Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
In the thirty years between 1950 and 1980, Latin America experienced rapid growth. During this period, output expanded at an annual rate of 5.5% with per capita increases averaging 2.7% a year. Table 1 provides country details. The star is clearly Brazil, whose share in regional product increased from less than a quarter to more than a third. At the other extreme are two groups: the Southern Cone (Argentina, Chile and Uruguay), whose mid-century leading position in the region was eroded by below average performance; and a group of smaller countries, including several in Central America. On average, Latin America's record, viewed from an immediate post-World War II perspective, is impressive. It far exceeded the target of the Alliance for Progress implemented in 1961, which called for an annual rate of 2% per capita. It also compared very favourably with European per capita income growth in the aftermath of the Industrial Revolution, which was 1.3% from 1850 to 1900 and 1.4% between 1900 and 1950. Long-term US economic growth has been at 1.8%.
Yet two factors combine to make the 1950–80 Latin American growth performance seem less positive. One is its dramatic reversal in the 1980s, a period in which GDP per capita fell by 8.3%. By 1989, with the exception of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and the Dominican Republic, per capita GDP had fallen below its 1980 level. At the extreme, Venezuela, Nicaragua and El Salvador show levels below those attained in 1960. The 1980s have truly been a lost decade and thus one tends to underestimate the earlier achievement.
1 See Maddison, A., Two Crises: Latin America and Asia, 1929–38 and 1973–83 (Paris, 1985), p. 53.Google Scholar
2 See Lai, D., The Poverty of Development Economics (Cambridge, Mass., 1985), p. 103.Google Scholar
3 There is a vast literature on the economic development of Latin America. See, for instance, Baer, W. and Samuelson, L. (eds.), Latin America in the Post-Import-Substitution Era (New York, 1977)Google Scholar; Corbo, V., ‘Problems, Development Theory and Strategies of Latin America’, in Ranis, G. and Schultz, T. P. (eds.), The State of Development Economics (New York, 1988)Google Scholar; Dietz, J. and Street, J., Latin America's Economic Development: Institutionalist and Structuralist Perspectives (Boulder, 1987)Google Scholar; Fishlow, A., ‘Origins and Consequences of Import Substitution in Brazil’, in di Marco, L. E. (ed.), International Economics and Development (New York, 1972)Google Scholar; Hirschman, A., ‘The Political Economy of Latin American Development”, Latin American Research Review, vol. 22, no. 3 (1987), pp. 7–36Google Scholar; Hirschman, A., ‘The Political Economy of Import Substituting Industrialisation in Latin America’, Quarterly: Journal of Economics (1968)Google Scholar; Klaren, P. and Bossert, T., Promises of Development: Theories of Change in Latin America (Boulder, 1986)Google Scholar; and Sheahan, J., Patterns of Development in Latin America (Princeton, 1987).Google Scholar
4 Grilli, E. and Yang, M. C., ‘Primary Commodity Prices, Manufactured Goods Prices and the Terms of Trade of Developing Countries: What the Long Run Shows’, The World Rank Economic Review (Jan. 1988), pp. 1–48.Google Scholar
5 All Latin American countries except Cuba and Haiti, for lack of data. The countries are Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela.
6 See Cardoso, E., ‘Hyperinflation in Latin America’, Challenge (1989)Google Scholar for a brief summary.
7 Stabilisation programmes were implemented, for instance, in Chile (1956–8, 1973–8), Argentina (1959–62, 1976–8), Bolivia (1956), Peru (1959, 1975–8), Uruguay (1959–62, 1974–8), Mexico (1983), and Brazil (1964–8, 1982–3).
8 Pastor, M., ‘The Effects of IMF programmes on the Third World: Debate and Evidence from Latin America”, World Development (Feb. 1987).Google Scholar
9 Ramos, J.. Neo-Conservative Economics in the Southern Cone of Latin America (Baltimore, 1986).Google Scholar
10 See also the special issues of Economic Development and Cultural Change, April 1986Google Scholar and World Development, August 1985.Google Scholar
11 Cuba, Haiti, and Nicaragua are excluded from the sample because of the lack of data.
12 See Canarella, G. and Pollard, S., ‘Unanticipated Monetary Growth, Output, and the Price Level in Latin America: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Development Economics (April 1989), pp. 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 See Cardoso, E. and Helwege, A., ‘Below the Line: Poverty in Latin America’, World Development (Jan. 1992), pp. 19–37Google Scholar, for a survey of the literature on poverty in Latin America.
14 Altimir, O., The Extent of Poverty in Latin America, World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 522 (Washington, D.C., 1982).Google Scholar
15 See Musgrove, P., ‘Food Needs and Absolute Poverty in Urban South America’, Review of Income and Wealth (March 1985), pp. 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 See Molina, S., ‘Poverty: Description and Analysis of Policies for Overcoming it’, CEPAL Review (December 1982), pp. 87–110.Google Scholar
17 See Merrick, T., ‘Population since 1945’, in Bacha, E. L. and Klein, H. S. (eds.), Social Change in Brazil: The Incomplete Transition (Albuquerque, 1989).Google Scholar