Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:39:21.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transoral laser resection of glottic carcinoma: what is the significance of anterior commissure involvement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2017

K A Stephenson  and
J J Fagan
K A Stephenson
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
J J Fagan*
Affiliation:
Division of Otolaryngology, University of Cape Town, South Africa
*
Address for correspondence: Prof J J Fagan, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The optimal management of glottic carcinoma involving the anterior commissure is controversial.

Method:

A retrospective analysis was conducted of 76 patients with glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated by transoral carbon dioxide laser resection by a single surgeon.

Results:

Sixty-three patients (with tumour stage Tis–T3) were eligible for inclusion. Thirty patients had involvement of the anterior commissure; these patients were significantly more likely to have either uncertain or positive margins (63.3 vs 30.3 per cent, p = 0.012), and were also more likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (40 vs 3.2 per cent, p = 0.0005). The overall laryngeal preservation rate was 96.8 per cent; there was no statistically significant difference between those with and without anterior commissure involvement (96.7 and 96.9 per cent respectively).

Conclusion:

Transoral laser resection with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in a minority of patients with adverse pathological findings can be recommended for the primary treatment of anterior commissure glottic cancer from an oncological perspective; excellent local control and laryngeal preservation rates can be achieved.

Keywords

Laryngeal CancerAnterior Laryngeal CommissureLarynxLaserRadiotherapy
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 131 , Issue 2 , February 2017 , pp. 168 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the 50th Congress of the South African Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 18–21 October 2014, Cape Town, South Africa.

References

1 Krespi, YP, Meltzer, CJ. Laser surgery for vocal cord carcinoma involving the anterior commissure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:105–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Rucci, L, Gammarota, L, Borghi Cirri, MB. Carcinoma of the anterior commissure of the larynx: I. Embryological and anatomic considerations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:303–8Google ScholarPubMed
3 Rucci, L, Gammarota, L, Gallo, O. Carcinoma of the anterior commissure of the larynx: II. Proposal of a new staging system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:391–6Google Scholar
4 Kirchner, JA, Carter, D. Intralaryngeal barriers to the spread of cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 1987;103:503–13Google Scholar
5 Bradley, PJ, Mackenzie, K, Wight, R, Pracy, P, Paleri, V; ENT-UK Head & Neck Group. Consensus statement on management in the UK: transoral laser assisted microsurgical resection of early glottic cancer. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:367–73Google Scholar
6 Mizrachi, A, Rabinovics, N, Hilly, O, Shvero, J. Analysis of failure following transoral laser surgery for early glottic cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:2247–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Pham, TA, De Freitas, R, Sigston, E, Vallance, N. Factors leading to the use of alternate treatment modalities following transoral laser excision of T1 and T2 glottic squamous cell carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 2012;82:720–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Chone, CT, Yonehara, E, Martins, JE, Altemani, A, Crespo, AN. Importance of anterior commissure in recurrence of early glottic cancer after laser endoscopic resection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:882–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Steiner, W, Ambrosch, P, Rödel, RM, Kron, M. Impact of anterior commissure involvement on local control of early glottic carcinoma treated by laser microresection. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1485–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Rödel, RM, Steiner, W, Müller, RM, Kron, M, Matthias, C. Endoscopic laser surgery of early glottic cancer: involvement of the anterior commissure. Head Neck 2009;31:583–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Crespo, AN, Chone, CT, Gripp, FM, Spina, AL, Altemani, A. Role of margin status in recurrence after CO2 laser endoscopic resection of early glottic cancer. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:306–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Ansarin, M, Santoro, L, Cattaneo, A, Massaro, MA, Calabrese, L, Giugliano, G et al. Laser surgery for early glottic cancer: impact of margin status on local control and organ preservation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:385–90Google Scholar
13 Grant, DG, Bradley, PT, Parmar, A, Toll, EC, Baldwin, DL, Porter, GC et al. Implications of positive margins or incomplete excision in laryngeal cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery: how we do it. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:479–92Google Scholar
14 Edge, SB, Byrd, DR, Compton, CC, Fritz, AG, Greene, FL, Trotti, A eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. New York: Springer, 2010;57–62 Google ScholarPubMed
15 Desloge, RB, Zeitels, SM. Endolaryngeal microsurgery at the anterior glottal commissure: controversies and observations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109:385–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Maheshwar, AA, Gaffney, CC. Radiotherapy for T1 glottic carcinoma: impact of anterior commissure involvement. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:298–301 Google Scholar
17 Tong, CC, Au, KH, Ngan, RK, Chow, SM, Cheung, FY, Fu, YT et al. Impact and relationship of anterior commissure and time-dose factor on the local control of T1N0 glottic cancer treated by 6 MV photons. Radiat Oncol 2011;6:53 Google Scholar
18 Reddy, SP, Hong, RL, Nagda, S, Emami, B. Effect of tumor bulk on local control and survival of patients with T1 glottic cancer: a 30-year experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;69:1389–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Hoffmann, C, Hans, S, Sadoughi, B, Brasnu, D. Identifying outcome predictors of transoral laser cordectomy for early glottic cancer. Head Neck 2016;38(suppl 1):E406–11Google Scholar
20 Lee, HS, Chun, BG, Kim, SW, Kim, ST, Oh, JH, Hong, JC et al. Transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer as one-stage single modality therapy. Laryngoscope 2013;123:2670–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Hakeem, AH, Tubachi, J, Pradhan, SA. Significance of anterior commissure involvement in early glottic squamous cell carcinoma treated with trans-oral CO2 laser microsurgery. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1912–17Google Scholar
22 Peretti, G, Piazza, C, Cocco, D, De Benedetto, L, Del Bon, F, Redaelli De Zinis, LO et al. Transoral CO(2) laser treatment for T(is)-T(3) glottic cancer: the University of Brescia experience on 595 patients. Head Neck 2010;32:977–83Google Scholar
23 Sachse, F, Stoll, W, Rudack, C. Evaluation of treatment results with regard to initial anterior commissure involvement in early glottic carcinoma treated by external partial surgery or transoral laser microresection. Head Neck 2009;31:531–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24 Kelly, MD, Hahn, SS, Spaulding, CA, Kersh, CR, Constable, WC, Cantrell, RW. Definitive radiotherapy in the management of stage I and II carcinomas of the glottis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:235–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Marshak, G, Brenner, B, Shvero, J, Shapira, J, Ophir, D, Hochman, I et al. Prognostic factors for local control of early glottic cancer: the Rabin Medical Center retrospective study on 207 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1999;43:1009–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 Blanch, JL, Vilaseca, I, Caballero, M, Moragas, M, Berenguer, J, Bernal-Sprekelsen, M. Outcome of transoral laser microsurgery for T2-T3 tumors growing in the laryngeal anterior commissure. Head Neck 2011;33:1252–9Google Scholar