Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:12:19.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validity of tympanometry in cases of confirmed otosclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

C. Muchnik*
Affiliation:
School for Communication Disorders, Speech and Hearing, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
M. Hildesheimer
Affiliation:
School for Communication Disorders, Speech and Hearing, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
M. Rubinstein
Affiliation:
School for Communication Disorders, Speech and Hearing, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Y. Gleitman
Affiliation:
School for Communication Disorders, Speech and Hearing, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
*
Correspondence and reprint address: Chava Muchnik, Ph. D., School for Communication Disorders, Speech and Hearing, The Him Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer Hospital 52621, Israel.

Abstract

The otoadmittence or impedance measurements are common procedures in the diagnosis of middle ear pathologies. The present study was undertaken for the purpose of studying the clinical validity of static admittance values in 42 confirmed otosclerotic ears. For both 220 Hz and 660 Hz probe tones only one third of the otosclerotic ears had low admittance values, as expected. The remainder showed admittance values in the normal or high ranges. No significant correlation was found between air bone gap (ABG) and the admittance values.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberti, P. W. and Jerger, J. F. (1974) Probe-tone frequency and the diagnostic value of tympanometry. Archives of Otolaryngology, 99: 206210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bel, J., Causse, J. and Michaux, P. (1975) Paradoxical compliances in otosclerosis. Audiology, 14: 118129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browning, G. G., Swan, I. R. C. and Gatheouse, S. (1985) The doubtful value of tympanometry and the diagnosis of otosclerosis. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 99: 545547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dancer, J., Shiffman, F. and Hill, W. (1977) Tympanometry in otosclerosis. Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Monthly, 56(4): 177180.Google ScholarPubMed
Dieroff, H. G. (1978) Differenial diagnostic value of tympanometry in adhesive processes and otosclerosis. Audiology, 17: 7786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, A. S. (1974) Ear drum abnormality and the measurement of ear function. Archives of Otolaryngology, 99: 211217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Himmelfarb, M. Z., Lessing, J. and Shanon, E. (1977) Otoadmittance in normal subjects. Laryngoscope, 87: 11251129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerger, J., Anthony, L., Jerger, S. and Maudlin, L. (1974) Studies in impedance audiometry III. Middle ear disorders. Archives of Otolaryngology, 99: 165171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liden, G., Harford, E. and Hallen, O. (1974) Automatic tympanometry in clinical practice. Audiology, 13: 126139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiet, R. J. and Causse, J. B. (1982) Otosclerosis—the last four years. American Journal of Otology, 3: 249255.Google ScholarPubMed