Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:07:19.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Supreme Court Decisions on Electoral Rules after Mexico's 1994 Judicial Reform: An Empowered Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2003

JODI FINKEL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1994 Mexico's ruling party granted new powers of judicial review and increased independence to the Mexican Supreme Court. Would these reforms enable the Court to overcome decades of judicial subordination? I examine all Mexican Supreme Court decisions addressing the constitutionality of electoral rules – rules that are inherently contentious because they determine the chances for obtaining power – during Zedillo's sexenio. These cases, culminating with a 1998 ruling counter to a key PRI political interest, demonstrate a fundamental change in Mexico's institutional power balance. This study also demonstrates the utility of electoral cases to evaluate Court power within and across countries.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , November 2003 , pp. 777 - 799
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to thank Barbara Geddes, Tiffany Meyers, John Moody, Julie Taylor, Scott Torrance and David Finkel for their support and inspiration.