Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:18:08.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The use of cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty

III: Audit of costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. P. Mills*
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.
J. M. Heaton
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.
I. G. Gray
Affiliation:
Departments of Anasthetics, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.
*
Mr R. P. Mills, Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY.

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a comparative audit of the costs of using artificial prostheses and cortical bone. The costs of using a bone graft have been calculated by estimating the expenses incurred as a result of the additional time required for preparation of the grafts. The mean cost of preparing a graft was £29.10, while the mean cost of using a prosthesis was £65.01.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Grote, J. J. (1986) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with hydroxylapatite implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 95 (Supplement 123): 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, R. P. (1993) The use of cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty. I: Surgical techniques and hearing results. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 686689CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nikolaou, A., Bourikas, Z., Maltos, V., Aidonis, A. (1992) Ossiculoplasty with use of autografts and synthetic prosthetic materials: a comparison of results in 165 cases. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 692694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, G. D. L. (1983) TORPs: how they have fared after five years? Journal of Laryngology and Otology 991993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar