Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:26:13.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between conductive hearing loss and maxillary constriction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2014

A A Peyvandi ,
A Jamilian  and
E Moradi
A A Peyvandi
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
A Jamilian*
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics, Craniofacial Centre, Tehran Dental Branch Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
E Moradi
Affiliation:
Department of Orthodontics, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
*
Address for correspondence: Dr A Jamilian, 2713 Vali Asr Street, Tehran 1966843133, Iran Fax: 0098–21–22022215 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the relationship between conductive hearing loss and maxillary constriction.

Method:

A total of 120 people, aged from 7 to 40 years, who were referred to an audiologist when taking out health insurance or for school pre-registration check-up, were selected for this study. A total of 60 participants who had hearing threshold levels greater than 15 dB in both ears were chosen as the conductive hearing loss group. The remaining 60, with normal hearing thresholds of less than 15 dB, were used as the control group. All participants were referred to an orthodontic clinic. Participants who had a posterior crossbite and high palatal vault were considered to suffer from maxillary constriction.

Results:

There were no significant differences between the sex ratios and mean ages of the groups. However, participants with conductive hearing loss were 3.5 times more likely than controls to suffer from maxillary constriction.

Conclusion:

Patients who suffer from conductive hearing loss are likely to show a maxillary abnormality when examined by an orthodontist.

Keywords

Hearing Loss, ConductiveMaxillary ExpansionMalocclusionCrossbite
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 9 , September 2014 , pp. 765 - 767
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Taşpinar, F, Uçuncü, H, Bishara, SE. Rapid maxillary expansion and conductive hearing loss. Angle Orthod 2003;73:669–73Google Scholar
2Braun, F. A contribution to the problem of bronchial asthma and extension of the palatine suture. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 1966;42:361–4Google Scholar
3Laptook, T. Conductive hearing loss and rapid maxillary expansion. Report of a case. Am J Orthod 1981;80:325–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Seto, BH, Gotsopoulos, H, Sims, MR, Cistulli, PA. Maxillary morphology in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Eur J Orthod 2001;23:703–14Google Scholar
5Timms, DJ. A study of basal movement with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod 1980;77:500–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Villano, A, Grampi, B, Fiorentini, R, Gandini, P. Correlations between rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and the auditory apparatus. Angle Orthod 2006;76:752–8Google ScholarPubMed
7Ceylan, I, Oktay, H, Demirci, M. The effect of rapid maxillary expansion on conductive hearing loss. Angle Orthod 1996;66:301–7Google Scholar
8Fingeroth, AI. Orthodontic-orthopedics as related to respiration and conductive hearing loss. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1991;15:83–9Google Scholar
9Bluestone, CD. Studies in otitis media: Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh progress report – 2004. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1–26Google Scholar
10Jury, SC. Prevention of severe mucosecretory ear disease and its complications in patients with cleft lip and palate malformations. Folia Phoniatr Logop 1997;49:177–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Kilic, N, Kiki, A, Oktay, H, Selimoglu, E. Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on conductive hearing loss. Angle Orthod 2008;78:409–14Google Scholar