Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:00:59.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship of acoustic stimulation and tinnitus suppression by electrical stimulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2011

A. Shulman
Affiliation:
(New York)

Extract

Electrical stimulation of the auditory system results in auditory perception as well as auditory suppression. Historically, this is well documented. The recent application of advances of high technology and microsurgery of the ear have allowed basic science and clinical investigation to have access to electrical stimulation of the auditory system and its response. It is historically of great interest that such investigation in the past always involved attempts for evaluation and treatment for either auditory stimulation and/or auditory suppression. I believe the work of Aran (1981) reawakened recent interest in electrical stimulation of the auditory system for tinnitus suppression as well as auditory stimulation. Briefly, in his investigation of a deaf patient, he observed the following: (a) negative currents were more effective than positive currents for auditory stimulation; (b) positive current pulses reduced (suppressed) the intensity of tinnitus; (c) electrical stimulation in deaf patients by negative currents resulted in some sound perception. (In the congenitally deaf patients, it is difficult to evaluate the sensation produced); (d) the intensity of positive pulses necessary to suppress tinnitus is always higher than that of negative pulses resulting in auditory perception; (e) for positive pulses, the range between the threshold of tinnitus suppression and auditory perception when pulses of intermediate intensity are used, without inducing auditory perception, is wide enough to achieve total tinnitus suppression. (In other words, the current effective for electrical stimulation suppressing tinnitus is at a strength well below that producing auditory sensation); (f) negative electrical pulses can produce two different sounds-tinnitus and an auditory sensation; (g) electrical stimulation via the promontory and/or round window can be used both for auditory stimulation as well as for auditory suppression.

Type
Session II. Electrical Stimulation of the Inner Ear (Chairman: J-M. Aran)
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Aran, J.-M. (1981) Electrical stimulation of the auditory system with tinnitus control. Tinnitus Proceedings of the First International Tinnitus Seminar. June 1979. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, Supplement 4: 153162.Google Scholar
2.Fourcin, A., Rosen, S. M., Moore, B. C. J., Douek, E. E., Clark, G. P., Datson, H. N. and Bannister, L. H. (1979) External electrical stimulation of the cochlea: clinical, psychophysical, speech perceptual and histological findings. British Journal of Audiology, 13: 85107.Google Scholar
3.Fourcin, A. J., Douek, E. E., Moore, B. C. J., Rosen, S. M., Walliker, J. R., Howard, D. M., Abberton, E. and Frampton, S. (1983) Speech perception with promontory stimulation. Proceedings, New York Academy of Sciences International Cochlear Prosthesis Conference.Google Scholar
4.House, W. F. (1976) Cochlear implants. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 85: Supplement 27.Google Scholar
5.Moore, B. C. J., Douek, E. E., Fourcin, A. J., Rosen, S. M., Walliker, J. R., Howard, D. M., Abberton, E. and Frampton, S. (1983) Extracochlear electrical stimulation with speech patterns: experience of the EPI Group, UK Artificial Auditory Stimulation, Keidel, W. D. and Finkenzeller, P. (eds.)Google Scholar