Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:02:06.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sugar and Social Change in Oriente, Cuba, 1898–1946

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Robert B. Hoernel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the first decades of the present century, in that area of eastern Cuba which lies beyond a boundary formed by the Rio Cabreras in the north and the Rio Jobabo in the south, a unique social transformation took place which is of particular interest and importance. More than simply a transition from the traditional to the modern, Oriente's society underwent revolutionary change as a result not only of foreign influence but also of foreign control and design calculated to produce both modernization and ‘Americanization’. As it became increasingly apparent that these twin objectives could not be easily accomplished, a third consideration, economic, advantage, quickly emerged and rose to a position of dominance. Capital accumulation and the profit motive catalyzed a process of change produced by the reaction of two dissimilar cultures: one comparatively inert and native, the other highly dynamic and foreign, to produce sugar and a mutated society. Perhaps all societies which were once heavily engaged in sugar culture have developed mutations in some sense of the word, but in Oriente's case the term is particularly apt.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Latin American Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , May 1976 , pp. 215 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 While the Cuban Liberating Army remained armed until late summer, 1899, the population's exhaustion, a lack of unity, and the awesome specter of U.S. military power severely reduced Cuba's ability to oppose U.S. interests. See Pérez, Louis A. Jr, ‘Supervision of a Protectorate: The U.S. and the Cuban Army, 1898–1908’. Hispanic American Historical Review, 52 (05, 1972), 250–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 This assessment of U.S. policy, as well as that which appears in the following paragraph, does not reflect official policy as articulated through public documents and speeches, but does reflect objectives and attitudes as demonstrated in the Root, Roosevelt, and Wood Papers as well as War Dept documents, and is supported by actual policy implementation. See Healy, David, The United States in Cuba, 1898–1902: Generals, Politicians and the Search for Policy (Madison, 1963).Google Scholar

3 Smith, Robert Freeman, ‘Cuba: Laboratory for Dollar Diplomacy’, The Historian, 28, No. 4 (09, 1966), 586–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar Also, Munro, D. G., Interoention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean, 1900–1921 (Princeton, N.J., 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Atkins, Edwin F., Sixty Years in Cuba (Cambridge, Mass., 1926).Google Scholar See also Fraginals, Manuel M., El Ingenio (Havana, 1964).Google Scholar

5 Especially a strong and propertied hacendado class and a tradition of paternalism which, while diminished, remained a powerful influence.Google Scholar

6 Thomas, Hugh, Cuba: The Pursuit of Freedom (New York, 1971), p. 540.Google Scholar

7 The development of Economic Societies in both cities supports this statement: the Havana Economic Society flourished and became the most active in the Americas, while the Santiago Society functioned for only five years. See Shafer, R. J., The Economic Societies in the Spanish World, 1763–1821 (Syracuse, N.Y., 1958), pp. 151–4.Google Scholar

8 U.S. Department of War, Census of Cuba: 1899 (Washington, D.C., 1899), pp. 76, 96.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., p. 148.

10 Ibid., p. 544.

11 Oriente: 21,550 farms to 26,889 rural married males. Matanzas: 4,083 farms to 12,500 rural married males.

12 146,605 non-whites, Table XI., Census of Cuba: 1899, p. 221.Google Scholar

13 192,000 acres in coffee; 180,000 acres in cane. Thomas, Hugh, Cuba, p. 129.Google Scholar

14 Díaz, J. Alvarez, Estudio Sobre Cuba (Miami, 1963), p. 128, and Census of Cuba: 1899, p. 540.Google Scholar

15 Thomas, Hugh, op. cit., p. 132.Google Scholar

16 While several of the leading members of the Junta Revolucionaria were themselves sugar planters (Céspedes and Figueredo), when the rebel government announced its support for abolition of slavery, traditionally conservative sugar planters in the east became active loyalists. Also, the rebels sought to abolish slavery through the destruction of the economy which maintained it. In October of 1869 Céspedes ordered ‘ the destruction of all the cane fields of the island’. Pirala, Antonio, Anales de la Guerra de Cuba, I (Madrid, 1898), 642;Google ScholarFoner, Philip S., A History of Cuba and its Relations With the United States (2 vols., New York, 1963), 1, 194.Google Scholar

