Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:55:50.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Topical management of anterior epistaxis: a national survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

N Kara*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
C Spinou
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
Q Gardiner
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Naveed Kara, c/o Department of Otolaryngology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

The use of nasal creams and ointments in the conservative management of anterior epistaxis is well documented and supported. This study set out to obtain a national opinion, in order to establish current practice.

Design:

A survey of all Scotland-based otolaryngology clinicians was conducted. Participants were asked which topical treatment they used in their practice, how often and for how long they advocated its use, and how they advised their patients to apply it.

Results:

The overall response rate was 91 per cent. We discuss and compare the varying responses for the questions posed, and discuss the possible reasons for these in greater detail.

Conclusions:

This study demonstrates a high degree of variation in this practice, arising from a lack of concrete evidence and influenced by anecdotal experience and personal preferences. Definitive comparative studies are required if a ‘gold standard’ topical approach for the management of anterior epistaxis is to emerge.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Shaheen, OH. Epistaxis. In: Kerr, AG, Groves, J, eds. Scott Brown's Otolaryngology, 5th edn. London: Butterworths, 1987;4:272–82Google Scholar
2 Petruson, B. Epistaxis in childhood. Rhinology 1979;17:8390Google Scholar
3 Beran, M, Petruson, B. Occurrence of epistaxis in habitual nose-bleeders and analysis of some etiological factors. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1986;48:297303Google Scholar
4 Josephson, GD, Godley, FA, Stierna, P. Practical management of epistaxis. Med Clin North Am 1991;75:1311–20Google Scholar
5 Kubba, H, MacAndie, C, Botma, M, Robinson, J, O'Donnell, M, Robertson, G et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial of antiseptic cream for recurrent epistaxis in childhood. Clin Otolaryngol 2001;24:228–31Google Scholar
6 Loughran, S, Spinou, E, Clement, WA, Cathcart, R, Kubba, H, Geddes, NK. A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial of petroleum jelly/Vaseline for recurrent paediatric epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:266–9Google Scholar
7 Badran, K, Jani, P. Novel approach to Naseptin® cream application using a rubber tip. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:243–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Burton, M, Doree, C. Interventions for recurrent idiopathic epistaxis (nosebleeds) in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(1):CD004461Google Scholar
9 Ruddy, J, Proops, DW, Pearman, K, Ruddy, H. Management of epistaxis in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1991;21:139–42Google Scholar
10 Murthy, P, Nilssen, ELK, Rao, S, McClymont, LG. A randomised clinical trial of antiseptic nasal carrier cream and silver nitrate cautery in the treatment of recurrent anterior epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol 1999;24:228–31Google Scholar
11 Leong, SCL. Return to basics with Naseptin®. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 British National Formulary Online. www.bnf.org.uk [March 2008]Google Scholar
13 Lack, G, Fox, D, Northstone, K, Golding, J. Factors associated with the development of peanut allergy in childhood. N Eng J Med 2003;348:977–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Donaldson, L. Chief Medical Officer's Update 36. London: Department of Health, 2003Google Scholar