Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-r8w4l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T12:04:47.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Binders Full of Judges: A Model of the Interdependency of Appointments to the United States Federal Judiciary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2022

Alicia Uribe-McGuire
Alicia Uribe-McGuire*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I create a simulation model that predicts the portfolio of judges the president chooses to fill vacancies in the judiciary. I find that the president’s strategy in terms of appointments depends on constraint from the Senate, the talent pool of possible judges to appoint, the ideology of the courts in the judiciary, and the number of vacancies to be filled. The model is successful in replicating results that have been found in previous research, while also generating new hypotheses about previously unexplored aspects of the appointment process.

Keywords

Judicial BranchAppointmentsJudicial AppointmentsComputational Modeling
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Law and Courts , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , October 2023 , pp. 329 - 349
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Law and Courts Organized Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrow, Deborah J., and Zuk, Gary. 1990. “An institutional analysis of turnover in the lower federal courts, 1900-1987.” The Journal of Politics 52 (2): 457–76.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2002. “Senatorial delay in confirming federal judges, 1947-1998.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 190–9.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2009. Advice & Dissent: The Struggle to Shape the Federal Judiciary. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Spill, Rorie L.. 2003. “Moving up the Judicial Ladder.” American Politics Research 31 (2): 198–218.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Kastellec, John, and Mattioli, Lauren. 2019. “Presidential Selection of supreme court nominees: the characteristics approach.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 14 (4): 439–74.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Landes, William M., and Posner, Richard A.. 2013. The Behavior of Federal Judges. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Lindstadt, Rene, Segal, Jeffrey A., and Westerland, Chad. 2006. “The changing dynamics of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominees.” The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 296–307.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 2005. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gale, David, and Shapley, Lloyd S.. 1962. “College admissions and the stability of marriage.” The American Mathematical Monthly 69 (1): 9–15.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., Hettinger, Virginia A., and Peppers, Todd. 2001. “Picking federal judges: A note on policy and partisan selection agendas.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (3): 623–41.Google Scholar
Goldman, Sheldon. 1999. Picking Federal Judges: Lower Court Selection from Roosevelt through Reagan. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Barbara L. 2004. “Toward an understanding of judicial diversity in American courts.” Michigan Journal of Race and Law 10 (1): 153–94Google Scholar
Hansford, Thomas G., Savchak, Elisha Carol, and Songer, Donald R.. 2010. “Politics, careerism, and the voluntary departures of U.S. District Court Judges.” American Politics Research 38 (6): 986–1014.Google Scholar
Hettinger, Virginia A., and Zorn, Christopher. 2005. “Explaining the incidence and timing of congressional responses to the US Supreme Court.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 5–28.Google Scholar
Johnson, Carrie. 2020. “Wave of young judges pushed by McConnell will be ‘ruling for decades to come’.” National Public Radio, July 2, 2020, sec. law. https://www.npr.org/2020/07/02/886285772/trump-and-mcconnell-via-swath-of-judges-will-affect-u-s-law-for-decadesGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kevin R., and Fuentes-Rohwer, Luis. 2004. “A principled approach to the quest for racial diversity on the judiciary.” Michigan Journal of Race and Law 10 (5): 5–53.Google Scholar
König, D. 1931. “Graphs and matrices.” Mat. Fiz. Lapok 38: 116–9.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2007. “Supreme Court appointments as a move-the-median game.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 231–40.Google Scholar
Manning, Kenneth L., Carp, Robert A., and Holmes, Lisa A.. 2022. Judicial Process in America. 12th Edition. Washington: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Martinek, Wendy L., Kemper, Mark, and Van Winkle, Steven R.. 2002. “To advise and consent: The Senate and lower federal court nominations, 1977–1998.” The Journal of Politics 64 (2): 337–61.Google Scholar
Massie, Tajuana D., Hansford, Thomas G., and Songer, Donald R.. 2004. “The timing of presidential nominations to the lower federal courts.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 145–54.Google Scholar
Moraski, Bryon J., and Shipan, Charles R.. 1999. “The politics of Supreme Court nominations: A theory of institutional constraints and choices.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1069–95.Google Scholar
Nemacheck, Christine L. 2008. Strategic Selection: Presidential Nomination of Supreme Court Justices from Herbert Hoover Through George W. Bush. Charlottesville VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Pentico, David W. 2007. “Assignment problems: A golden anniversary survey.” European Journal of Operational Research 176 (2): 774–93.Google Scholar
Primo, David M, Binder, Sarah A., and Maltzman, Forrest. 2008. “Who consents? Competing pivots in federal judicial selection.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 471–89.Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William, H. 2002 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary. July 15, 2002. https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/speeches/sp_07-15-02.htmlGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John G. 2010 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary. December 31, 2010. https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2010year-endreport.pdfGoogle Scholar
Roth, Alvin E., and Sotomayor, Marilda A. Oliveira. 1990. Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game Theoretic Modeling and Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Savchak, Elisha Carol, Hansford, Thomas G., Songer, Donald R., Manning, Kenneth L., and Carp, Robert A.. 2006. “Taking it to the next level: The elevation of district court judges to the US Courts of Appeals.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 478–93.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation-of-powers games in the positive theory of congress and courts.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 28–44.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Cameron, Charles M., and Cover, Albert D.. 1992. “A spatial model of roll call voting: Senators, constituents, presidents, and interest groups in Supreme Court confirmations.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1): 96–121.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Shannon, Megan L.. 2003. “Delaying justice(s): A duration analysis of Supreme Court confirmations.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 654–68.Google Scholar
Slotnick. 2003. “Federal judicial selection in the new millennium.” University of California Davis Law Review 36: 587–96.Google Scholar
Solberg, Rorie Spill. 2006. “Court size and diversity on the bench: The NINTH CIRcuit and its sisters.” Arizona Law Review 48: 247–66.Google Scholar
Spriggs, James F., and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. 1995. “Calling it quits: Strategic retirement on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 1893-1991.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (3): 573–97.Google Scholar
Votaw, D.F. Jr 1952. “Methods of solving some personnel-classification problems.” Psychometrika 17 (3): 255–66.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Uribe-McGuire supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Uribe-McGuire supplementary material(File)
File 35.7 KB