No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 August 2007
page 834 note * Postscript (July 7, 1929).—Through the courtesy of Sir James Dundas-Grant the speaker has now had the opportunity of examining the section and agrees that it is malignant. This, however, does not alter the argument against biopsy, for, from the further history supplied by Sir James, it would appear that on clinical grounds the only possible diagnosis was one of malignant disease. [T. B. L.].
page 838 note * 1927, xlix., 113.