Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:40:36.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linkages in the New ICT Clusters of Latin America: Evidence from Costa Rica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2012

LUCIANO CIRAVEGNA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper studies the obstacles that hinder the formation of linkages among local firms, multinational corporations and universities in the Costa Rican information and communication technologies cluster. It examines both the social and the economic reasons for forming or participating in linkages, ranging from the capabilities of potential partners to compliance with customs. The research is based on qualitative information collected over four years through more than 150 direct and detailed interviews with different stakeholders in the cluster. Costa Rica is often used as a positive benchmark of cluster policy in Latin America, but it is argued here that linkages among firms in the sector have developed much more slowly than anticipated.

Spanish abstract

Este artículo estudia los obstáculos que dificultan la formación de vínculos inter-organizativos de colaboración entre firmas locales, corporaciones multinacionales y universidades en las agrupaciones de tecnologías de información y comunicación. El material examina las razones tanto sociales como económicas para formar o participar en tales vínculos, que van desde la capacidad de los asociados potenciales hasta el acatar las costumbres de los miembros participantes. La investigación se basa en información cualitativa recolectada durante más de cuatro años a través de más de 150 entrevistas directas y detalladas con diferentes participantes en la agrupación. Costa Rica es utilizada con frecuencia como un punto positivo de comparación sobre las políticas de asociaciones en Latinoamérica, pero se señala aquí que los vínculos entre las firmas en el sector se han desarrollado más lentamente de lo anticipado.

Portuguese abstract

Este artigo estuda os obstáculos que impedem a formação de conexões inter-organizacionais colaborativas entre empresas locais, corporações multinacionais e universidades no cluster (‘agrupamento’) de tecnologia da informação e comunicação de Costa Rica. Examina tanto motivações sociais quanto econômicas para criar ou participar em conexões que variam desde as capacidades de parceiros em potencial à observância de costumes. A pesquisa baseia-se em informações qualitativas coletadas ao longo de quatro anos através de mais de 150 entrevistas diretas e detalhadas com diversas partes interessadas no cluster. Costa Rica frequentemente é citada como exemplo positivo de políticas cluster para a América Latina, porém argumenta-se aqui que conexões entre empresas no setor têm sido desenvolvidas em rítmo muito mais lento do que o previsto.

Keywords

ICT clusterslinkagesCosta RicaLatin Americamultinationalsasociaciones TICvínculosCosta RicaLatinoaméricamultinacionalesclusters TICconexõesCosta RicaAmérica Latinamultinacionais
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , August 2012 , pp. 553 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Iammarino, Simona, Padilla-Perez, Ramon and von Tunzelmann, Nick, ‘Technological Capabilities and Global–Local Interactions: The Electronics Industry in Two Mexican Regions’, World Development, 36: 10 (2008), pp. 1980–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nelson, Roy C., ‘Competing for Foreign Direct Investment: Efforts to Promote Non-Traditional FDI in Costa Rica, Brazil, and Chile’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 30: 3 (2005), pp. 3–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 World Bank, ‘Costa Rica Country Economic Memorandum: The Challenges for Sustained Growth’, Report 36180-CR (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2006); Moran, Theodore H., Harnessing Foreign Direct Investment for Development (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2006), pp. 15–33Google Scholar.

3 Morosini, Piero, ‘Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance’, World Development, 32: 2 (2004), pp. 305–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Porter, Michael E., ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’, Harvard Business Review, 76: 6 (1998), pp. 77–90Google ScholarPubMed; Schmitz, Hubert, ‘Collective Efficiency: Growth Path for Small-Scale Industry’, Journal of Development Studies, 31: 4 (1995), pp. 529–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In this study the term ‘actor’ is used to refer to both individuals (for example, professors) and organisations (for example, firms), depending on the context.

4 Paus, Eva A. and Gallagher, Kevin E., ‘Missing Links: Foreign Investment and Industrial Development in Costa Rica and Mexico’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 43: 1 (2008), pp. 53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ciravegna, Luciano, ‘FDI, Social Ties and Technological Learning in New Silicon Valley Clones’, Journal of Development Studies, 47: 8 (2011), pp. 1178–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Giuliani, Elisa, ‘Multinational Corporations and Patterns of Local Knowledge Transfer in Costa Rican High Tech Industries’, Development and Change, 39: 3 (2008), pp. 385–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Nelson, ‘Competing for Foreign Direct Investment’; Caniëls, Marjolein C. J. and Romijn, Henny A., ‘Agglomeration Advantages and Capability Building in Industrial Clusters: The Missing Link’, Journal of Development Studies, 39: 3 (2003), pp. 129–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Amsden, Alice H. and Chu, Wan-Wen, Beyond Late Development: Taiwan's Upgrading Policies (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Suma S. Athreye, ‘The Indian Software Industry’, in Ashish Arora and Alfonso Gambardella (eds.), From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland, and Israel (Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005), pp. 7–41; Gereffi, Gary and Fernández-Stark, Karina, The Offshore Services Value Chain (Washington, DC: World Bank Development Research Group, 2010)Google Scholar; Hobday, Mike and Rush, Howard, ‘Upgrading the Technological Capabilities of Foreign Transnational Subsidiaries in Developing Countries: The Case of Electronics in Thailand’, Research Policy, 36: 9 (2007), pp. 1335–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kenney, Martin (ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sturgeon, Timothy J., ‘Modular Production Networks: A New American Model of Industrial Organization’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 3 (2002), pp. 451–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Breznitz, Dan, Innovation and the State: Political Choice and Strategies for Growth in Israel, Taiwan and Ireland (London: Yale University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ricardo Monge-Gonzalez and John Hewitt, ‘Innovation, R&D and Productivity in the Costa Rican ICT Sector’, Working Paper Series IDB-WP-189 (Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, 2010).

8 Sturgeon, ‘Modular Production Networks’.

9 Tigre, Paulo, Perspectivas do investimento em tecnologias de informação e comunicação (Rio de Janeiro: UFRJ, Instituto de Economia, 2009)Google Scholar; Monge-Gonzalez and Hewitt, ‘Innovation, R&D and Productivity’.

10 Brusco, Sebastiano, ‘The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralization and Social Integration’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6: 2 (1982), pp. 167–84Google Scholar; Porter, ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’. From here onwards the term ‘linkages’ will be used to mean ‘collaborative inter-organisational linkages’ in order to simplify the text.

11 Piore, Michael J. and Sabel, Charles F., The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (New York: Basic Books, 1984)Google Scholar; Schmitz, ‘Collective Efficiency’.

12 Bell, Martin and Albu, Michael, ‘Knowledge Systems and Technological Dynamism in Industrial Clusters in Developing Countries’, World Development, 27: 9 (1999), pp. 1715–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lall, Sanjaya, ‘Technological Capabilities and Industrialization’, World Development, 20: 2 (1992), pp. 165–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lall, Sanjaya and Narula, Rajneesh, ‘Foreign Direct Investment and its Role in Economic Development: Do We Need a New Agenda?’, European Journal of Development Research, 16: 3 (2004), pp. 447–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Lastres, Elena M. M. and Cassiolato, Jose E., ‘Innovation Systems and Local Productive Arrangements: New Strategies to Promote the Generation, Acquisition and Diffusion of Knowledge’, Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 7 (2005), pp. 172–87Google Scholar; Malerba, Franco, ‘Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production’, Research Policy, 31: 2 (2002), pp. 247–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mansfield, Edwin and Lee, Jeong-Yeon, ‘The Modern University: Contributor to Industrial Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support’, Research Policy, 25: 7 (1996), pp. 1047–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Schmitz, ‘Collective efficiency’.

15 Giuliani, Elisa, Pietrobelli, Carlo and Rabellotti, Roberta, ‘Upgrading in Value Chains: Lessons from Latin American Clusters’, World Development, 33: 4 (2005), pp. 549–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Tigre, Perspectivas do investimento.

17 Kesidou, Effie and Romijn, Henny, ‘Do Local Knowledge Spillovers Matter for Development? An Empirical Study of Uruguay's Software Cluster’, World Development, 36: 10 (2008), pp. 2004–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Narula, Rajneesh and Dunning, John H., ‘Multinational Enterprises, Development and Globalisation: Some Clarifications and a Research Agenda’, Oxford Development Studies, 38: 3 (2010), 263–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Foss, Nicolai and Pedersen, Torben, ‘Transferring Knowledge in MNCs: The Role of Sources of Subsidiary Knowledge and Organizational Context’, Journal of International Management, 8: 1 (2002), pp. 49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gereffi, Gary, Humphrey, John and Sturgeon, Timothy, ‘The Governance of Global Value Chains’, Review of International Political Economy, 12: 1 (2005), pp. 78–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Williamson, Oliver E., Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Control (Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1986)Google Scholar; Timothy Sturgeon, ‘How Silicon Valley Came to Be’, in Kenney (ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley, pp. 15–47.

19 Brusoni, Stefano, Prencipe, Andrea and Pavitt, Keith, ‘Knowledge Specialisation, Organizational Coupling and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make?’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 4 (2001), pp. 597–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Dunning, John H. and Lundan, Sarianna M., Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (2nd edition, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008), pp. 60–82Google Scholar; 292–400.

21 Moran, Harnessing Foreign Direct Investment, pp. 12–25; Hobday and Rush, ‘Upgrading the Technological Capabilities’; Lall, ‘Technological Capabilities and Industrialization’.

22 Grant, Robert M., ‘Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 1 (1996), pp. 109–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Penrose, Edith T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (New York: Wiley, 1959)Google Scholar; Moran, Harnessing Foreign Direct Investment, pp. 12–25; Marin, Anabel and Bell, Martin, ‘Technology Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): An Exploration of the Active Role of MNC Subsidiaries in the Case of Argentina in the 1990s’, Journal of Development Studies, 42: 4 (2006), pp. 678–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 Giuliani, ‘Multinational Corporations and Patterns of Local Knowledge Transfer’; Paus and Gallagher, ‘Missing Links’.

24 Simon, Herbert A., ‘Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning’, Organization Science, 2: 1 (1991), pp. 125–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Whitford, Josh and Zeitlin, Jonathan, ‘Governing Decentralized Production: Institutions, Public Policy and the Prospects for Inter-Firm Collaboration in US Manufacturing’, Industry and Innovation, 11: 1–2 (2004), pp. 11–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

25 Giacomo Becattini, ‘The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion’, in Frank Pyke, Giacomo Becattini and Walter Sengenberger (eds.), Industrial Districts and Interfirm Cooperation in Italy (Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, 1990), pp. 37–51; Morosini, ‘Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance’; Schmitz, ‘Collective Efficiency’.

26 Gambetta, Diego, Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988)Google Scholar; Williamson, Oliver E., ‘Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization’, Journal of Law and Economics, 36: 1 (1993), pp. 453–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Fukuyama, Francis, Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1995)Google Scholar.

28 Farrell, Henry, ‘Trust and Political Economy: Institutions and the Sources of Interfirm Cooperation’, Comparative Political Studies, 38: 5 (2005), pp. 459–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Becattini, ‘The Marshallian Industrial District’, pp. 37–51; Ottati, Gabi Dei, ‘Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in the Industrial District’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18: 6 (1994), pp. 529–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nadvi, Khalid, ‘Shifting Ties: Social Networks in the Surgical Instrument Cluster of Sialkot, Pakistan’, Development and Change, 30: 1 (1999), pp. 141–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Uzzi, Brian, ‘The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect’, American Sociological Review, 61: 4 (1996), p. 674CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Bresnahan, Timothy and Gambardella, Alfonso (eds.), Building High Tech Clusters: Silicon Valley and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Breznitz, Innovation and the State; Monge-Gonzalez and Hewitt, ‘Innovation, R&D and Productivity’; Parrilli, Mario Davide, Bianchi, Patrizio and Sugden, Roger, High Tech Development, Productivity Increases and Networking: A Systemic Approach to the Development of Small and Medium Enterprises (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Saxenian, Anne Lee, The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Riain, Sean Ó, ‘Dominance and Change in the Global Computer Industry: Military, Bureaucratic, and Network State Developmentalism’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 41: 1 (2006), pp. 76–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michael E. Porter and Werner Ketelhohn, ‘Building a Cluster: Electronics and Information Technology in Costa Rica’, Harvard Business School Case 703–422, 2002.

31 Iammarino, Padilla-Perez and Von Tunzelmann, ‘Technological Capabilities and Global–Local Interactions’; Andrés López and Daniela Ramos, ‘La industria de software y servicios informáticos argentina: tendencias, factores de competitividad y clusters’, Working Paper (Buenos Aires: Centro de Investigaciones para la Transformación, Aug. 2008); Tigre, Perspectivas do investimento.

32 Porter, ‘Clusters and the New Economics of Competition’; Porter and Ketelhohn, ‘Building a Cluster’.

33 Paus and Gallagher, ‘Missing Links’; Breznitz, Innovation and the State; Ciravegna, ‘FDI, Social Ties, and Technological Learning’.

