianity (New York: Harper, 1957)Google Scholar.

36 Turner, Denys, “Marxism, Liberation Theology, and the Way of Negation,” in The Cambridge Companion to Liberation Theology, ed. Rowland, Christopher (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 229–47Google Scholar.

37 Geuss, Raymond, Philosophy and Real Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 This is an unusual case because of the role of the Supreme Court Justice as part-judge, part-intellectual; it is likely untrue for lower court judges. Clarence Thomas wrote about natural law theory before he joined the court, causing a controversy at his confirmation hearings. See, for example, Thomas, “The Higher Law Background of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 12, no. 1 (1989), 63–70 Google Scholar.

39 Kaveny, Cathleen, Prophecy without Contempt: Religious Discourse in the Public Square (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shulman, George, American Prophecy: Race and Redemption in American Political Culture (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

40 Lloyd, Vincent W., Black Natural Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.