17 Corporate structure was foreign to Spanish law. The new commercial entity became known as the companía anónima. See Ireland, Gordon, ‘Observations Upon the Status of Corporations in Cuba Since 1898’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 76 (1927), 43–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Thomas, Hugh, op. cit., Appendix XIII, p. 1562.Google Scholar

19 Ely, Roland T., Cuando Reinaba su Majestad Azúcar (Buenos Aires, 1963), for 1864; 1899 figure computed from Census of Cuba, 1899, Table XLIX.Google Scholar

20 Department of Agriculture, Province of Santiago de Cuba, ‘Report’, Table no. 47, in U.S. War Dept., Civil Report of General Leonard Wood, 1901, V, 99.Google Scholar

21 Census of Cuba, 1899, Table XLIX, p. 560.Google Scholar

22 Censo de la República de Cuba: 1907, Table, p. 46.Google Scholar

23 10,000 caballerías owned by Cuban-American's Chaparra-Delicias complex.Google Scholar

24 21,550 farms; average size of 82 acres. Census of Cuba, 1899, p. 543.Google Scholar

25 Census of Cuba, 1899, Table XLV, p. 556.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., Table XLVI, p. 557.

27 Ibid., Table XLVI, p. 557.

28 Ibid., Table XLIV, p. 553.

29 See Corbitt, Duvon, ‘Mercedes and Realcngos’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 19 (1939), 262–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

30 Díaz, J. Alvarez, Estudio Sobre Cuba, pp. 119–20.Google Scholar

31 Gallenga, Antonio, The Pearl of the Antilles (London, 1873), p. 53.Google Scholar

32 Corbitt, Duvon, op. cit., p. 281.Google Scholar

33 U.S. War Dept., Civil Report of General Wood: 1902, Vol. 1, pt. 2, p. 22.Google Scholar

34 Jenks, Leland, Our Cuban Colony (New York, 1928), p. 142.Google Scholar

35 Thomas, Hugh, Cuba, p. 471.Google Scholar

36 Cuba Review (Nov., 1905),Google Scholar quoted by Jenks, op. cit., p. 155,Google Scholar and by Thomas, op. cit., p. 600.Google Scholar

37 Wright, Irene, Cuba (New York, 1912), pp. 420–60.Google Scholar

38 Ladd, E. F., ‘Report of the Treasurer of the Isle of Cuba’ in Civil Report of General Wood: 1900, Vol. 5, p. 13B.Google Scholar

39 Civil Order No. 254, Articles VII and VIII, 28 June, 1900.

40 In 1899, he suggested that the capital of Cuba be moved there. New York Times, editorial, Sept. 1899, p. 20.Google Scholar

41 Vaughan, W., The Life and Work of Sir William Van Horne (New York, 1920), p. 281.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., p. 117.

43 Ibid., p. 287.

44 Other stockholders included such notables as William and Henry Whitney, Jacob Schiff, Lanman Bull, August Belmont, E. H. Harriman, Grenville Dodge, and J. J. Hill. See Thomas, Hugh, Cuba, pp. 463–6Google Scholar and Foner, Philip, The Spanish-Cuban-American War and the Birth of U.S. Imperialism, 2, 471–3 for further details.Google Scholar

45 Crampton, Charles, ‘Sugar and the New Colonies’, The Forum, 32 (11, 1901), 291.Google Scholar

46 Department of Agriculture, Commerce, and Industries; Province of Santiago de Cuba, Report for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1901, Table 47, p. 99.Google Scholar

47 Comparison of data cited, Ibid., and República de Cuba, Oriente, Provincia de, Memoria del Gobierno y Consejo l'rovincial, Ano de 1904–1905 (Havana, 1906), Table, pp. 204–5. One sack equals 325 pounds.Google Scholar

48 Jenks, Leland, Our Cuban Colony, p. 130;Google ScholarThomas, Hugh, op. cit., p. 467.Google Scholar

49 Foner, Philip, The Spanish-Cuban-American War, 2, 477.Google Scholar

50 U.S. Tariff Commission, Effects of the Cuban Reciprocity Treaty (Washington, 1929), p. 3.Google Scholar

51 Mines controlled 12,708 ha. in 1904 (Memoria, Ano de 1904–5), 21,458 ha. in 1915 and 176,745 ha. in 1919Google Scholar . Villarreal, Juan Jérez, Oriente: Biografía de una Provincia (Havana, 1960), p. 308.Google Scholar

52 1894 production: 111, 273 tons, Clark, W. J., Commercial Cuba (New York, 1898), p. 397. 1907 crop: 256,598 tons, Censo de Cuba 1907, p. 46.Google Scholar

53 Comparison of data in Census of 1899, p. 543 and data in República de Cuba, Provincia de Oriente, Memoria, Table, p. 167.Google Scholar

54 Villarreal, J. Jérez, Oriente, p. 307 (no reference notes).Google Scholar

55 Ibid., pp. 307–8.

56 ‘Report of the Inspector of Oriente’, Census of 1919, p. 950.Google Scholar

57 Thomas, Hugh takes this position, based largely on Montejo's autobiography. Cuba, p. 516.Google Scholar

58 2,513 or 11.2% of all Oriente farm managers, Census of 1899.Google Scholar

59 Ibid., p. 69.

60 Arango's estimate: compared with 32,000 slaves. Census of 1919, p. 267. This has population figures for the entire nineteenth century.Google Scholar

61 Black illiteracy was double that of whites. Census of 1899.Google Scholar

62 Jenks, Leland, op. cit., p. 114.Google Scholar

63 Ibid., p. 115.

64 How the rebels got this misguided impression is a matter for speculation. There exists a possibility of conspiracy involving Gómez liberals, sugar interests, and perhaps representatives of the U.S. government, which had as its purpose to destroy forever Afro-Cuban political cohesion, and thereby reduce the danger of open West Indian immigration. President Gómez was accused of cncouraging the rebels (Thomas, Cuba, p. 522) and Senator Nelson introduced a resolution aimed at ascertaining whether persons or corporations were engaged in fomenting insurrection in Cuba (8 June 1912). For the only treatment of the Esteñoz Revolt, see Rafael Fermoselle, Politica y Color en Cuba; La Guerrita de 1912 (Montevideo, 1974).Google Scholar

65 Villarreal, Juan Jérez, op. cit., p. 306.Google Scholar

66 Thomas, Hugh, op. cit., p. 524.Google Scholar

67 U.S. Tariff Commission, Effects of the Cuban Reciprocity Treaty (Washington, 1929), p. 3.Google Scholar

68 British Department of Overseas Trade, Report on the Economic Conditions in Cuba (London, 1923), p. 5.Google Scholar

69 ‘Report of the Inspector of Oriente’, Census of 1919, p. 949.Google Scholar

70 Computed on the basis of yield per acre; production figures from Census of 1919; one arroba equals 25.35 pounds.Google Scholar

71 U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Production of Sugar in the U.S. and Foreign Countries, Bull. No. 473 (12 Feb. 1917), p. 20.Google Scholar

72 Casuso, Teresa, Cuba and Castro (New York, 1961), P. 9.Google Scholar

73 Farr's Manual of Sugar Companies, under American Sugar Refining Company.Google Scholar

74 Nelson, Lowery, Rural Cuba (Minneapolis, 1950), p. 97.Google Scholar

75 Thomas, Hugh, op. cit., p. 524.Google Scholar

76 Corbitt, Duvon C., ‘Immigration in Cuba’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 22 (1942), 306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

77 Estudio Sobre Cuba, cuadro 120.Google Scholar

78 Corbitt, Duvon C., loc. cit., p. 307.Google Scholar

79 Villarreal, Juan Jérez, op. cit., pp. 314–15.Google Scholar

80 Approximately 11,000 more Jamaican laborers left Cuba than arrived between 1920 and 1924. Proudfoot, M. J., Population Movements in the Caribbean (Port of Spain, 1950), p. 77.Google Scholar The 1924 estimate is from Carlos Manuel de Céspedes to British Chargé d'Affairs, 4 July 1924, reproduced in Great Britain, Foreign Office, Further Correspondence between H.M. 's Government and the Government of Cuba Respecting the Ill-Treatment of British West Indian Labourers in Cuba, Cmd. 2158 (London, 1924), p. 37.Google Scholar

81 Neville, H. O., ‘News of the Cuban Sugar Industry’, Facts About Sugar, 5 (15 09 1917), 209.Google Scholar

82 Neville, H. O., in Facts About Sugar (27 Oct. 1917), p. 329.Google Scholar

83 60.6%; Cuban increase 33% per decade; compare with U.S. increase of 21% per decade. Census of 1919.Google Scholar

84 See Further Correspondence, Cmd. 2158, cited in footnote 79.Google Scholar

85 Census of 1919, Table 25, p. 694. 60% of the population was under 20 and total males over 21 equal 169,390. All occupational data from Census of 1919, Table 25, pp. 694–5.Google Scholar

86 See Secretaría de Hacienda, Estadística General, Movimiento de Población for the years 1917–1920.Google Scholar

87 Villarreal, Juan Jérez, op. cit., p. 314.Google Scholar

68 Census of 1919, p. 437.Google Scholar

89 In 1924 white birth rate was 30.4 and death rate was 16.7. Black birth rate was 17.9 and death rate was 19.6. Computed from vital statistics for Oriente in Movimiento de Población — Año 1924.Google Scholar

90 29.3% urban in 1907, 29.5% urban in 1919. Census of 1919. The Census defines ‘urban’ as the percentage of the population living in towns of more than 1,000 inhabitants.Google Scholar

91 Census of 1899, p. 531.Google Scholar

92 ‘Food Supply Problem in Cuba’, Facts About Sugar, VI (22 Jan. 1918), 22.Google Scholar

93 Wright, Irene, Cuba, p. 483.Google Scholar

94 A price of 51/2c was enough to stimulate the island to ‘extreme prosperity’. Thomas, Hugh,op. cit., p. 543.Google Scholar

95 Buell, Raymond L., ed., Problems of the New Cuba (New York, Foreign Policy Association, Commission on Cuban Affairs, 1935), p. 268.Google Scholar

96 Wallich, H. C., Monetary Problems in an Export Economy: The Cuban Experience, 1914–1947 (Cambridge, Mass., 1950), p. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

97 Wright, Philip, The Cuban Situation and Our Treaty Relations (Washington, D.C., 1931), p. 97.Google Scholar

98 Jenks, Leland H., op. cit., p. 154.Google Scholar

99 177,061.8 caballerías according to Jérez, op. cit., p. 307. Percentage of total area based upon a provincial area of 36,602 km.2Google Scholar

100 U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, ‘Production of Sugar in the U.S. and Foreign Countries’, Bulletin No. 473, p. 20.Google Scholar

101 Lynsky, Myer, ed., Sugar Economics, Statistics and Documents (New York, U.S. Cane Sugar Refiners Association, 1938). 75% of the crop of 1937, para. No. 58.Google Scholar

102 Thomas, Hugh, op. cit., p. 540.Google Scholar

103 Sugar Reference Book and Directory. 1937, p. 97.Google Scholar

104 Only 18,000 acres under cultivation in 1948. Farr's Manual of Sugar Companies (1948), under Manatí Sugar Co.Google Scholar

105 3,515 colonos in Oriente in 1939, 800 of whom were free; 11,504 colonos in Villas, Las, of whom 4,747 were free. Censo de 1943, pp. 270–5.Google Scholar

106 U.S. Cane Sugar Refiners Ass., op. cit., paragraph No. 58.Google Scholar

107 Neville, H. O., ‘News of thc Cuban Sugar Industry’ Facts About Sugar (2 Feb. 1918), p. 89.Google Scholar

108 By the end of 1920 it had fallen to 2c and less. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Foreign and Domestic Markets, ‘U.S. Trade With Latin America’, Trade and Economic Review (Washington, 1921), p. 49.Google Scholar

109 Thomas, Hugh, op. cit., p. 545.Google Scholar

110 Todd, Frederick, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, ‘Cuban Readjustment to Current Economic Forces’, Trade Information Bulletin No. 725 (Washington, 1935), p. 1.Google Scholar

111 Ibid., p. 2.

112 Ibid., p. 5.

113 Ibid., p. 17.

114 Ibid., p. 4.

115 Cuban-American Sugar Co., Annual Report — 1924.Google Scholar

116 U.S. Cane Sugar Refiner's Assoc., op. cit., Table 64.Google Scholar

117 Ibid., Table 62.

118 Total length of Oriente's highway system in 1925 was 327,874 kms compared to 605,475 kms in tiny Pinar del Rio. Secretaría de Obras Públicas, Cuba y sus Cormunicaciones (Havana, 1925), p. 166.Google Scholar

119 British Department of Overseas Trade, op. cit., p. 22.Google Scholar

120 Commission on Cuban Affairs, Problems of the New Cuba (Washington, 1935), p. 56.Google Scholar

121 Thomas, Hugh makes essentially the same point. Cuba, p. 1147.Google Scholar

122 In 1936 there were about 28,000; in 1942 almost 30,000; in 1950, 40,000; and by 1958 almost 68,000 Censo de 1943 and Thomas, Hugh, Cuba, p. 1145.Google Scholar

123 Censo de 1943, p. 265.Google Scholar

124 Republica de Cuba, Ministerio de Agricultura, Censo Agricola Nacional, 1946 (Havana, 1951), p. 70.Google Scholar

125 Censo Agrícola, 1946, Table 7, p. 386.Google Scholar

126 26 farms out of 46,826; Censo Agrícola, 1946, p. 386.Google Scholar

127 Computed from size of holdings listed in Censo de 1943 which reflect 1939 figures. Ramiro Guerra y Sanchez arrived at a figure of 26% which seems low in view of the data given by Villarreal, Jérez, op. cit., but might not reflect subsidiary holdings, Sugar and Society in the Caribbean (New Haven, 1964), p. 79.Google ScholarJiménez, A. Nuncz calculates the figure of 22.4% in the 1950s, Geografia de Cuba (Havana, 1961), p. 226, showing a considerable drop.Google Scholar

128 Censo Agricola, 1946, Table 45, p. 906.Google Scholar

129 All municipal figures from Ibid., p. 328.

130 Jiménez, A. Nunnez, Geografía de Cuba, p. 565.Google Scholar

131 Censo Agricola, 1946, pp. 407, 472.Google Scholar

132 Nelson, Lowry, Rural Cuba, p. 20.Google Scholar

133 364,403 workers (1943), 146,708 temporary agricultural workers (1946), Censo de 1943 p. 1130 and Censo Agricola, p. 458.Google Scholar

134 $1.53 during the 1942 zafra, Censo de 1943, p. 226.Google Scholar

135 Mintz, Sidney W., Foreword to Guerra y Sáchez, Sugar and Society in the Caribbean (1964 edition), p. xxxviii.Google Scholar

136 See AlRoy, Gil Carl, ‘The Peasantry in the Cuban Revolution’, in Bonachea, Rolando and Valdés, Nelson (eds.), Cuba in Revolution (Garden City, N.Y., 1972), pp. 3–17;Google Scholar also Thomas, Hugh, ‘Middle-Class Politics and the Cuban Revolution’, in Véliz, Claudio (ed.), The politics of Conformity in Latin America (New York, 1967), pp. 249–77.Google Scholar