Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
49.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
14.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
163.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
109.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
1.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
181.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
138.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
81.
1999.
Race, Place, and Medicine.
p.
273.
Rosenthal, Anton
2000.
Spectacle, Fear, and Protest.
Social Science History,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
Reis, Joao Jose
2005.
Batuque: African Drumming and Dance between Repression and Concession, Bahia, 1808-18551.
Bulletin of Latin American Research,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 2,
p.
201.
Monteiro, John M.
2005.
The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America.
p.
185.
Vidal, Laurent
2005.
Tendances récentes de la recherche sur l'histoire du Brésil urbain.
Histoire urbaine,
Vol. n° 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
Collins, Jane-Marie
2009.
‘Uteis a si e a sociedade’1 or a brief guide to creolisation in nineteenth-century Brazil: black women, mobility, marriage and markets in Salvador da Bahia (1830–1888).
European Review of History: Revue europeenne d'histoire,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 3,
p.
413.
Klandermans, Bert
and
Roggeband, Conny
2010.
Handbook of Social Movements Across Disciplines.
p.
267.
van der Linden, Marcel
2012.
The Promise and Challenges of Global Labor History.
International Labor and Working-Class History,
Vol. 82,
Issue. ,
p.
57.
Miki, Yuko
2012.
FLEEING INTO SLAVERY: The Insurgent Geographies of Brazilian Quilombolas (Maroons), 1880-1881.
The Americas,
Vol. 68,
Issue. 4,
p.
495.
van der Linden, Marcel
2014.
Workers and Labour in a Globalised Capitalism.
p.
70.
van der Linden, Marcel
2016.
O CONCEITO MARXIANO DE PROLETARIADO: UMA CRÍTICA.
Sociologia & Antropologia,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
87.
Dabat, Christine Rufino
and
Rogers, Thomas D.
2017.
Sugarcane Workers in Search of Justice: Rural Labour through the Lens of the State.
International Review of Social History,
Vol. 62,
Issue. S25,
p.
217.