Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:00:55.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Estado Docente and its Expansion: Spanish American Elementary Education, 1900–1950*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Carlos Newland
Carlos Newland
Affiliation:
Carlos Newland is Visiting Professor at the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Among the most outstanding changes that occurred in Spanish America during the first half of the twentieth century is the transformation in the area of education. Two salient features deserve emphasis. First, this change was quantitative: many more children came to attend school, and a greater proportion of the inhabitants became literate. Second, this increase in schooling came about within a homogeneous institutional framework. It was the Estado Docente – personified in national and provincial governments – which was the principal vehicle for educational services and which determined the contents of the curricula. The purpose of this article is to present a brief sketch of the most significant characteristics of this transformation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 449 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 On the general context see Benavot, A. and Riddle, Ph., ‘The expansion of primary education, 1870–1940: trends and issues’, Sociology of Education, vol. 61 (07 1988), pp. 191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 On Spanish-American education in the nineteenth century see Newland, C., ‘La education elemental en Hispanoamérica: desde la independencia hasta la centralización de los sistemas educativos nacionales’, Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 71, no. 2 (05 1991), pp. 335–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sauter, G. Ossenbach, ‘La instauración de los sistemas de instructión pública en Hispanoamérica’, Poderj Control, vol. 1 (1988), pp. 127–44Google Scholar.

3 See Fuentes, D. Diaz, ‘Crisis y cambios estructurales en America latina: Un analisis comparado de la evolution economica y fiscal de Argentina, Brasil y Mexico en el período de entreguerras’, Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, 1992Google Scholar.

4 These figures are calculated on the basis of Flora, P., ‘Historical processes of social mobilization: urbanization and literacy 1850–1965’, in Eisenstadt, S. N. and Rokker, S. (eds.), building States and Nations (Beverly Hills, 1973), pp. 242–3Google Scholar, and Sánchez-Albornoz, N., La población de América Latina. Desde los tiempos precolombinos al ańo 2000 (Madrid, 1973), pp. 192; 212Google Scholar.

5 Sánchez-Albornoz, La población de América Latina, pp. 192; 212.

6 This is the average growth in the number of teachers in Argentina Costa Rica, Cuba Chile, Mexico and Uruguay. Taken from Mitchell, B. R., International Historical Statistics. The Americas and Australasia (London, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Literacy in 1950 presents a positive relationship with income per capita and with the degree of urbanisation. The relationship is weaker when enrolment as a percentage of total population is taken as an explanatory variable, undoubtedly because of its defects as an indicator given different population pyramids, school drop-out, etc.

8 Urrutia, C. Godoy, Analfabetismo en América (Guatemala, 1952), p. 26Google Scholar.

9 The proportions correspond to a sample of countries. See Havinghurst, R. J. et al. , La sociedady la educación en America Latina (Buenos Aires, 1962), pp. 114–15Google Scholar.

10 See in general Unesco, L'Analphabétisme dans le monde au milieu du XXe siècle (Paris, 1957)Google Scholar.

11 See Newland, C., ‘Spanish American elementary education before Independence: continuity and change in a colonial environment’, Itinerario, vol. 15, no. 2 (1991), pp. 83–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 In 1926 in Venezuela 4.7% of those who could read could not write (Unesco, L'Analphabétisme dans le monde, p. 57). In Guatemala by 1950 this difference was insignificant (Abel, J. F. and Bond, N. J., ‘Illiteracy in the several countries of the world’, Bulletin – Department of the Interior – Bureau of Education, no. 4 (1929), p. 43)Google Scholar. In Mexico it fell from 13 % in 1895 to 7.8% in 1910 (Guerra, F., México: del Antiguo Régimen a la Revolución, 2 vols. (México, 1988), vol. 1, p. 416)Google Scholar.

13 Unesco, L'Analphabétisme dans le monde, p. 15.

14 Flora, ‘Historical processes of social mobilization’, p. 227.

15 See for example Zimmerman, E., ‘Racial ideas and social reform: Argentina, 1880–1916’, Hispanic American Historical Review, vol. 72, no. 1 (02 1992), pp. 23–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar. (This article contains a bibliography on the topic for Latin America as a whole).