34 Saxenian, The New Argonauts; Bresnahan and Gambardella (eds.), Building High Tech Clusters.

35 World Bank Group, Global Investment Promotion Benchmarking, 2009: Summary Report (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009)Google Scholar.

36 Schmitz, ‘Collective Efficiency’; Podolny, Joel M. and Page, Karen L., ‘Network Forms of Organization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (1998), pp. 57–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Laurel Smith-Doerr and Walter W. Powell, ‘Networks and Economic Life’, in Richard Swedberg and Neil J. Smelser (eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), pp. 379–402.

37 North, Douglas C., ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 1 (1991), p. 97CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Colyvas, Jeannette, ‘From Divergent Meanings to Common Practices: The Early Institutionalization of Technology Transfer in the Life Sciences at Stanford University’, Research Policy, 36: 4 (2007), pp. 456–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Granovetter, Mark, ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78: 6 (1973), pp. 1360–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Uzzi, ‘The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness’.

40 Walter W. Powell and Jeannette Colyvas, ‘Microfoundations of Institutional Theory’, in Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Roy Suddaby and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (New York: SAGE, 2008), pp. 276–98.

41 MNCs that operate call centres have not been included in the study.

42 The criteria were suggested by industry experts in order to exclude firms that were registered but might not be fully operational.

43 López, Luis, Kundu, Sumit and Ciravegna, Luciano, ‘Born Global or Born Regional? Evidence from an Exploratory Study in the Costa Rican Software Industry’, Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 7 (2009), pp. 1228–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 For this reason, culture-derived explanations of trust are not discussed further.

45 Farrell, ‘Trust and Political Economy’.

46 Lopez, Kundu and Ciravegna, ‘Born Global or Born Regional?’.

47 Interview with C. Araya, founder of domestic firm, 15 March 2006.

48 Giuliani, ‘Multinational Corporations and Patterns of Local Knowledge Transfer’; Paus and Gallagher, ‘Missing Links’.

49 Interview with L. Chávez, director of Costa Rica Provee, 20 April 2006.

50 Nelson, ‘Competing for Foreign Direct Investment’.

51 Paus and Gallagher, ‘Missing Links’.

52 Interview with director of an MNC subsidiary, name withheld by request, 20 March 2007.

53 Interview with director of an MNC subsidiary, name withheld by request, 24 Feb. 2006. Luciano Ciravegna, Promoting Silicon Valleys in Latin America (London and New York: Routledge, 2012), p. 57.

54 Giuliani, ‘Multinational Corporations and Patterns of Local Knowledge Transfer’.

55 Ciravegna, Luciano, ‘Academia–Private Sector Collaborations in the Costa Rican Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Cluster’, International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 4: 9 (2009), pp. 408–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Paus, Eva, Foreign Investment, Development, and Globalization: Can Costa Rica Become Ireland? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 175–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Ciravegna, ‘Academia–Private Sector Collaborations’.

58 Kelley Porter, Kjersten Bunker Whittington and Walter W. Powell, ‘The Institutional Embeddedness of High Tech Regions: Relational Foundations of the Boston Biotechnology Community’, in Stefano Breschi and Franco Malerba (eds.), Clusters, Networks and Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 261–94; Powell and Colyvas, ‘Microfoundations of Institutional Theory’.

59 Morosini, ‘Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance’.

60 World Bank Group, ‘Costa Rica Country Economic Memorandum’.

61 Paus and Gallagher, ‘Missing Links’; Ciravegna, ‘Academia–Private Sector Collaborations’; Giuliani, ‘Multinational Corporations and Patterns of Local Knowledge Transfer’.

62 Ciravegna, Promoting Silicon Valleys.

63 Ciravegna, ‘Academia–Private Sector Collaborations’.

64 Granovetter, ‘The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes’.

65 Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994)Google Scholar.

66 Ciravegna, Promoting Silicon Valleys.

67 Saxenian, The New Argonauts.

68 Antonio J. Botelho, Giancarlo Stefanuto and Francisco Veloso, ‘The Brazilian Software Industry’, in Ashish Arora and Alfonso Gambardella (eds.), From Underdogs to Tigers: The Rise and Growth of the Software Industry in Brazil, China, India, Ireland and Israel (London: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 99–129; Gereffi, Castillo and Fernandez-Stark, The Offshore Services Industry; Lopez, Kundu and Ciravegna, ‘Born Global or Born Regional?’.