Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:24:52.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Coastal Elite and Peruvian Politics, 1895–1919*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Rory Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For the foreign scholar, especially, an understanding of Peruvian politics between 1895 and 1919, the period of the so-called Repôblica Aristocràtica, is difficult to obtain. This quarter-century is considered an era of rapid social and economic change: in the words of one scholar, it completed ‘the disappearance of colonial Peru’. An important element in this transition was the growth on the coast of the ruling group connected with the expanding export economy, known in the literature variously as the ‘oligarchy’, ‘bourgeoisie’, or the ‘plutocracy’, which supposedly obtained control over the meagre resources of the state and directed them to its own ends.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , May 1982 , pp. 97 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jesús, Chavarría, ‘La desaparición del Perú colonial, 1870–1919’, Aportes 23 (01 1972), pp. 121–53.Google Scholar

2 ‘Oligarchy’ used to be the common term, but some authors, as will be clear from later citations, have recently preferred others. References to their work in this paper have tried to respect their preferred terminology.

3 In particular Fredrick, B. Pike, The Modern History of Peru (London, 1967),Google Scholar and David, P. Werlich, Peru: a short history (Carbondale, Illinois, 1978).Google Scholar

4 Shane, J. Hunt, ‘Distribution, growth, and government economic behaviour in Peru’ in Gustav, Ranis (ed.), Government and Economic Development (New Haven and London, 1971), p. 381.Google Scholar

5 See, for example, on this period Julio, Cotler, Clases, estado, y nación en ci Perú (Lima, 1978);Google ScholarDennis, L. Gilbert, ‘The Oligarchy and the Old Regime in Peru’ (Ph.D. thesis, Cornell U., 1977);Google ScholarWilliam, Bollinger, ‘The Bourgeois Revolution in Peru: a conception of Peruvian history’, Latin American Perspectives 4, No. 3 (1977), pp. 18–56;Google ScholarSinesio, López J., ‘El estado oligárquico en el Perú: un ensayo de interpretación’, Revista Mexicana de Sociologia 40, No. 3 (1978), pp. 991–1007;Google ScholarManuel, Burga and Alberto, Flores Galindo, Apogeo y crisis de la república aristocràtica (Lima, 1979);Google ScholarErnesto, Yepes, ‘Burguesía y gamonalismo en el Perú’, Análisis 7, (01–04 1979), pp. 31–66.Google Scholar

6 Cotler, , Clases, estado, y nación, p. 128.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. 185.

8 Burga, and Flores, Galindo, Apogeo y crisis, pp. 87–99 and 130. Their argument is very much more subtle than represented here.Google Scholar

9 Laura, Madalengoitia U., ‘El estado oligárquico y la transición hacia una nueva forma de estado en el Perú’, in Enrique, Bernales B et al. ., Burguesía y estado liberal (Lima, 1979), pp. 280–1 and 285–6.Google Scholar

10 Ernesto, Yepes, ‘El desarrollo peruano en las primeras décadas del siglo XX’, in Lumbreras, L. G. et al. , Nueva historia general del Perú (Lima, 1979), pp. 150–1.Google Scholar

11 Steve, Stein, Populism in Peru: the emergence of the masses and the politics of social control (Madison, Wisconsin, 1980), p. 48.Google Scholar

12 Gilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, pp. 56–8;Google ScholarJorge, Basadre, Historia de la República del Perú (5th edition, Lima, 1963), pp. 4732–4.Google Scholar

13 Gilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, pp. 76–9.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., pp. 39–53. These criticisms should not detract from the value of Gilbert's thesis for the analysis of twentieth-century Peru.Google Scholar

15 On the economic changes of the period, see Rosemary, Thorp and Geoffrey, Bertram, Peru, 1890–1977: growth and policy in an open economy (London, 1978), Part II.Google Scholar

16 Gilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar

17 Jorge, Basadre, La vida y la historia: ensayos sobre personas, lugares, y problenas (Lima, 1975), pp. 124–5.Google Scholar

18 Jorge, Basadre, Elecciones y centralismo en el Perú (apuntes para an esquema histórico) (Lima, 1980), pp. 15–16 and 56.Google Scholar Biographical information on such figures can be found in Juan, Pedro Paz Soldán, Diccionario biogréfico de peruanos contemporéneos (Lima, 1921),Google ScholarNeptalí, Benvenutto, Parlamentarios del Perú conternporáneo, 1904–1924 (3 vols., Lima, 1921–24),Google Scholar and William, Belmont Parker, Peruvians of Today (Lima, 1919).Google Scholar

19 Cotler, , Clases, estado, y nación, p. 130.Google Scholar

20 Pablo, Macera, Trabajos de Historia (4 vols., Lima, 1977), IV, 426.Google Scholar

21 Howard, L. Karno, ‘Augusto B. Leguía: the oligarchy and the modernisation of Peru, 1870–1930’ (Ph.D. thesis, UCLA, 1970), pp. 66–9;Google ScholarGilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, p. 55.Google Scholar

22 Burga, and Flores, Galindo, Apogeo y crisis, pp. 90–2;Google ScholarCarlos, Malpica, Los dueños del Perú (9th edition, Lima, 1976), pp. 90–1 and 119–20;Google ScholarJosé, Carlos Martín, José Pardo y Barreda: el estadista (Lima, 1948), p. 21.Google Scholar

23 On Payán, see Carlos, Camprubí Alcázar, José Payán y de Reyna (1844–1919): su trayectoria peruana (Lima, 1967); on the Aspíllagas and Miró Quesadas, Gilbert, ‘The Oligarchy’, chapters 3 and 5.Google Scholar

24 The question of oligarchic ideologies and mentalities has recently been raised by López, , ‘El estado oligrquico’, and interestingly developed by Burga, and Flores, Galindo, Apogeo y crisis, especially pp. 87–99.Google Scholar

25 Jorge, Basadre, ‘Para la historia de los parddos: el desplazamiento de los demócratas por el civilismo’, Documenta 4, (1965), pp. 297–300.Google Scholar This argument is repeated in Elecciones y centralismo, pp. 61–6.Google Scholar

26 Pedro, Dávalos y Lissón, Diez años de historia conternporánea del Perú, 1899–1908 (Lima, 1930), pp. 88–122.Google Scholar

27 Martin, , José Pardo, pp. 35–6;Google ScholarPeter, Blanchard, ‘A Populist Precursor: Guillermo Billinghurst’, Journal of Latin American Studies, Vol. 9, Part 2 (1977), pp. 251–73.Google Scholar

28 Basadre, , Historia, p. 3799.Google Scholar

29 Antero Aspílaga had a meeting with José Pardo in February 1918 at which he was asked to undertake the regeneration of the party with the ultimate prospect of running for president: Antero, Aspíllaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 25 02 1928,Google Scholar Vol. 244, Cayaltí, archive, Archivo del Fuero Agrario, Lima; El Comercio, 16 03 1918, a;Google ScholarMcMillin, to Secretary of State, 20 11 1918, U.S. State Department file 823.00'239;Google ScholarVíctor, Andrés Belatúnde, Planteamiento del problema nacional: memorias, tercera parte (Lima, 1962), p. 134.Google Scholar

30 Benvenutto, , Parlamentarios del Perú, 3, 93.Google Scholar

31 Victor, Andrés Belande, Meditaciones peruanas (Lima, 1932), p. 113. The essay cited was written in 1917.Google Scholar

32 Carlos, Miró Quesada Laos, Radiografía de la política peruana (Lima, 1959), p. 67.Google Scholar

33 Gary, R. Garett, ‘The Oncenio of Augusto B. Leguía: middle sector government and leadership in Peru, 1919–1930’ (Ph.D. thesis, University of New Mexico, 1973), p. 40.Google Scholar

34 Alaine, M. Low, ‘The effect of foreign capital on Peruvian entrepreneurship’ (B.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, 1975), pp. 75–6.Google Scholar Sousa's alignment with Billing- hurst caused great problems for the Aspíllagas for he was also a landowner in the valley where Cayaltí was located: Ramón Aspíllaga to Antero Aspíllaga, 6 February 1914, Vol. 204, Cayaltí archive; Basadre, , Historia, p. 3765.Google Scholar

35 Ramón, Aspíllaga to Antero, Aspíllaga, 7 03 1914,Google Scholar Vol. 204, and Ramón, Aspíllaga to Antero, Aspíllaga, 7 03 1937, Vol. 234, Cayaltí archive;Google ScholarBenvenutto, , Parlamentarios del Perú, 1, 47–8.Google Scholar

36 Martín, , José Pardo, p. 15;Google ScholarBasadre, , Elecciones y centralismo, p. 130.Google Scholar

37 Manuel, González Prada, Figuras y figurones (Lima, 1969), pp. 100–1.Google Scholar

38 See, for example, the treatment of the Prados in Miró, Quesada, Radiografía, pp. 5, 27–8, 36, 94–5, 104.Google Scholar

39 Peter, F. Kiarén, Modernization, dislocation, and Aprismo: origins of the Peruvían Aprista Party, 1870–1932 (Austin, 1973), pp. 13–14, 16–20,Google Scholar discusses Larco's character and fortunes. On Larco's opposition to the Benavides regime, see Basadre, , Historia, p. 3765.Google Scholar

40 Leslie, Combs to Secretary of State, 1 08 1910, State Department, Decimal File 823.00/83.Google Scholar

41 Gilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, pp. 234–5;Google ScholarChavarría, , ‘La desaparición’, pp. 144–52; for the Aspíllagas' views on the political situation created by the fall of Billinghurst,Google Scholar see Ramén, Aspílaga to Antero, Aspíllaga, 5 02 1914, Vol. 204, Cayaltí archive. Despite their friendship with the Prados, there does not appear to be evidence in the Cayalti archive that the Aspíllagas had prior knowledge of the coup against Billinghurst. Antero Aspíllaga wrote four days before the coup that ‘the army will stay in its barracks’:Google ScholarAntero, Aspílaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 31 01 1914, vol. 205, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

42 Burga, and Flores, Galindo, Apogeo y crisis, p. 89.Google Scholar

43 Alberto, Flores Galindo et al. , ‘Oligarquía y capital comercial en el sur peruano, 1870–1930’, Debates en Sociología 3, (1978), p. 55.Google Scholar

44 Stephen, M. Gorman, ‘The State, Elite, and Export in Peru: toward an alternative reinterpretation of political change’, Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 3, (1979) pp. 410–11.Google Scholar

45 See Sociedad Nacional de Industrias, Los derechos de aduana y las industrias nacionales (Lima, 1900).Google Scholar On industry, see Thorp, and Bertram, , Peru, 1890–1977, pp. 112–28.Google Scholar

46 El Financista, 9/16 11 1915.Google Scholar

47 Antero, Aspíllaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 14 08 1914, Vol. 209, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

48 Cayaltí, to Lima, , II 09 1914, Vol. 215, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

49 El Financista, 23/30 01 1914.Google Scholar

50 Sociedad Nacional Agraria to Director of La Patria, 23 12 1915, SNA archive; La Agricultura, Vol. 1, No. 5, (10 1915), 78.Google Scholar

51 La Agricultura, Vol. 5, No. 59, (07 1920),Google Scholar II. La Agricultura had been making such complaints about the SNA for years: see Vol. 4, No. 40, (09 1978), 6, and Vol. 4, No. 41, (10 1918), 4.Google Scholar

52 Alfredo, Broggi to Amador, del Solar, 24 08 1918, SNA archive.Google Scholar

53 Antero, Aspíllaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 8 07 1914, Vol. 205, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

54 Aspíllaga, Hermanos to Henry, Kendall and Sons, 1 09 1915, Vol. K. 214, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

55 Antero, Aspíllaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 28 08 1917, Vol. 244, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

56 Legislatura, Ordinaria de 1915, Diario de los Debates de la H. Cámara de Diputados, pp. 350, 434, 458, 507.Google Scholar

57 West Coast Leader, 15 06 1918.Google Scholar

58 El Financista, 15 10 1917;Google ScholarKiarén, , Modernisation, Dislocation, and Aprismo, pp. 70–9.Google Scholar

59 3 a Legislatura Extraordinaria de 1917, Debates, Diputados, pp. 308–10.Google Scholar

60 See the list of directors in Ernesto, Yepes del Castillo, Perú, 1820–1920: un siglo de desarrollo capitalista (Lima, 1972), pp. 175–80.Google Scholar

61 Jorge, Basadre and Rómulo, A. Ferrero, Historia de la Cámara de Comercio de Lima (Lima, 1963), pp. 363–5.Google Scholar

62 Ibid., pp. 57–60, 77; Cámara, de Comercio de Lima, Memoria presentada por el Consejo de Administración‖, 1915 (Lima, 1915), pp. 10–11,Google Scholar and Memoria, 1916, pp. 12–14;Google ScholarBasadre, , Historia, p. 3878.Google Scholar