16 Data for the 1940s. See Pierson, W. and Gil, F., Governments of Latin America (New York, 1957), p. 9Google Scholar.

17 On positivism see Zea, L. (ed.), Pensamiento Positivista Latinoamericano, 2 vols. (Caracas, 1980)Google Scholar; Biagini, H. (ed.), El movimiento positivista argentino (Buenos Aires, 1985)Google Scholar and Ch. Hale, A., ‘Political and social ideas in Latin America, 1870–1930’, in Bethell, L. (ed.), Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. 4 (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 367–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 The economy and Latin American public finance between 1880 and 1930 have been described in Conde, R. Cortés and Hunt, Sh. (eds.), The Latin American Economies: Growth and the Export Sector 1880–1930 (New York, 1985)Google Scholar.

19 Vasconi, T., Ideologia, lucha de clasesy aparatos educativos en el desarrollo de América Latina (Caracas, 1974), p. 116Google Scholar.

20 Godoy Urrutia, Analjabetismo en América, p. 214.

21 Godoy Urrutia, Analjabetismo en América, p. 210. In Chile between 1900 and 1930 the funds dedicated to education (measured in British currency) grew roughly sevenfold (Labarca, A., Historia de la enseñianza en Chile (Santiago, 1939), p. 275Google Scholar). In Cuba between 1902 and 1952 the budgetary share was kept in the order of 20% (Tudurí, M. García, ‘La educación en Cuba’, in La enciclopedia de Cuba (San Juan, 1977), vol. 8, p. 433Google Scholar). In Venezuela the proportion was around 6% between 1908 and 1922 Historical Sketch of the Fiscal Life of Venezuela (Caracas, 1925), p. 30).

22 This was the case with Argentina (the only country with a seven-year primary education), Costa Rica, Cuba, Mexico and Puerto Rico.

23 Rivarola, H., Legislatión escolar y ciencia de la educatión (Buenos Aires, 1936), p. 222Google Scholar.

24 Vaughan, M. K., Estado, clases sotialesy education en México, 2 vols. (México, 1982), vol. 1, pp. 240–7Google Scholar. By 1941 the federation managed practically 60% of the primary schools.

25 Hanson, E. M., Educational Reform and Administrative Development: the Cases of Colombia and Venezuela (Stanford, 1986), pp. 162–4Google Scholar.

26 Fermín, M., Mementos históricos de la educatión venezolana (Caracas, 1973), p. 127Google Scholar.

27 On the case of Puerto Rico see Clarkson, D., ‘Formative influences in Puerto Rican education’, in Brock, C. and Clarkson, D. (eds.), Education in Central America and the Caribbean (London, 1990), pp. 7–62Google Scholar. On Cuba see García Tudurí, ‘La educación en Cuba’, p. 429.

28 On the Guatemalan escalafón of 1947 see Orellana, C. González, Historia de la educación en Guatemala (Guatemala, 1970), pp. 503–4Google Scholar. On the Mexican escalafón of 1933, see Britton, J., Educacioń y radicalismo en México, 2 vols. (México, 1976), vol. 1, pp. 88–9Google Scholar. On the Colombian escalafón, see Casallas, L. Bohórquez, La evolution educativa en Colombia (Bogotá, 1956), pp. 459–61Google Scholar.

29 Barcos, J., Cómo Educa el Estado a tu Hijo (Buenos Aires, 1928)Google Scholar. On the criticism of the Estado Docente in Argentina see Puiggrós, A., Sujetos, disciplina y curriculum en los orígenes del sistema educative argentino (Buenos Aires, 1990)Google Scholar.

30 From the prologue written by Gabriela Mistral to the above-mentioned book of Barcos, Cómo Educa el Estado a tu Hijo, pp. 7–21.

31 Unesco, Evolución y situación actual de la educación en América Latina (Madrid, 1970), pp. 42–67Google Scholar.

32 On these topics see Vaughn, Estado, clases sociales y educación en México, vol. 1, p. 122; Paulston, R., Society, schools and progress in Peru (Oxford, 1971), p. 55Google Scholar; Spalding, H. Jr, ‘Education in Argentina, 1890–1914: the limits of oligarchical reform’, journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 3, no. 1 (Summer 1972), pp. 50–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 On the ‘New School’ see Bralich, J., Breve historia de la educatión en el Uruguay (Montevideo, 1987), pp. 82–3Google Scholar; A. Ferrière, La Educatión Nueva en Chile 1828–1930 (Madrid, n. d.); A. Ramírez Figueroa, La Escuela Nuevay la didáctica de la historia del Perú (n. p., n. d.); Vaughan, Estado, clases sociales y educatión en México, vol. 1, pp. 307–9.

34 Godoy Urrutia, Analfabetismo en América, p. 143.

35 Unesco, Evolutión y situatión actual de la educatión en América Latina, p. 67. On the persistence of traditional methods in Colombia see Helg, A., Civiliser le peuple et former les élites. L'éducation en Colombie 1918–1957 (Paris, 1984), pp. 46–57Google Scholar.

36 Barcos, Cómo educa el Estado a tu hijo, pp. 150; 162.

37 Septien, V. Torres, ‘Algunos aspectos de las escuelas particulares en el siglo XX’, Historia Mexicana, vol. 33, no. 3 (01/03 1984), pp. 365–6Google Scholar.

38 In Argentina there was a return to teaching religion in national schools from 1943 to 1955. The provinces had autonomy in the schools that they administered.

39 On the Mexican case see Gurza, F. Arce, ‘En busca de una educación revolucionaria: 1924–1934’, in Vésquez, J. Z. et al. , Ensayos sobre la historia de la educación en México (México, 1988), pp. 145–87Google Scholar; Sanders, T. G., ‘Mexican education: the post-revolutionary period (1920–1940)’, American Universities Field Staff Reports, no. 36 (1978)Google Scholar.

40 See Escudé, C., El fracaso del proyecto argentine Educación e ideología (Buenos Aires, 1990)Google Scholar; Plotkin, M., ‘Política, educación y nacionalismo en el Centenario’, Todo es Historia, vol. 221 (09 1985), pp. 64–79Google Scholar.

41 Vaughn, Estado, clases sociales y educación en México, vol. 1, p. 70.

42 Hanson, Educational Reform and Administrative Development, p. 31.

43 Régimen de la enseñanza primaria en Colombia 1903–1948 (Bogotá, 1950), pp. 371–4.

44 González Orellana, Historia de la educación en Guatemala, pp. 332–60.

45 Ibid., p. 317.

46 Quoted in Martínez, R. Bolaños, ‘Orígenes de la educación pública en México’, in Solana, F. et al. , Historia de la educación pública en México (México, 1982), p. 58Google Scholar.

47 Rubin, J., ‘Language and education in Paraguay’, in Belle, Th. La (ed.), Education and Development: Latin America and The Caribbean (Los Angeles, 1972), p. 553Google Scholar.

48 See respectively González Orellana, Historia de la educación en Guatemala, p. 313; Arce Gurza, ‘En busca de una educación revolucionaria’, p. 157.

49 On the Mexican case see Beltrán, G. Aguirre, Teoría y práctica de la educación indigena (México, 1973)Google Scholar.

50 Valcarcel, C., Breve historia de la educación peruana (Lima, 1975), p. 203Google Scholar.

51 Canqui, R. Choque, ‘Una experiencia histórica de la educación indígena en Bolivia’, in Amodío, E. (ed.), Educación, escuelas y cultura indigenas de América (Quito, 1986), p. 58Google Scholar.

52 Labarca, A., Historia de la enseñanza en Chile (Santiago, 1939), p. 281Google Scholar.

53 See figures in Unesco, L'éducation dans le Monde: I'enseignement du premier degré (Paris, 1960)Google Scholar.

54 Although this affirmation is based on evidence from more recent years, we believe that it can be applied to the period under consideration. See Izquierdo, C. Muñoz and Medina, A. Fernández, ‘Financiamiento de la educación privada en América latina’, in Brodersohn, M. and Sanjurjo, M. E. (eds.), Financiamiento de la educación en América latina (México, 1978), pp. 255–97Google Scholar; Izquierdo, C. Muñoz, ‘Socioeconomía de la educación privada y pública: El caso de México’, Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, vol. 11, no. 1 (1981), pp. 111–32Google Scholar.

55 On the private schools in Mexico see Torres Septien, ‘Algunos aspectos de las escuelas particulares’. On the schools of the Italian community in Argentina see Favero, L., ‘Las escuelas de las sociedades italianas en la Argentina (1866–1914)’, in Devoto, F. and Rosoli, G. (eds.), La inmigración italiana en la Argentina (Buenos Aires, 1985), pp. 165–207Google Scholar.

56 On the Argentine religious associations see Bruno, C., Historia de la lglesia en Argentina, 12 vols. (Buenos Aires, 1966–), especially vol. 12; on Colombia see Helg, Civiliser le peuple et former les élites, pp. 55–64Google Scholar.

57 At the beginning of the century, they represented about 20% of the Mexican private sector (before their prohibition). See Guerra, México: del Antiguo Régimen a la Revolutión, vol. 1, p. 411. In Argentina at the end of the nineteenth century, they comprised 25% of the institutions. See Tedesco, J. C., Educatión y sociedad en la Argentina (Buenos Aires, 1982), p. 109Google Scholar.