Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:26:48.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Problem of Political Order in Early Republican Spanish America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Extract

The persistent instability and disorder of Spanish American polities in the post-Independence period was undoubtedly one of the most perplexing concerns of Spanish American elites in the nineteenth century. It has remained a subject of interpretive debate by twentieth-century students of the area. The following article sketches several general approaches to the problem among twentieth-century interpreters, compares contemporary nineteenth-century analyses with the salient twentieth-century interpretations, and offers a critical commentary on the various sorts of twentieth-century analytical frameworks.

The three salient twentieth-century interpretations of political disorder in the nineteenth century are: (1) those that emphasise deeply embedded characteristics of Spanish American culture as underlying causes of political instability; (2) those that attribute political disorder to structural problems, particularly to weaknesses in the economic structure or shifts in the social structure; (3) those that see political instability as a reflection of conflicting ideologies, economic interests, and/or the aspirations or fears of identifiable social groups.

The distinctive feature of cultural interpretations of Latin American politics is their common belief that cultural characteristics are indelible and more-or-less unchangeable. And, since such cultural interpretations emphasise what might be considered ‘negative’ aspects of Spanish or Spanish American culture in order to explain defects in Spanish American politics, their assumption that cultures do not change over time tends to imbue such interpretations with a certain pessimism about the future of Spanish American politics.

An early twentieth-century exponent of cultural approaches to understanding Spanish-American political disorder was Francisco García Calderón, who, thinking particularly of the phenomenon of caudillismo, emphasised Spanish authoritarian individualism.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Calderón, Francisco García, Latin America: Its Rise and Progress (New York, 1913), p. 31.Google Scholar

2 Dealy, Glen, The Public Man: An Interpretation of Latin American and Other Catholic Countries (Amherst, 1977).Google Scholar

3 Calderón, García, Latin America, pp. 6264 and 75–76ff.Google Scholar

4 Morse, Richard M., ‘Toward a Theory of Spanish American Politics’, journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 15 (1954). PP. 7193CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and ‘The Heritage of Latin America’, in Hartz, Louis, The Founding of New Societies (New York, 1964), particularly pp. 138177.Google Scholar

5 Dealy, Glen, ‘Prolegomena on the Spanish American Political Tradition’, Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 48, no. 1 (Feb. 1968), pp. 37–58Google Scholar; and ‘The Tradition of Monistic Democracy in Latin America’, in Wiarda, Howard J. (ed.), Politics and Social Change in Latin America: The Distinct Tradition (Amherst, 1974), pp. 71103.Google Scholar

6 Note his request that Morse write a preface for The Public Man.

7 For characteristic assemblages, see Wiarda, (ed.), Politics and Social Change, and Pike, Frederick B. and Stritch, Thomas (eds.), The New Corporatism: Social-Political Structures in the Iberian World (Notre Dame, 1974).Google Scholar

8 Cartagena, Bolívar, 1813, in Lecuña, Vicente and Bierck, Harold (eds.), Selected Writings of Bolívar (2 vols., New York, 1951), vol. 1, p. 21.Google Scholar

9 Monteagudo, , ‘Memoria sobre los principios políticos…” (Quito, 17 March 1823)Google Scholar, in Monteagudo, Bernardo, Horizontes políticos (Buenos Aires [1938]), pp. 205207.Google Scholar

10 Lastarria, José Victorino, La América (Gante, 1867).Google Scholar

11 Speaking of Argentina's military leaders, he says, ‘Fue su ignorancia natural y concebible de las condiciones de la libertad interior. Se pusieron a construir una máquina de que no tenían idea. Ninguno de ellos conocía practicamente la libertad interior… Se habían educado en España, bajo el despotismo más absoluto y más indisputado, y no conocían más gobierno interior, que el gobierno personal que los reyes absolutos pretendían tener de Dios mismo, y que ejercían sobre el país sin la más remota participación del país.’ (Alberdi, Juan Bautista, Obras completas [8 vols., Buenos Aires, 1886–1887], vol. VII p. 348.)Google Scholar

12 ‘La Democracia, que tanto pregonan los ilusos, es un absurdo en los paises como los americanos, llenos de vicios y donde los ciudadanos carecen de toda virtud… La Monarquía no es tampoco el ideal americano: salimos de una terrible… La República es el sistema que hay que adoptar… Un Gobierno fuerte, centralizador, cuyos hombres sean verdaderos modelos de virtud… y así enderezar a los ciudadanos por el camino del orden y de las virtudes. Cuando se hayan moralizado, venga el Gobierno completamente liberal, libre y lleno de virtudes, donde tengan parte todos los ciudadanos.’ (Portales to J. M. Cea, Lima, March, 1822, in Castro, Raúl Silva (ed.), Ideas y confesiones de Portales (Santiago de Chile, 1954), p. 15.Google Scholar

13 Arboleda, , La república en la América Española (Bogotá, 1972), p. 83.Google Scholar

14 Bazant, , Historia de la deuda exterior de México (1823–1946) (México, 1968)Google Scholar; Tenenbaum, Barbara A., The Politics of Penury: Debts and Taxes in Mexico, 1821–1856 (Albuquerque, 1986)Google Scholar, Deas, Malcolm, ‘The Fiscal Problems Of Nineteenth-Century Colombia’, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 14, no. 2 (1982), pp. 287328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Stevens, Donald F., Origins of Instability in Early Republican Mexico (Durham, 1991)Google Scholar, ch. 2.

16 Donghi, Tulio Halperín, The Aftermath of Revolution in Latin America (New York, 1973).Google Scholar

17 Costeloe, Michael P.describesthe relative decline of the Church in Church Wealth in Mexico: A Study of the ‘Juzgado de Capellanías’ in the Archbishopric of Mexico, 1800–1856 (Cambridge, 1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and its continuing influence in various articles (e.g. ‘The Mexican Church and the Rebellion of the Polkos’, Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 46, no. 2 [May, 1966], pp. 170188.).Google Scholar

18 Maingot, Anthony P., ‘Social Structure, Social Status, and Civil-Military Conflict in Urban Colombia, 1810–1858’, in Thernstrom, Stephan and Sennett, Richard (eds.), Nineteenth-Century Cities: Essays in the New Urban History (New Haven, 1969), pp. 297355.Google Scholar

19 Wolf, Eric R. and Hansen, Edward C.Caudillo Politics: A Structural Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 9 (1967), pp. 168179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

20 Ibid., p. 170.

21 E.g. McBride, George M., The Land Systems of Mexico (New York, 1923).Google Scholar

22 Wolf, Eric R. and Mintz, Sidney W., ‘Haciendas and Plantations in Middle America and the Antilles’, Social and Economic Studies, vol. 6, no. 3 (1957), pp. 386387.Google Scholar

23 Wolf, and Hansen, , ‘Caudillo Politics’, p. 178.Google Scholar

24 Arboleda, , La república en América Española, p. 111.Google Scholar

25 Alberdi, , Obras completas, vol. 4, pp. 500503; v, pp. 392–419 and 487–489; VI, pp. 152 and 156–157.Google ScholarAlvarez, Juan, Estudio sobre las guerras civiles argentinas (Buenos Aires, 1938)Google Scholar [first published 1914] Oddone, Jacinto, El factor económico en nuestras luchas civiles (Buenos Aires, 1968)Google Scholar [first published 1937]; Burgin, Miron, Economic Aspects of Argentine Federalism, 1820–1852 (Cambridge, Mass., 1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 Mariano Ospina Rodríguez to José Eusebio Caro, Medellín, 22 June 1852, in Caro, José Eusebio, Epistolario (Bogotá, 1953), p. 350.Google Scholar

27 La Columna de la Constitución Federal de la Repúblics Mexicana, 2 July 1832Google Scholar, as summarised in Costeloe, Michael P., La primera república federal de México (1824–1835) (México, 1975), p. 341.Google Scholar

28 Sierra, Justo, The Political Evolution of the Mexican People (Austin, 1969), pp. 203204.Google Scholar

29 E.g. Bailey, Helen Miller and Nasatir, Abraham P., Latin America: The Development of its Civilization (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1960), p. 335Google Scholar; Bannon, John Francis, Miller, Robert Ryal, Dunne, Peter Masten, Latin America (Encino, CA, 1977), pp. 311313Google Scholar; Stanley, J. and Stein, Barbara H., The Colonial Heritage of Latin America (New York, 1970), p. 140Google Scholar; Johnson, John J., Political Change in Latin America (Stanford, 1958), pp. 15, 20 and 24.Google Scholar

30 Safford, Frank, ‘Bases of Political Alignment in Early Republican Spanish America’, in Graham, Richard and Smith, Peter H. (eds.), New Approaches to Latin Americas History (Austin, 1974), pp. 8788.Google Scholar

31 de Hincapié, María Teresa Uribe and Alvarez, Jesús María, Poderes y regiones: problemas en la constitución de la nación colombiana, 1810–1850 (Medellín, 1987)Google Scholar; Gootenberg, Paul, Between Silver and Guano: Commercial Policy and the State in Postindependence Peru (Princeton, 1989).Google Scholar

32 This is particularly emphasised in the interpretation of Park, James William, Rafael Núñnez and the Politics of Colombian Regionalism, 1863–1886 (Baton Rouge, 1985), pp. 6667, 92–97 and 156–157.Google Scholar The divisive effects of the Ferrocarril del Norte are also noted, but given less emphasis, in Delpar, Helen, Red against Blue: The Liberal Party in Colombian Politics, 1863–1899 (University of Alabama, 1981), pp. 112114 and 190.Google Scholar