Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:27:58.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Guatemala Will Never Change’: Radical Pessimism and the Politics of Personal Interest in the Western Highlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2011

NICK COPELAND
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how neoliberal multicultural governance shapes the political imaginaries and practices of rural indigenous Guatemalans in the town of San Pedro Necta. Decades of counter-insurgency warfare have displaced radical politics into sanctioned forms of ethnic empowerment, memory and development, but most indigenous sampedranos have maintained radical investments. Persistent political violence, stalled reforms and clientelist favouritism undermined multicultural inclusion, development and optimism regarding the 1996 peace accords, and weakened community autonomy. The resulting mix of pessimism, unmet needs and divisionism has discouraged progressive politics and normalised political disengagement and, increasingly, self-interested affiliations with multiple conservative parties, including corrupt authoritarian populists implicated in genocide.

Spanish abstract

Este artículo examina cómo la gobernabilidad neoliberal multicultural da forma a imaginarios políticos y prácticas de los indígenas rurales guatemaltecos en el poblado de San Pedro Necta. Décadas de conflicto y contrainsurgencia desplazaron formas políticas radicales hacia formas permitidas de empoderamiento étnico, de memoria y de desarrollo, pero la mayoría de los indígenas sanpedranos mantuvieron sus posiciones radicales. El optimismo generado por los acuerdos de paz de 1996, por el multiculturalismo y por los nuevos proyectos de desarrollo fue socavado por la continuada violencia política y el favoritismo clientelista que erosionó la autonomía comunitaria. La resultante mezcla de pesimismo, de necesidades insatisfechas y de divisionismo desestimuló el desarrollo de políticas progresistas y normalizó el desenganche político. Al mismo tiempo, se fueron consolidando afiliaciones de auto-interés con múltiples partidos conservadores, incluso populistas autoritarias y corruptos implicados en el genocidio.

Portuguese abstract

Examina-se como a governança multicultural neoliberal lapida os imaginários e as práticas políticas de guatemaltecos indígenas rurais na cidade de San Pedro Necta. As décadas do conflito e contra-insurgência deslocaram políticas radicais hacia formas sancionadas de empodeiramento, memória e desenvolvimento étnico, porém a maioria dos indígenas de San Pedro mantiveram investimentos posturas radicais. O otimismo relacionado aos acordos de paz de 1996, o multiculturalismo e os novos projetos de desenvolvimento foram corroídos por violência política contínua e por favoritismo clientelista que sabotou a autonomia comunitária. A mistura resultante de pessimismo, demandas não realizadas, e divisionismo desincentivou as políticas progressistas e normalizou o desengajamento político. Se consolidaram afiliações baseadas em interesses pessoais com múltiplos partidos conservadores, incluindo populistas autoritários implicados no genocídio.

Keywords

GuatemalaMayademocracyneoliberal multiculturalismthe stateindigenous politicspolitical imaginariesmulticulturalismo neoliberalEstadopolíticas indígenasimaginarios políticosGuatemalademocraciamulticulturalismo neoliberalo Estadopolíticas indígenasimaginários políticosGuatemalademocracia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 485 - 515
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 World Bank, ‘Guatemala, evaluación de la pobreza: buen desempeño a bajo nivel’, Departamento América Central, Informe 43920-GT (World Bank, 2009).

2 Many Mayas joined the movement for compensating former members of the patrulleros de autodefensa civil (civil self-defence patrols, PAC), army-mandated paramilitaries established to suffocate guerrilla support, who were notorious for human rights abuses: see de Tejada, Ricardo Saenz, ¿Victimas o vencedores? Una aproximación al movimiento de los ex-PAC (Guatemala: FLACSO, 2004)Google Scholar. On support for the Right, see Kay B. Warren, ‘Voting Against Indigenous Rights in Guatemala: Lessons from the 1999 Referendum’, in Kay B. Warren and Jean E. Jackson (eds.), Indigenous Movements, Self-Representation, and the State in Latin America (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2003), pp. 149–76.

3 Tribuno Supremo Electoral, Memoria de las elecciones (Guatemala, 2003)Google Scholar.

4 Solano, Luis, Guatemala: petróleo y minería en las entrañas del poder (Guatemala City: Inforpress Centroamericano, 2005)Google Scholar; Benjamin Witte, ‘Multinational Gold Rush in Guatemala’, in Teo Ballvé and Vijay Prashad (eds.), Dispatches from Latin America: On the Frontlines against Neoliberalism (Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2007), pp. 316–24; and Fulmer, Amanda, Godoy, Angelina and Neff, Jason, ‘Indigenous Rights, Resistance and the Law: Lessons From a Guatemalan Mine’, Latin American Politics and Society, 50: 4 (2008), pp. 91–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Hershberg, Eric and Rosen, Fred (eds.), Latin America After Neoliberalism: Turning the Tide in the 21st Century? (New York: New Press, 2006)Google Scholar;Ballvé, and Prashad, (eds.), Dispatches from Latin AmericaGoogle Scholar.

6 David Stoll, ‘Harvest of Conviction: Solidarity in Guatemala Scholarship, 1988–2008’, in Walter E. Little and Timothy J. Smith (eds.), Mayas in Postwar Guatemala: Harvest of Violence Revisited (Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 2009), pp. 167–80.

7 J. Jailey Philpot-Munson, ‘Peace Under Fire: Understanding Evangelical Resistance to the Peace Process in a Postwar Mayan Town’, in Little and Smith (eds.), Mayas in Postwar Guatemala, pp. 42–53.

8 Beatriz Manz, ‘Terror, Grief, and Recovery: Genocidal Trauma in a Mayan Village in Guatemala’, in Alexander Laban Hinton (ed.), Annihilating Difference: The Anthropology of Genocide (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002), pp. 292–309; and Sanford, Victoria, Buried Secrets: Truth and Human Rights in Guatemala (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), p. 158CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 See Hale, Charles R., Más que un indio (More than an Indian): Racial Ambivalence and Neoliberal Multiculturalism in Guatemala (Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2006)Google Scholar; and Benson, Peter, Fisher, Edward F. and Thomas, Kedron, ‘Resocializing Suffering: Neoliberalism, Accusation, and the Sociopolitical Context of Guatemala's New Violence’, Latin American Perspectives, 435: 5 (2008), pp. 38–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Many authors have explored indigenous experiences of democracy in Latin America: see, especially, Yashar, Deborah, Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 See Ekern, Stener, ‘The Production of Autonomy: Leadership and Community in Mayan Guatemala’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 43: 1 (2011), pp. 93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and ‘Visions of the Right Order: Contrasts Between Mayan Communitarian Law in Guatemala and International Human Rights Law’, in Lone Lindholt and Sten Schaumburg-Müller (eds.), Human Rights in Development Yearbook, 2003: Human Rights and Local/Living Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2005), pp. 265–90.

12 Foucault, Michel et al. , The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Rose, Nikolas, The Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Comisión de Esclarecimiento Historico (CEH), Guatemala: memoria del silencio (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1999)Google Scholar; Proyecto Interdiocesano Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica (REMHI), Guatemala: nunca más (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1998)Google Scholar; Schirmer, Jennifer, The Guatemalan Military Project: A Violence Called Democracy (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, Carol, ‘Militarization of Civil Society in Guatemala: Economic Reorganization as a Continuation of War’, Latin American Perspectives, 17: 4 (1990), pp. 8–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nelson, Diane M., Finger in the Wound: Body Politics in Quincentennial Guatemala (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

14 Begoña Aretxaga, ‘A Fictional Reality: Paramilitary Death Squads and the Construction of State Terror in Spain’, in Jeffry A. Sluka (ed.), Death Squad: The Anthropology of State Terror (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000), pp. 47–69; Aretxaga, Begoña, ‘Maddening States’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 32 (2003), pp. 393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Brown, Wendy, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Butler, Judith, The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

15 Gaonkar, Dilip, ‘Towards New Imaginaries: An Introduction’, Public Culture, 14: 1 (2002), p. 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 Feldman, Alan, Formations of Violence: The Narrative of the Body and Political Terror in Northern Ireland (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Das, Veena and Kleinmann, Arthur (eds.), Remaking a World: Violence, Social Suffering, and Recovery (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Das, Veena and Poole, Deborah (eds.), Anthropology in the Margins of the Nation-State (Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 2004), p. 3Google Scholar.

18 Ibid.; Hanson, Thomas and Stepputat, Finn (eds.), States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983)Google Scholar; Taussig, Michael, The Magic of the State (New York and London: Routledge, 1997)Google Scholar; Aretxaga, ‘Maddening States’ and ‘A Fictional Reality’; Akhil Gupta and James Ferguson, ‘Spatializing States: An Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality’, American Ethnologist, 29: 4 (2002), pp. 981–1002Google Scholar.

20 Hale, Charles R., ‘Does Multiculturalism Menace? Governance, Cultural Rights, and the Politics of Identity in Guatemala’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 34: 3 (2002), pp. 485–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Más que un indio. This diverges from approaches that view neoliberal governance exclusively in terms of promoting free-market individualism.

21 Ibid., p. xvii.

22 Nelson, Reckoning, p. 258.

23 Timothy J. Smith, ‘Democracy is Dissent: Political Confrontations and Indigenous Mobilization in Sololá’, in Little and Smith (eds.), Mayas in Postwar Guatemala, pp. 16–29; Stoll, ‘Harvest of Conviction’; Metz, Brent, Mariano, Lorenzo and Garcia, Julián Lopez, ‘The Violence After “La Violencia” in the Ch'orti’ Region of Eastern Guatemala’, Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 15: 1 (2010), pp. 16–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nelson, Reckoning, pp. 48–9.

24 Secretaría General de Planificación (SEGEPLAN), Indices de pobreza y pobreza extrema (Guatemala: SEGEPLAN, 2009)Google Scholar.

25 For discussions of highland communities, see Handy, Jim, Revolution in the Countryside: Rural Conflict and Agrarian Reform, 1944–1954 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Watanabe, Jon, Maya Saints and Souls in a Changing World (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1997)Google Scholar.

26 Handy, Revolution in the Countryside.

27 For a description of the cargo system in Mayan communities, see Watanabe, Maya Saints and Souls, pp. 106–26.

28 Warren, Kay B., The Symbolism of Subordination: Indian Identity in a Guatemalan Town (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

29 Douglass Brintnall describes a similar process in the town of Aguacatán, Huehuetenango, in Revolt Against the Dead: The Modernization of a Mayan Community in the Highlands of Guatemala (New York: Gordon and Breach, 1979).

30 Falla, Ricardo, Quiché Rebelde: estudio de un movimiento de conversión religiosa, rebelde a las creencias tradicionales, en San Antonio Ilotenango, Quiché (1948–1970) (Ciudad Universitaria, Guatemala: Editorial Universitaria, 1980)Google Scholar.

31 Kobrak, Paul, Huehuetenango: historia de una guerra (Huehuetenango: Centro de Estudios y Documentación de la Frontera Noroeste de Guatemala, 2003)Google Scholar.

32 Grandin, Greg, The Last Colonial Massacre: Guatemala and the Cold War (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2004), p. 196CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Ibid., p. 182.

34 Ibid., p. 196.

35 REHMI, Guatemala: nunca más; CEH, Guatemala: memoria del silencio; Sanford, Buried Secrets.

36 Smith, ‘Militarization of Civil Society in Guatemala’; Nelson, Finger in the Wound.

37 CEH, Guatemala: memoria del silencio, vol. 4: Consecuencia y efectos de la violencia. Casos 5322, 5052 and 5527 describe incidents in San Pedro.

38 Hale, Más que un indio.

39 Schirmer, The Guatemalan Military Project.

40 This was part of a broader transformation in village governance in which younger, modernising Mayanist leaders, including some military commissioners, through their role as leaders in the PAC and of new development committees, displaced the alcaldes auxiliares as the dominant form of village authority.

41 Carlota McAllister, ‘“Good People”: Revolution, Community and Conciencia in a Maya K'iche Village in Guatemala’, unpubl. PhD diss., Johns Hopkins University, 2003, p. 322 (also cited in Nelson, Reckoning).

42 See Jonas, Susanne, Of Centaurs and Doves: Guatemala's Peace Process (Boulder, CO: Westview, 2000)Google Scholar; and Alarcón, Rosalinda Hernandez, The Land Issue in the Peace Accords: A Summary of the Government's Response (Guatemala City: Inforpress Centroamericana, 1998)Google Scholar.

43 Moser, Caroline and McIlwane, Catherine, ‘Poverty, Violence and Livelihood Security in Urban Colombia and Guatemala’, Progress in Development Studies, 3: 2 (2004), pp. 113–30Google Scholar; Peter Benson and Michael Fisher, ‘Neoliberal Violence: Social Suffering in Guatemala's Postwar Era’, in Little and Smith (eds.), Mayas in Postwar Guatemala, pp. 151–66.

44 Ibid., p. 153.

45 See, for example, Amnesty International, Amnesty International Report 2009 – Guatemala (28 May 2009), available at www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4a1fade8c.html.

46 Solano, Guatemala: petróleo y minería; Witte, ‘Multinational Gold Rush’; Fulmer et al., ‘Lessons from a Guatemalan Mine’.

47 Benson, Fischer and Thomas, ‘Resocializing Suffering’.

48 Nelson, Reckoning.

49 The UNE won the presidential elections in San Pedro in 2007, but the conservative Unión Democrática (Democratic Union, UD) won the mayoral elections.

50 ‘Huehuetenango: Ex-PAC frustran mitin con Rios Montt’, Prensa Libre, 5 Sep. 2003.

51 Nelson, Reckoning.

52 Many specifically oppose the efforts of human rights advocates that they feel ‘let criminals free’. Other conceptions of human rights are widely supported.

53 Nelson, Reckoning.

54 McAllister, ‘“Good People”’.

55 See ‘San Pedro Necta rechazó la minería’, available at www.inforpressca.com/municipal/boletin/141-3.htm.

56 Grandin, The Last Colonial Massacre; Nelson makes similar observations in Finger in the Wound and Reckoning.

57 Warren, ‘Voting Against Indigenous Rights’, p. 176, n. 1.

58 Tribuno Supremo Electoral, Memoria de las elecciones (2003 and 2007).

59 Fox, Jonathan, ‘The Difficult Transition From Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico’, World Politics, 46: 2 (1994), pp. 151–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 Ibid.

61 Auyero, Javier, ‘The Logic of Clientelism in Argentina: An Ethnographic Account’, Latin American Research Review, 35: 3 (2000), p. 58Google Scholar.

62 Ibid., p. 61.

63 McAllister, ‘“Good People”’, p. 333.

64 Ekern, ‘The Production of Autonomy’ and ‘Visions of the Right Order’.

65 Finn Stepputat, ‘Urbanizing the Countryside: Armed Conflict, State Formation, and the Politics of Place in Contemporary Guatemala’, in Hanson and Stepputat (eds.), States of Imagination, pp. 298–9.

66 Nelson, Reckoning, p. 71.

67 Rasch, Elizabeth Dueholm, ‘Quetzaltenango's First Mayan Mayor: Transforming Political Culture and the Politics of Belonging’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 43: 1 (2011), pp. 121–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Bayart, Jean François, L’état en Afrique: la politique du ventre (Paris: Fayard, 1989)Google Scholar. This has been translated as The State in Africa: The Politics of the Belly (Cambridge: Polity, 2009).

69 Hale, ‘Does Multiculturalism Menace?’.

70 ‘Maestros de Huehuetenango exigen pago de salarios atrasados’, Prensa Libre, 23 March 2010.

71 See Kaltschmitt, Alfred, ‘Como causar una revuelta de dos platos’, Prensa Libre, 21 Jan. 2005Google Scholar.

72 Walter Benjamin, ‘Critique of Violence’, in Reflections (New York: Schocken Books, 1923), pp. 277–300; Derrida, Jacques, ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundations of Authority’, Cardozo Law Review, 11 (1990), pp. 921–1045Google Scholar.