Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:39:45.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vocal function following laser and conventional surgery of small malignant vocal fold tumours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Annerose Keilmann ,
Wolfgang Bergler ,
Martina Artzt  and
Karl Hörmann
Annerose Keilmann*
Affiliation:
Clinic for Communication Disorders, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
Wolfgang Bergler
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
Martina Artzt
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
Karl Hörmann
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
*
Address for correspondence: PD Dr. Annerose Keilmann, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Klinik für Kommunikationsstörungen, Langenbeckestr. 1, D-55101 Mainz, Germany. Fax: 0049 6131 17 6623
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the disecribed study, 26 patients after conventional, and 27 patients after laser cordectomy were examined six months or more after the operation. Videolarybogstroboscopy revealed that patients after laser cordectomy more often phonate on a purely glottic level (81 per cent) in comparison to patienbts after conventional cordectomy (19 per cent). Webs were more frequent and more extended after conventional cordectomy compared to endoscopic laser surgery. The maximal phonation time showed a very wide range with a mean value of 9 to 10 sec; there was no statistical difference between the groups of patients. Using yanagihara's classification of sonograms, a better voice quality was measured after laser cordectomy than conventional cordectomy. The patients' estimation of their voice quality did not correlate with objective parameters.

Keywords

Laryngeal neoplasmsCarcinoma, squamous cellSurgeryLaser surgeryVoice quality
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Issue 12 , December 1996 , pp. 1138 - 1141
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blakeslee, D., Vaughan, C. W., Shapshay, S. M., Simpson, G. T., Strong, M. S. (1984) Excisional biopsy in the selective management of Tl glottic cancer: a three-year follow-up study. Laryngoscope 94: 488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaugrund, S. M., Gould, W. J., Haji, T., Meltzer, J., Bloch, C., Baer, T. (1984) Voice analysis of the partially ablated larynx. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 93: 311–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cragle, S. P., Brandenburg, J. H. (1993) Laser cordectomy or radiotherapy: cure rates, communication and cost. Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 108: 648–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crockett, D. M., Reynolds, B. N. (1990) Laryngeal laser surgery. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 23: 49–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eckel, H. E., Thumfart, W. F. (1992) Laser surgery for treatment of larynx carcinomas: indications, techniques and preliminary results. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 101: 113–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elner, A., Fex, S. (1988) Carbon dioxide laser as primary treatment of glottic T1S and T1A tumours. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) (Suppl 449): 135–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirano, M, Hirade, Y., Kawasaki, H. (1985) Vocal function following carbon dioxide laser surgery for glottic carcinoma. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 94: 232–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Höfler, H., Bigenzahn, W. (1986) Die Stimmqualifat nach CO2-Laserchordektomie. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie (Stuttgart) 65: 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, J. A., Owen, J. R. (1977) Five hundred cancers of the larynx and the pyriform sinus. Results of treatment by radiation and surgery. Laryngoscope 87: 1288–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leeper, H. A., Heenemann, H., Reynolds, C. (1990) Vocal function following vertical hemilaryngectomy: a preliminary investigation. Journal of Otolaryngology 19: 62–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahlbeck, S., SchloBhauer, B. (1959) Phoniatrische Nachuntersuchungen chordektomierter Patienten. HNO 8: 201–205.Google Scholar
McGuirt, W. F., Blalock, D., Koufman, J. A., Fechs, R. S., Hilliard, A. J., Greven, K., Randall, M. (1994) Comparative voice results after laser resection or irradiation of Tl vocal cord carcinoma. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 120: 951–955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, E. N., Wagner, R. L., Johnston, J. T. (1994) Microlaryngoscopic surgery for Tl glottic lesions: a costeffective option. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 103: 28–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osoff, R. H., Matar, S. A. (1988) Advantages of laser treatment of tumors in the larynx. Oncology 2: 58–61.Google Scholar
Ott, S., Klingholz, F., Willich, N., Kastenbauer, E. (1992) Die Bestimmung der Qualität der Sprechstimme nach Therapie von Tl- und T2-Stimmlippenkarzinomen. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie (Stuttgart) 71: 236–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptok, M., de Maddalena, H. (1990) Subjektive und objektive Stimmevaluation nach Kehlkopfteilresektion. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie (Stuttgart) 69: 356–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riska, T. B., Lauerma, S. (1966) Die Stimmbandfunktion nach der Behandlung von Stimmbandkarzinomen im Stadium I. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) (Suppl 224): 501–514.Google Scholar
Rothfield, R. E., Johnson, J. T., Myers, E. N., Wagner, R. L. (1989) The role of hemilaryngectomy in the management of Tl vocal cord cancer. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 115: 677–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydell, R., Schalen, L., Fex, S., Elner, A. (1995) Voice evaluation before and after laser excision vs. radiotherapy of T1A glottic carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) 115: 560–565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schleier, E., Siegert, C., Klingholz, F. (1976) Funktionelle Ergebnisse nach Strahlentherapie und Chordektomie von Stimmlippenkarzinomen. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie (Stuttgart) 55: 464–469.Google Scholar
Spillmann, T., Grossenbacher, R., Schwarz, C. (1984) Eine Methode zur Beurteilung der Stimmfunktion nach Behandlung des Larynxkarzinomes. Aktuelle Probleme in der ORL 7: 245–252.Google Scholar
Strong, M. S., Jako, G. J. (1972) Laser surgery in the larynx: early clinical experience with continuous CO2 laser. Annals of Otology 81: 791–798.Google Scholar
Vigneau, D., Calvet, H., Pessey, J. J., Lacomme, Y. (1988) Laryngectomies reconstructives. Resultats carcinologiques et fonctionnels. Revue de Laryngologie 109: 145–147.Google Scholar
Young, J. R. (1983) Laser surgery for Tl glottic carcinoma – the argument against. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 97: 234–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendler, J., Seidner, W. (1977) Funktionelle Befunde nach erweiterter Chordektomie mit Schwenklappenplastik. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Jena aus der Mathematisch-NaturwissenschaftlichenFakultat 26: 142–144.Google Scholar
Wetmore, S. J., Key, J. M., Suen, J. Y. (1986) Laser therapy for Tl glottic carcinoma of the larynx. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 112: 853–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanagihara, N. (1967) Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. Journal of Speech and αHearing Research 10: 531–541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed