Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:51:08.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Septoplasty and/or submucous resection?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

O. Fjermedal ,
C. Saunte  and
S. Pedersen
O. Fjermedal*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tromso, Norway.
C. Saunte
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tromso, Norway.
S. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Tromso, Norway.
*
Oddbjø Fjermedal, M.D., Department of Otorhinolaryngology, N-9012, University of Tromso, Norway.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Information obtained from the case-records and completed questionnaires from 478 patients operated in the 5-year-period 1980 through 1984 with either septoplasty or submucous resection (SMR), has been analysed on an average 31 months after surgery. Two hundred (42 per cent) underwent SMR and 278 (58 per cent) septoplasty. Twenty per cent presented for a clinical follow-up examination. Of the 478 patients, 63 per cent were satisfied. More patients were satisfied with the functional results after septoplasty, which also resulted in fewer and smaller perforations than SMR. Septoplasty ought to replace the latter as the routine procedure. 10 per cent had troublesome crusting independent of the technique used. Change in the external shape of the nose is a minor problem for the patients, and was not regarded as an indication for re-operation. Patients with allergic rhinitis may undergo septal surgery on general lines.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 102 , Issue 9 , September 1988 , pp. 796 - 798
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broms, P., Jonson, B. and Malm, L. (1982) Rhinomanometry. IV. A pre- and postoperative evaluation in functional septoplasty. Acta Otolaryngologica, 94: 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottle, M. H. (1960) Concepts of nasal physiology as related to corrective nasal surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology, 72: 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottle, M. H. and Loring, R. M. (1946) Corrective surgery of the external pyramid and the nasal septum for restoration of normal physiology. Illinois Medical Journal, 90: 119–131.Google ScholarPubMed
Dommerby, H., Rasmussen, O. R. and Rosborg, J. (1985) Long-term results of septoplastic operations. Journal for Oto-rhi-nolaryngology and its Borderlands, 47: 151–157.Google Scholar
Freer, O. T. (1902) The correction of deflections of the nasal septum with a minimum of traumatization. Journal of the American Medical Association, 4: 61–69.Google Scholar
Goldman, I. B. (1956) New techniques in the surgery of the deviated nasal septum. Archives of Otolaryngology, 64: 183–189.Google Scholar
Jessen, M. and Malm, L. (1984) Longterm follow-up of patients with nasal stuffiness and normal NAR. Acta Otolaryngologica, 214: 95–98.Google Scholar
Killian, G. (1904) Die submucöse Fensterreaktion der Nasen sche-idewand. Archives für Laryngologie und Rhinologie, 16: 362–287.Google Scholar
Peacock, M. R. (1981) Sub-mucous resection of the nasal septum. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 95: 341–356.Google Scholar
Sloth, M. and Kølendorf, L. (1976) Senkomplikationer efter sep-tumoperationer. Ugeskrift for Lceger, 138:86–88.Google Scholar
Stoksted, P. (1969) Long-term results, following plastic septum surgery. International Rhinology, 7: 53–61.Google Scholar
Stoksted, P. and Gutierrez, C. (1983) The nasal passage following rhinoplastic surgery. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 97: 49–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed