Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:51:00.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constructing ‘Farmer’ and ‘State’ Identities in Moral Discourses about Semi-subsistence Agriculture in North-east Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

KAREN PENNESI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anthropological analysis elucidates how discourses about agriculture in one North-east Brazilian community reflect relational roles of citizens and the state, the position of farmers in society, and the relationship of individuals to their work. In these discourses, farmers are positioned as moral, hard-working, autonomous citizens, justifying their participation in low-paying activities. The declining numbers of agricultural workers is explained as a result of individual laziness or government irresponsibility. In using these discourses to take stances publicly on agricultural issues, speakers assign responsibilities and moral status to agents. In constructing rural identities, such moral discourses emphasise the symbolic value of subsistence agriculture as its economic value declines.

Spanish abstract

El análisis antropológico señala cómo los discursos acerca de la agricultura en una comunidad nordestina de Brasil reflejan los papeles relacionales de los ciudadanos y el estado, la posición de los agricultores en la sociedad, y las relaciones de individuos y sus trabajos. En estos discursos, los agricultores son ubicados como ciudadanos morales, autónomos, y muy trabajadores, lo que justifica el bajo ingreso de sus actividades. El declive del número de agricultores se explica como el resultado de la pereza individual o la irresponsabilidad gubernamental. Al usar esos discursos para tomar posiciones públicas sobre temas de agricultura, se asignan responsabilidades y estatus moral a los agentes. Al construir identidades rurales, dichos discursos morales enfatizan el valor simbólico de la agricultura de subsistencia mientras que su valor económico declina.

Portuguese abstract

A análise antropológica elucida a maneira pela qual os discursos sobre agricultura em uma comunidade do nordeste brasileiro refletem papéis relacionais dos cidadãos e do estado, a posição dos agricultores na sociedade, e a relação dos indivíduos com seu trabalho. Nestes discursos, agricultores são colocados como cidadãos morais, trabalhadores e autônomos, justificando suas participações em atividades de baixa remuneração. A redução do número de trabalhadores rurais é explicada como resultado de preguiça individual ou irresponsabilidade governamental. Utilizando-se desses discursos para posicionarem-se publicamente com relação a questões ligadas à agricultura, oradores atribuem responsabilidades e status moral aos agentes. Ao construir identidades rurais, estes discursos morais enfatizam o valor simbólico da agricultura de subsistência enquanto seu valor econômico declina.

Keywords

semi-subsistence agriculturemoral discoursediscourseidentity constructionNortheast Brazilagricultura de semi-subsistenciadiscursos moralesdiscursosconstrucción de identidadnoreste de Brasilagricultura de semi-subsistênciadiscursos moraisdiscursosconstrução da identidadenordeste brasileiro
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , November 2015 , pp. 781 - 809
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schneider, Sergio and Niederle, Paulo André, ‘Resistance Strategies and Diversification of Rural Livelihoods: The Construction of Autonomy among Brazilian Family Farmers’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 37: 2 (2010), pp. 379–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar; van der Ploeg, Jan Douwe, ‘The Peasantries of the Twenty-first Century: The Commoditisation Debated Revisited’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 37: 1 (2010), pp. 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Elizabeth Fitting, The Struggle for Maize: Campesinos, Workers, and Transgenic Corn in the Mexican Countryside (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011).

3 Niska, Miira, Vesala, Hannu and Vesala, Kari Mikko, ‘Peasantry and Entrepreneurship as Frames for Farming: Reflections on Farmers' Values and Agricultural Policy Discourses’, Sociologia Ruralis, 52: 4 (2012), pp. 453–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Mincyte, Diana, ‘Subsistence and Sustainability in Post-Industrial Europe: The Politics of Small-scale Farming in Europeanising Lithuania’, Sociologia Ruralis, 51: 2 (2011), pp. 101–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rogers, Susan Carol, ‘Good to Think: The “Peasant” in Contemporary France’, Anthropological Quarterly, 60: 2 (1987), pp. 56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Wolford, Wendy, ‘The Difference Ethnography Can Make: Understanding Mobilization and Development in the Brazilian Northeast’, Qualitative Sociology, 39: 3 (2006), p. 349Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., p. 350.

7 For comparative examples, see Ana Carolina Bordini Brabo Caridá, ‘Agricultura Camponesa X Agronegócio: distintos modelos de desenvolvimento rural e seus diferentes projetos socioeducacionais’, Revista IDeAS: Interfaces em Desenvolvimento, Agricultura e Sociedade, 6: 1 (2012), pp. 33–49Google Scholar; van der Ploeg, ‘The Peasantries of the Twenty-first Century’.

8 James Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1976); Teodor Shanin (ed.), Peasants and Peasant Society (Oxford: Blackwell, 1987).

9 Ferreira, Francisco and Lanjouw, Peter, ‘Rural Nonfarm Activities and Poverty in the Brazilian Northeast’, World Development, 29: 3 (2001), pp. 509–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Reardon, Thomas, Berdegué, Julio and Escobar, Germán, ‘Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Latin America: Overview and Policy Implications’, World Development, 29: 3 (2001), pp. 395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Rudi Colloredo-Mansfeld, Fighting Like a Community: Andean Civil Society in an Era of Indian Uprisings (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2009).

12 Adam Jaworski and Nikolas Coupland (eds.), The Discourse Reader (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 3, emphasis added.

13 Laura Ahearn, Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2012); Michael Bamberg, Anna De Fina and Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2007); Jaworski and Coupland, The Discourse Reader (1999).

14 Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977).

15 John Du Bois, ‘The Stance Triangle’, in Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2007), pp. 139–82.

16 Ibid., p. 141; Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2007), p. 6.

17 Pennesi, Karen, ‘Improving Forecast Communication: Linguistic and Cultural Considerations’, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88: 7 (2007), pp. 1033–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Making Forecasts Meaningful: Explanations of Problematic Predictions in Northeast Brazil’, Weather, Climate and Society, 3: 2 (2011), pp. 90–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pennesi, Karen and de Souza, Carla Renata, ‘O encontro anual dos profetas da chuva em Quixadá, Ceará: a circulação de discursos na invenção de uma tradição’, Horizontes Antropológicos, 38 (2012), pp. 159–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Susanne Friese, Qualitative Data Analysis with Atlas.ti (Los Angeles, CA: Sage, 2002).

19 Secretaria de Agricultura e Pecuária (SEAGRI), ‘II plano indicativo de desenvolvimento rural do Ceará 1999–2002: rumo ao desenvolvimento rural do Ceará’ (Fortaleza: Governo do Ceará, 2002).

20 Pereira, Anthony, ‘Brazil's Agrarian Reform: Democratic Innovation or Oligarchic Exclusion Redux?’, Latin American Politics and Society, 45: 2 (2003), pp. 41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Petras, James and Veltmeyer, Henry, ‘Whither Lula's Brazil?: Neoliberalism and “Third Way” Ideology’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 31: 1 (2003), pp. 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wolford, Wendy, ‘Agrarian Moral Economies and Neoliberalism in Brazil: Competing Worldviews and the State in the Struggle for Land’, Environment and Planning A, 37 (2005), pp. 241–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rural Poverty in Brazil. Available at http://www.ruralpovertyportal.org/web/guest/country/ home /tags/brazil, 2011.

22 Instituto de Pesquisa e Estratégia Econômica do Ceará (IPECE), Perfil Básico Municipal 2011: Quixadá, available at http://www.ipece.ce.gov.br/publicacoes/perfil_basico/pbm-2011/Quixada.pdf, 2011.

23 I was unable to obtain meaningful and consistent price data for corn, beans and rice produced in Ceará during the period 1994–2014 due to the change in currency and regional variation in commodity prices. I have therefore represented the farmers’ experience of price changes with a quote containing specific costs for typical commodities. See Averbug, André, ‘The Brazilian Economy in 1994–1999: From the Real Plan to Inflation Targets’, The World Economy, 25: 7 (2002), pp. 925–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for an explanation of the currency change with the Real Plan in the context of international trade liberalisation and subsequent inflation.

24 All names have been changed.

25 Anthony Pereira, ‘Brazil's Agrarian Reform’; Petras and Veltmeyer, ‘Whither Lula's Brazil?’; Schneider and Niederle, ‘Resistance Strategies’.

26 Castree, Noel, ‘Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment 1: What “Neoliberalism” Is, and What Difference Nature Makes to It’, Geography Compass, 4: 12 (2010), pp. 1725–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

27 Food First, Institute for Food and Development Policy, ‘Agricultural Trade Liberalization and Brazil's Rural Poor: Consolidating Inequality’, available at http://www.foodfirst.org/en/node/267, 2003; Steward, Angela, ‘Nobody Farms Here Anymore: Livelihood Diversification in the Amazonian Community of Carvão, a Historical Perspective’, Agriculture and Human Values, 24: 1 (2007), pp. 75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Linda Seligmann, Peruvian Street Lives: Culture, Power and Economy among Market Women of Cuzco (Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2004), pp. 122.

29 Silva, Jose Graziano and Grossi, Mauro Eduardo Del, ‘Rural Nonfarm Employment and Incomes in Brazil: Patterns and Evolution’, World Development, 29: 3 (2001), pp. 443–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Fitting, The Struggle for Maize, p. 12.

31 Ibid., p. 197.

32 Ibid., p. 209.

33 Mary Bucholtz and Kira Hall, ‘Language and Identity’, in Alessandro Duranti (ed.), Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004), pp. 369–94.

34 Harvey Sacks, ‘On the Analyzability of Stories by Children’, in John Gumperz and Dell Hymes (eds.), Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972), pp. 325–45.

35 Anssi Peräkylä and Johnanna Ruusuvuori, ‘Analyzing Talk and Text’, in Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2011), p. 533.

36 The concept of moral versions in narratives is introduced in Eleni Petraki, Carolyn Baker and Michael Emmison, ‘“Moral Versions” of Motherhood and Daughterhood in Greek-Australian Family Narratives’, in Michael Bamberg, Anna De Fina and Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse (Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2007), pp. 107–32.

37 Karen Pennesi, ‘The Predicament of Prediction: Rain Prophets and Meteorologists in Northeast Brazil’, unpubl. PhD diss., University of Arizona, 2007; Karla Patrícia Holanda Martins (ed.), Profetas da chuva (Fortaleza: Tempo d'Imagem, 2006), p. 226; Renzo Taddei, ‘Of Clouds and Streams, Prophets and Profits: The Political Semiotics of Climate and Water in the Brazilian Northeast’, Unpubl. PhD diss., Columbia University, 2005.

38 Rain prophets have gained the attention of scholars and the media as representatives of traditional Northeastern culture, which is grounded in an agrarian identity. See Martins (ed.), Profetas da chuva (2006); Abelardo Montenegro, Ceará e o profeta de chuva (Fortaleza: Edições UFC, 2008). The role of rain prophets has become increasingly folklorised. See Pennesi and de Souza, ‘O encontro anual’; Renzo Taddei, ‘Oráculos da chuva em tempos modernos: mídia, desenvolvimento econômico e as transformações na identidade social dos profetas do sertão’, in Martins (ed.), Profetas da chuva, pp. 161–70. This can be understood in part as a response to the decreasing utility of predictions as technical guides to agricultural production.

39 Pennesi, ‘Improving Forecast Communication’; Pennesi, ‘Making Forecasts Meaningful’.

40 The state government distributes free drought-resistant seeds to small producers each year. The timing of the distribution is linked to expectations of sufficient rainfall to ensure the seedlings survive; however, farmers often complain that seeds are distributed too late.

41 Scott, The Moral Economy of the Peasant.

42 While I focus on the discourse which portrays unemployed youth as immoral and unmotivated, not all older people express these beliefs. Moreover, many young people are employed and some are enthusiastic about farming. This discourse is, however, a prominent one when discussing work and one which several older adults employed in interviews.

43 Mayblin, Maya, ‘Learning Courage: Child Labour as Moral Practice in Northeast Brazil’, Ethnos, 75 (2010), p. 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Ibid., p. 40.

45 The ideals of ‘trabalho’ and ‘coragem’ are pervasive in Brazilian agricultural discourse. For example, the moral distinction between the hard-working and the ‘lazy’ is also discussed by Hoelle, Jeffrey, ‘Black Hats and Smooth Hands: Elite Status, Environmentalism, and Work among the Ranchers of Acre, Brazil’, Anthropology of Work Review, 33: 2 (2012), pp. 60–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar. He cites biblical understandings and developmentalist policies as the basis for the idea that ‘work’ consists in transforming the land through physical labour.

46 James Petras and Henry Veltmeyer, ‘Whither Lula's Brazil?’

47 Joanne Scheibman, ‘Subjective and Intersubjective Uses of Generalizations in English Conversations', in Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse, pp. 111–38.

48 Petraki et al., ‘“Moral Versions” of Motherhood’ (2007).

49 Steward, ‘Nobody Farms Here Anymore’.

50 Ibid., p. 87.

51 Nelson, Donald and Finan, Timothy, ‘The Emergence of a Climate Anthropology in Northeast Brazil’, Practicing Anthropology, 22 (2000), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Ibid.

53 For a discussion of the peasantry's struggle for autonomy, see van der Ploeg, ‘The Peasantries of the Twenty-first Century’; Schneider and Niederle, ‘Resistance Strategies’.

54 Rogers, Susan Carol, ‘Good to Think: The “Peasant” in Contemporary France’, Anthropological Quarterly, 60: 2 (1987), pp. 56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar.