Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T00:56:26.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mexican Hacienda between the Insurgency and the Revolution: Maize Production and Commercial Triumph on the Temporal*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Simon Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Andrés Molina Enríquez wrote his polemical attack on the Mexican hacienda, published on the eve of the Revolution, he was particularly scathing about the cereal estates of the mesa central. According to his arguments, these were the properties most typically ‘feudal’, and thus he characterized them as vast tracts of land, under-used and undercapitalized, serving only to legitimize the seigneurial status of an elite class of rentier landowners. The proprietors were similarly castigated for preferring the low-risk security of irrigated crops, and for their withdrawal from the uncertainties of maize production on the temporal lands. As a result of these policies the routine supply of maize, the food grain of the nation, was, or so he argued, left to the efforts and tenacity of a multitude of smallholders and Indian villagers with access to a mere tenth of the cultivable of smallholders and Indian villagers with access to a mere tenth of the cultivable terrain.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , November 1984 , pp. 309 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Andrés, Molina Enríquez, Los Grandes Problemas Nacionales (Mexico, 1978 edition), pp. 151–80. Hacienda of San Nicolás del Moral, Chalco, in the state of Mexico – Sala Francisco Xavier Alegre, Universidad Iberoamericana in Mexico City; Lic. Cristina Torales Pacheco, Lic. Maria Eugenia Ponce Alcocer and Lic. Ricardo Rendón (hereafter referred to as ASNM). Hacienda of San Juanico y anexas, Querétaro: Sr Julio and Ignacio Villasante, Sr Ignacio Cevallos and Sr Alejandro Soto (ASJ). Hacienda of Juriquilla, Queretaro: Sra Javiera de la Llata de Estrella (AJ). Haciendas of San José el Alto, Querétaro, and of Agua Azul, Apaseo el Alto, Guanajuato: Sr Gustavo Cabello (ASJA and AAA respectively). Notarial Archives, Queretaro: Sra Marta Careño (ANQ).Google Scholar

2 Enrique, Florescano, Estructuras y Problemas Agrarios de México 1500–1821 (Mexico, 1971), 125–46.Google Scholar

3 David, A. Brading, Haciendas and Ranchos in the Mexican Bajío (Cambridge, 1978), pp. 61–114.Google Scholar

4 Eric, Van Young, Hacienda and Market in Eighteenth-Century Mexico (California, 1981),Google ScholarClaude, Morin, Michoacán en la Nueva España del Siglo XVIII (Mexico),Google Scholar and John, Tutino ‘Life and Labour on North Mexican Haciendas: the Querétaro–San Luis Potosí Region, 1775–1810’ in El Trabajo y los Trabajadores en la Historia de México (Elsa, Cecilia Frost, Michael, C. Meyer, and Josefina, Zoraida Váquez, Mexico and Arizona, 1979).Google Scholar

5 John, Tutino, ‘Hacienda Social Relations in Mexico: the Chalco Region in the Era of Independence’, HAHR, 55 (1975), 527.Google Scholar

6 Brading, , Haciendas…, p. 113.Google Scholar

7 Alexander, von Humboldt, Ensayo Político sobre el Reino de la Nueva España (Mexico, 1966 edition), pp. 230–8.Google Scholar

8 José, Antonio del Raso, Notas Estadísticas del Departamento de Querétaro (Mexico, 1848), p 34–115.Google Scholar

9 Calculation based on del Raso's statistics, One fanega of maize was roughly equivalent to 91 litres or 65 kilos.

10 Brading, op. cit., p. 37, and ASJ, Cartas, 1859, p. 299.Google Scholar

11 It should be noted here that the practice of paying tithes, or Diezmos, was by this time in decline.

12 Brading, op. cit., pp. 198–9, and Tutino, ‘Life and Labour…’ loc. cit., pp. 376–7.

13 Cristobal, Kay, ‘Comparative Development of the European Manorial System and the Latin American Hacienda System’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 2 (1974), 69–98,Google ScholarTheda, Skocpol, States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge, 1979), pp. 47–157;Google ScholarBarrington, Moore Jnr, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Penguin edition, 1969), p. 40–100, 459–483,Google Scholar and Jerome, Blum, The End of the Old Order in Rural Europe (Princeton, 1978), pp. 332–53.Google Scholar

14 Jan, Bazant, ‘Landlord, Labourer, and Tenant in San Luis Potosí, northern Mexico, 1822–1910’, in Land and Labour in Latin America (eds. Kenneth, Duncan and Ian, Rutledge, Cambridge, 1977), pp. 70–5.Google Scholar

15 Herman, W. Konrad, A Jesuit Hacienda in Colonial Mexico (Stanford, 1980), p. 80.Google Scholar

16 Brading, , Haciendas…, pp. 30–4,Google Scholar and Van, Young, Hacienda and Market, pp. 131–3.Google Scholar

17 ASJ, Cartas, 1859, p. 33.Google Scholar

18 ASJ, Cartas, 1859, p. 400, 1860, p. 362, and 1863, 09 10.Google Scholar

19 ASJ, Diario, , vol. 3, and Mayores, 1856–1864.Google Scholar

20 ASJ, Diario, vol. 2.Google Scholar

21 ASJ, Cartas, , 1860, p. 328.Google Scholar

22 ASJ, Cartas, , 1860, p. 390.Google Scholar

23 Tutino, , 1975, pp. 504–15.Google Scholar

24 ASNM, Cartas, vols. 1, p. 114; 2, p. 151; 3, p. 426; 4, p. 387.Google Scholar

25 ASNM, Cartas, , vol. 5, pp. 40–1.Google Scholar

26 ASNM, Mayores, , vols. 1894–1909.Google Scholar

27 ASNM, Cartas, , vol. 10, pp. 55 and 99.Google Scholar

28 AJ, Mayores, 1858–1865.Google Scholar

29 AJ, Mayores, 1859 and 1863.Google Scholar

30 AJ, Cartas, 1871, 23 03.Google Scholar

31 Riches, N., The Agricultural Revolution in Norfolk (North Carolina, 1937)Google Scholar and Harwood, W. Long, ‘The Development of Mechanization in English Farming’ in Agricultural History Review, 11 (1963), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

32 de Santisteban, J. B., Indicador Particular dcl Administrador de Hacienda (Puebla, 2nd edition, 1903), pp. 181–5.Google Scholar

33 There is an extensive literature on the subject of sharecropping; see for instance Journal of Peasant Studies, x (1983).Google Scholar

34 Appendix I, for sample contracts.

35 AJ, Cartas, 1896, 11 06.Google Scholar

36 AJ, Cartas, 1896, 11 06.Google Scholar

37 Friedrich, Katz, ‘Labour Conditions on Haciendas in Porfirian Mexico: Some Trends and Tendencies’ in HAHR, 54 (1974), 24–6.Google Scholar

38 Emiliano, Busto, Estadística de la República Mexicana vol. 2 (Mexico, 1880), p. 10;Google ScholarFriedrich, Katz, Servidumbre Agraria en México en la época Porfiriana (Mexico, Era Edition, 1980), pp. 104–8,Google Scholar and Frank, Tannenbaum, The Mexican Agrarian Revolution (Washington, 1930), pp. 110–30.Google Scholar Jean Meyer reckons their numbers to have been at least one million in 1910. Jean, Meyer, La Revolución Mexicana, (Barcelona, 1973), p. 20,Google Scholar and Ramón, Eduardo Ruíz have them down as‘the proletariat of rural Mexico’ in his The Great Rebellion, Mexico 1905–1924 (New York, 1982), p. 81.Google Scholar

39 Morin, Michoacán; Brading, Hacienda; del Raso, Notas; and Bazant, ‘Landlord, Labourer.…’, loc. cit.

40 ANQ, Santiago, Torres 1876, p. 90.Google Scholar

41 ASJA, Mayores, 1878–1880.Google Scholar

42 AAA, Mayores, 1885–1890.Google Scholar

43 del, Raso, Notas p. 38, and La Sombra de Arteaga (official bulletin of the government of Querétaro), 22 02 1891.Google Scholar

44 La Sombra de Arteaga, 29 02 1888.Google Scholar

45 Bazant, , ‘Landlord, Labourer…’, pp. 74–8. Bazant in fact accounts for the rise of sharecropping in Bocas in terms of the hacienda's need to bring its tenants under control; any profits produced are depicted as secondary and incidental.Google Scholar

46 Katz, , ‘Labour Conditions…’, loc. cit., pp. 38–9, footnote 108.Google Scholar

47 ANQ, Santiago, Torres 1882, p. 16.Google Scholar

48 Comment by Chris, Scott in Journal of Peasant Studies, 6 (1978), 106–7.Google Scholar

49 Tannenbaum, , Mexican Agrarian Revolution, p. 128.Google Scholar

50 Juan, Martínez-Alier, ‘Peasants and Labourers in southern Spain, Cuba, and Highland Peru’, in Journal of Peasant Studies, 1 (1974), 135.Google Scholar

51 El Agricultor Mexicano, XIX (05 1905), 115.Google Scholar

52 Edith, Boorstein Couturier, ‘Hacienda of Hueyapan: the History of a Mexican Social and Economic Institution (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University, 1965), pp. 158–9.Google Scholar