63 Macera, , Trabajos, 4, 325–7.Google Scholar

64 Camprubí, , José Payán, pp. 33–4.Google Scholar

65 Ibid., p. 37; Legislatura Ordinaria de 1897, Debates, Diputados, pp. 397–419, 431–44, 480–505.Google Scholar

66 Howard, H. Clay to Secretary of State, 28 01 1913, U.S. State Department Decimal File 823.51/56.Google Scholar

67 El Economista Peruano, 04/05 1975, p. 850.Google Scholar

68 Congreso Ordinario de 1914, Debates, , Diputados, pp. 39–40, 65–6, 72, 507–18, 570–82;Google ScholarAntero, Aspíllaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 13 08 1914, Vol. 209, Cayaltí archive;Google ScholarVictor, Aspíllaga to Ramón, Aspíllaga, 10 1914,Google Scholar Vol. 215, Cayaltí archive; Basadre, , Historia, pp. 3786–7.Google Scholar

69 Handley, to Secretary of State, 16 09 1914, 8 10 1914, 14 10 1914, U.S. State Departmental Decimal File 823.51/78, 81, 82.Google Scholar

70 It is interesting to note that the banks were not protected in 1931 when the Banco del Perú y Londres was allowed to fail.

71 See, amongst others, the comments of Cotler, Madalengoitia, and Flores Galindo above, all of whom mention either the exporters or sugar planters as the dominant group within the elite. Baltazar Caravedo Molinari also talks of a ‘system of government in which predominated the agro-exporters, British capital, and the landowners’. Clases, lucha política, y gobierno en el Perú, 1919–1930 (Lima, 1977), p. 39.Google Scholar

72 Ramón, Aspíllaga to Antero, Aspíllaga, 18 02 1914, Vol. 204, Cayaltí archive.Google Scholar

73 Quoted in William, Albert, An Essay on the Peruvian Sugar Industry, 1880–1920 (Norwich, 1976), p. 191a.Google Scholar

74 La Agricultura, Vol. 3, No. 34, (03 1918), p. 527.Google Scholar

75 Germán, Arenas, Algo de una vida (para después de mi muerte) (Lima, 1941), p. 18.Google Scholar

76 Ramón, Aspíllaga to Antero, Aspíllaga, 14 10 1913, 15 10 1913, 23 10 1913, 3 11 1913, 17 01 1914, 6 02 1914, 9 02 1914, 13 02 1914, 28 02 1914, 6 04 1914, Vol. 204, Cayaltí archive. Other plantations' papers in the Archivo Agrario, such as those of San Nicolás, Contain similar requests.Google Scholar

77 Gilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, p. 173.Google Scholar

78 See, for example, the cases cited in debates over the Código de Aguas in Congreso Ordinario de 1916, Debates, Senadores, pp. 18–68;Google ScholarEl Economista Peruano, 08 1917, p. 1128.Google Scholar

79 Abelardo, M. Gamarra, Algo del Perú y mucho de Pelagatos por El Tuñante (Lima, 1905), pp. 63–70. I am grateful to Julio Cotler for directing me to Gamarra's essays, one of the more entertaining ways of conducting historical research.Google Scholar

80 Abelardo, M. Gamarra, Partículos de costumbres de El Tuñante (Lima, 1910), pp. 58 and 140.Google Scholar

81 Ibid., pp. 18–45.

82 Manuel, Vicente Villarán, Páginas escogidas (Lima, 1962), pp. 88–9.Google Scholar

83 Pedro, Dávalos y Lissón, La primera centuria (4 vols., Lima, 1919–1926), I, 60–2. This feature intensified during the oncenio.Google Scholar

84 Dávalos, y Lissón, La primera centuria, p. 63.Google Scholar See also Villarán, , Páginas escogidas, pp. 66–9.Google Scholar

85 Dávalos y Lissón commented that one reason for this was the payment of Congressmen, La primera centuria, pp. 78-9.Google Scholar

86 Vincent, J. Tufano, ‘Politics, instability, and the rise of modern militarism in Peru’ (Ph.D. thesis, City University of New York, 1976), p. 98.Google Scholar

87 Dávalos, y Lissón, Diez años, p. 200.Google Scholar

88 Basadre, , Historia, pp. 3872–3.Google Scholar Leguía's reputation was built on his struggle as Minister of Finance to push a budget through Congress. See Dávalos, y Lissón, Diez años, pp. 98–9.Google Scholar

89 Blanchard, , ‘A Populist Precursor’, pp. 267–8.Google Scholar

90 José, Pardo, Perú: cuatro años de gobierno constitucional (New York, 1919), p. 73.Google Scholar This view is shared by several historians, amongst them Jorge, Basadre, Elecciones y centralismo, p. 100.Google Scholar

91 Congreso Ordinario de 1917, Debates, Congreso, p. 7.Google Scholar Proposals for such a reform dated back to 1912: Dávalos, y Lissón, La Primera Centuria, p. 49.Google Scholar

92 Belaúnde, , Meditaciones peruanas, pp. 118–20.Google Scholar

93 Gilbert, , ‘The Oligarchy’, pp. 54–5.Google Scholar

94 This analysis is based on Echegarray C., I. R., La Cámara de Diputados y los Constituyentes del Perú (Lima, 1965); Legislatura Ordinaria de 1915, Debates, Senadores, passim; Paz Soldán, Diccionario biográfico; Parker, Peruvians of Today;Google ScholarBenvenutto, , Parlamentarios del Perú.Google Scholar

95 Arenas, , Algo de una vida, p. 21;Google ScholarBasadre, , La Vida y la Historia, pp. 124–5.Google Scholar

96 Of the remaining 23, 15 were born in Lima.

97 There is scope for a large-scale computer analysis of members of Congress in Peru. Jorge Basadre appears to have been engaged in research along these lines at the time of his death: Elecciones y centralismo, pp. 122–4, 128–32.Google Scholar

98 Cotler, , Clases, estado, y nación, pp. 725–6.Google Scholar

99 Burga, and Flores, Galindo, Apogeo y crisis, pp. 104–12.Google Scholar

100 Yepes, , ‘Burguesía y gamonalismo’, pp. 56–61.Google Scholar

101 Jorge, Basadre, ‘Leyes electorales peruanas, 1890–1917: teoría y realidad’, Histórica, Vol. 1, No. 1 (1977), pp. 1–36. Similar material is to be found in Elecciones y centralismo, passim.Google Scholar

102 This paragraph is based both on Basadre, ‘Leyes electorales peruana’, and Villarán, , Páginas escogidas, pp. 297–205.Google Scholar See also Basadre, , Elecciones y centralismo, pp. 76–83, 101, 106.Google Scholar

103 Burga, and Flores Galindo, Apogeo y crisis, pp. 109–10 and 140–1;Google ScholarMichael, J. González, ‘Capitalist agriculture and labour contracting in northern Peru, 1880–1905’, JLAS, Vol. 12, (1980), p. 302.Google Scholar

104 Ia Legislatura Extraordinaria de 1917, Debates, Diputados, pp. 297–8, 460–1.Google Scholar

105 Legislatura Ordinaria de 1917, Debates, Diputados, pp. 370–1.Google Scholar

106 José, Tamayo Herrera, Historia social dcl Cuzco repúblicano (Lima, 1978), p. 93.Google Scholar

107 Nils, Jacobsen, ‘Desarrollo económico y relaciones de clase en el sur andino, 1780–1920: una réplica a Karen Spalding’, Análisis 5 (05–08 1978), pp. 69–70.Google Scholar

108 Dan, C. Hazen, ‘The Awakening of Puno: government policy and the Indian problem in southern Peru, 1900–1955’ (Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1974), p. 5.Google Scholar

109 Villarán, , Paginas escogidas, pp. 241–2.Google Scholar

110 Arenas, , Algo de una vida, pp. 20–8 and 70–5.Google Scholar

111 Basadre, , Historia, pp. 3806–77.Google Scholar

112 Carl, Herbold, ‘Developments in the Peruvian administrative system, 1919–39: modern and traditional qualities of government under authoritarian regimes’ (Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1973), p. 111.Google Scholar

113 Basadre, , Historia, pp. 3836–7.Google Scholar

114 Pardo, , Cuatro años, p. 72.Google Scholar

115 Rory, Miller, ‘British firms and the Peruvian government 1885–1930’, in Platt, D. C. M. (ed.), Business Imperialism, 1840–1930: an inquiry based on British experience in Latin America (Oxford, 1977), pp. 371–94.Google Scholar

116 Antero, Aspíllaga to Ramón, and Baldomero, Aspíllaga, 25 01 1915, Vol. 217, Caya1tí archive.Google Scholar

117 Basadre, , Elecciones y centralismo, p. 106;Google ScholarBasadre, , Historia, pp. 3843–17 and 3835.Google Scholar

118 José, Matías Manzanilla, ‘El poder legislativo en el Perú, Anales de la Universidad Mayor de San Marcos de Lima, Vol. 31 (1904), p. 9.Google Scholar