Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T08:49:23.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sinonasal effects of external dacryocystorhinostomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2021

H Eyigor ,
E A Cetinkaya ,
D T Coban ,
G Ozturk  and
Ö Erdem
H Eyigor
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
E A Cetinkaya*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
D T Coban
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
G Ozturk
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
Ö Erdem
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Health Sciences Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Erdem Atalay Cetinkaya, KBB Klinigi, SBÜ Antalya Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi, Antalya, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +90 242 249 44 00
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

External dacryocystorhinostomy is thought to cause mucociliary dysfunction by damaging the mucosa, in turn affecting ciliary activity and mucus quality. This study investigated the effect of external dacryocystorhinostomy on sinonasal function.

Methods

Patients scheduled for unilateral external dacryocystorhinostomy who underwent endoscopic nasal examination and paranasal sinus computed tomography were included in this study. A saccharine test was performed on the planned surgical side and the mucociliary clearance time was determined. The sinonasal quality of life was measured in all patients, pre-operatively and at six months post-operatively, using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22. The Lund–Kennedy endoscopic score was also determined in all patients, both pre- and post-operatively.

Results

The study comprised 28 patients (22 females and 6 males). A statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and post-operative saccharine test results (p = 0.006), but not between the pre- and post-operative Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study is one of only a few to investigate the effect of external dacryocystorhinostomy on sinonasal function. The results showed that external dacryocystorhinostomy impairs mucociliary clearance. The surgical procedure is well tolerated and does not significantly change nasal symptom scores.

Keywords

DCRDacryocystorhinostomyNasolacrimal Duct
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 135 , Issue 9 , September 2021 , pp. 791 - 794
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr E A Cetinkaya takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Toti, A. New conservative method of radical treatment of chronic suppurations of the lacrimal sac [in Italian]. Clin Mod (Pisa) 1904;10:385–7Google Scholar
Cokkeser, Y, Evereklioglu, C, Er, H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:488–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unal, M, Oz, O, Adigüzel, U, Vayisoglu, Y, Vatansever, H, Görür, K. Mucociliary clearance after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:264–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okuyucu, S, Akoglu, E, Oksuz, H, Gorur, H, Dagli, S. The effect of dacryocystorhinostomy on mucociliary function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:585–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yigit, O, Kirgezen, T, Taskin, U, Yener, M. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy appears to impair nasal mucociliary clearance. Ear Nose Throat J 2011;90:E23–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hancı, D, Altun, H, Şahin, E, Altıntoprak, N, Cingi, C. Turkish translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22. ENT Updates 2015;5:51–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, VJ, Kennedy, DW. Staging for rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:35–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkiten, G, Kumral, TL, Saltürk, Z, Atar, Y, Yildirim, G, Uyar, Y et al. Effect of deviated nasal septum type on nasal mucociliary clearance, olfactory function, quality of life, and efficiency of nasal surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:1151–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeConde, AS, Mace, JC, Bodner, T, Hwang, PH, Rudmik, L, Soler, ZM et al. SNOT-22 quality of life domains differentially predict treatment modality selection in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:972–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miyake, MM, Gregorio, LL, Freitag, SK, Lefebvre, DR, Gray, ST, Holbrook, EH et al. Impact of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy on sinonasal quality of life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2016;30:189–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leong, SC, Macewen, CJ, White, OS. A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010;24:81–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayet, B, Racy, E, Assouline, M. Complications of standardized endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with unciformectomy. Ophthalmology 2004;111:837–45Google Scholar
Shams, PN, Selva, D. Acute post-operative rhinosinusitis following endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond) 2013;27:1130–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MJ, Park, J, Yang, MK, Choi, YJ, Kim, N, Choung, HK et al. Long-term results of maintenance of lacrimal silicone stent in patients with functional epiphora after external dacryocystorhinostomy. Eye (Lond) 2020;34:669–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saratziotis, A, Emanuelli, E, Gouveris, H, Tsironi, E, Fountas, K. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: long-term results in 91 procedures. Rhinology 2014;52:413–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Çukurova, I, Caner, MG, Cetinkaya, EA, Gümüsssoy, M, Söken, H. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: outcomes using mucosal flap preserving technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1661–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eyigör, H, Unsal, AI, Unsal, A. The role of accompanying sinonasal abnormalities in the outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Rhinol 2006;20:620–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed