Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:40:14.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation study of an ex vivo porcine auricular model for simulation training in otoplasty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2020

L Li ,
S Okhovat ,
T Milner  and
S Sheikh
L Li
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
S Okhovat*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
T Milner
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
S Sheikh
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Saleh Okhovat, Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, Scotland, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To perform a validation assessment of a novel porcine ex vivo model for otoplasty training.

Methods

A total of nine otolaryngology trainees performed a standard approach otoplasty on a porcine ear. They completed a series of tasks including posterior skin incision, anterior scoring, Mustardé suture placement and concha–mastoid suture placement. Trainees completed a post-task questionnaire assessing face validity, global content validity and task-specific content validity.

Results

Trainees’ median scores for the porcine model were: 4 for face validity (interquartile range, 3–4), 5 for global content validity (interquartile range, 4–5) and 4 for task-specific content validity (interquartile range, 4–4).

Conclusion

This study is the first to formally validate the ex vivo porcine auricular model as a useful tool for training in otoplasty. The model should be incorporated into simulation training for otoplasty in order to improve learning, enable acquisition of specific surgical skills and improve operative outcomes.

Keywords

External EarEar DiseasesSimulation TrainingEducational ModelsAnimals
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 134 , Issue 7 , July 2020 , pp. 597 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr S Okhovat takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Alexander, KS, Stott, DJ, Sivakumar, B, Kang, N. A morphometric study of the human ear. Br J Plast Surg 2011;64:41–7Google ScholarPubMed
Bradbury, ET, Hewison, J, Timmons, MJ. Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children. Br J Plast Surg 1992;45:97–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adamson, PA, Strecker, HD. Otoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg 1995;11:284–300Google ScholarPubMed
Mustardé, JC. The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;39:382–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnas, DW. Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;42:189–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chongchet, V. A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1963;16:268–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stenstroem, S. A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg 1963;32:509–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, JA. Surgical training and the European Working Time Directive: the role of informal workplace learning. Int J Surg 2010;8:179–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, G, Voigt, S, Rettinger, G. Computed tomography-based training model for otoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:2427–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loh, CYY, Gunn, E, Pennell, DJL, Athanassopoulos, T. Pinnaplasty: a porcine training model. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:868–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, TD, Okhovat, S, Clement, WA, Wynne, DM, Kunanandam, T. A systematic review of simulated laryngotracheal reconstruction animal models. Laryngoscope 2019;129:235–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
STROBE Statement. In: https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=available-checklists [8 June 2020]Google Scholar
ARRIVE guidelines. In: https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines [8 June 2020]Google Scholar
Limandjaja, GC, Breugem, CC, Mink van der Molen, AB, Kon, M. Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:19–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weerda, H. Disorders of the external ear. In: Clark, RW, ed. Paediatric Otolaryngology: Practical Clinical Management. Stuttgart: Thieme Publishers, 2017;56–77Google Scholar
Alberty, J, Filler, TJ, Schmal, F, Peuker, ET. Thiel method fixed cadaver ears. A new procedure for graduate and continuing education in middle ear surgery [in German]. HNO 2002;50:739–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar