Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T05:11:28.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhinomanometry evaluation of the effects of pre- and post-operative SMR on exercise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Farhat Nofal  and
Michael Thomas
Farhat Nofal*
Affiliation:
Swindon
Michael Thomas
Affiliation:
Swindon
*
F Nofal F.R.C.S. ENT DepartmentPrincess Alexandra HospitalRAF WroughtonSwindonWiltshire SN4 0QJ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Nasal airway resistance due to uncomplicated DNS was examined in 43 patients, and the results compared with those obtained following corrective surgery. The patients were examined independently by the two authors using a strict examination protocol. Rhinomanometry was carried out pre- and post-operatively at rest and after exercise assessing the worst and the better breathing nostrils separately. The results show that both resting and post-exercise nasal resistance was reduced following septal surgery.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , February 1990 , pp. 126 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clement, P. A. R. (1984) Committee Report on the standardization of Rhinomanometry. Rhinology, 22: 151–155.Google ScholarPubMed
Cura, O., Cunham, O., Atkin, A., Ege, A., Manas, O. (1980) An electro-rhinomanometric study of the effects of forced exertion as an indication to operate. Revue de Laryngologie, 101: (9/10), 455–463.Google Scholar
Eccles, R. (1978) The central rhythm of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngologica, 86: 464–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fayala, H. (1974) Obstruction nasale et sport. Journal Francois Otologie, Rhinologie, Laryngologie, 23: 875–880.Google Scholar
Heetderks, D. L. (1927) Observation of the reaction of normal nasal mucous membrane. American Journal of Medical Science, 1974: 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, N., Seebohm, M. (1968) Nasal airway response to exercise. Journal of Allergy, 41: 269–284.Google Scholar
Stoksted, P. (1953) Rhinometric measurements for determination of nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngologica, Supplementum 109: 176–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed