Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T17:55:34.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Receptive (aural) vocabulary development in children with permanent bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2007

C Kiese-Himmel*
Affiliation:
Department of Phoniatrics/Pedaudiology, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany
*
Address correspondence to: Professor Dr rer nat Dipl-Psych Christiane Kiese-Himmel, Clinical Psychologist, Department of Phoniatrics/Pedaudiology, Georg-August-University Goettingen, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Goettingen, Germany. Fax: 0049 551/392812 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

The receptive (aural) vocabulary development of children with binaural-aided residual hearing was investigated in a prospective longitudinal analysis (repeated measures).

Patient and methods:

Thirty-three children with sensorineural hearing loss, without major co-morbidities (mean age at the first testing point, 56.2 months, standard deviation 19.0 months) were recruited from the 1994 German Goettinger Hearing Language Register. Their receptive vocabulary was measured using standardised tests (with reference to normal hearing child performance) on three separate test points (mean follow up, 18.7 months, standard deviation 5.0 months).

Results:

On average, the study group scored below the normal range at the first and second tests and made a significant improvement at the last test. The degree of hearing loss was found to be significantly correlated to vocabulary performance at all time points, with increasing correlation coefficients. At the third test, significant predictive variables for successful receptive vocabulary outcome were found to be: degree of hearing loss (t = 5.43; p < 0.0001); age at diagnosis (t = 2.29; p = 0.03); and nonverbal intelligence (t = 2.82; p = 0.009).

Conclusion:

If permanent childhood hearing impairment is mild and/or is detected early, and if the child grows up in a monolingual environment, the development of receptive vocabulary within the normal range is possible.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Benedict, H. Early lexical development: comprehension and production. J Child Lang 1979;6:183200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Gupta, P, MacWhinney, B. Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short term memory: computation and neural bases. Brain Lang 1997;59:267333CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Golinkoff, RM, Hirsh-Pasek, K. Word learning. Icon, index, or symbol? In: Golinkoff, RM, Hirsh-Pasek, K, Bloom, L, Smith, LB, Woodward, AL, Akhtar, N, Tomasello, M, Hollich, G, eds. Becoming a Word Learner. A Debate on Lexical Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000;315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Bates, E, Dale, PS, Thal, D. Individual differences and their implications for theories of language development. In: Fletcher, P, MacWhinney, B, eds. The Handbook of Child Language. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1995;96152Google Scholar
5 Marchman, V, Bates, E. Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis. J Child Lang 1994;21:339–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Thal, DJ, Bates, E, Zappia, MJ, Oroz, M. Ties between lexical and grammatical development: evidence from early-talkers. J Child Lang 1996;23:349–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Bishop, DVM, Snowling, MJ. Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: same or different? Psychol Bull 2004;130:858–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Vermeer, A. Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics 2001;22:217–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Moeller, MP, Osberger, MJ, Eccarius, M. Receptive language skills. Monographs of the ASHA 1986;23:4153Google Scholar
10 Ramkalawan, TW, Davis, AC. The effects of hearing loss and age of intervention on some language metrics in young hearing-impaired children. Br J Audiol 1992;26:97107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Mayne, A, Yoshinaga-Itano, C, Sedey, AL. Receptive vocabulary development of infants and toddlers who are deaf or hard of hearing. Volta Rev 2000;100:2952Google Scholar
12 Lederberg, AR, Spencer, PE. Vocabulary development of deaf and hard of hearing children. In: Clark, MD, Marschak, M, Karchmer, M, eds. Context, Cognition, and Deafness. Washinton DC: Gallaudet University Press, 2001;88112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Kiese-Himmel, C, Ohlwein, S. Vocubulary of young children with sensorineural deafness. [in German]. HNO 2002;50:4854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Boothroyd, A, Geers, AE, Moog, JS. Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear Hear 1991; 12(suppl 4):81S89SCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Kirk, KI, Pisoni, DB, Osberger, MJ. Lexical effects of spoken word recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1995;16:470–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Robbins, AM, Svirsky, M, Kirk, KI. Children with implants can speak, but can they communicate? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:155–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17 Szagun, G. Some aspects of language development in normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18:131–4Google ScholarPubMed
18 Szagun, G. Language acquisition in children with cochlear implants; First results of a development psycholinguistic study [in German]. Sprache Stimme Gehör 1998;22:133–8Google Scholar
19 Svirsky, MA, Robbins, AM, Kirk, KI, Pisoni, DB, Miyamoto, RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Science 2000;11:153–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 El-Hakim, H, Levasseur, J, Papsin, BC, Panesar, J, Mount, RJ, Stevens, D et al. Assessment of vocabulary development in children after cochlear implantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1053–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Dawson, PW, Busby, PA, McKay, CM, Clark, GM. Short-term auditory memory in children using cochlear-implants and its relevance to receptive language. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:789801CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 O'Leary Kane, M, Schopmeyer, B, Mellon, NK, Wang, NY, Niparko, JK. Prelinguistic communication and subsequent language acquisition in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:619–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23 Burgemeister, B, Blum, LM, Lorge, I. Columbia Mental Maturity Scale, 3rd edn. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972Google Scholar
24 Eggert, D. The Columbia Mental Maturity Scale as an individually administered instrument for normally developed children from 3 to 10 years old [in German]. In: Eggert, D, ed. Zur Diagnose der Minderbegabung. Beltz: Weinheim, 1992;185201Google Scholar
25 Becker, P, Schaller, S, Schmidtke, A. Coloured Progressive Matrices. Manual of the German version. Weinheim: Beltz, 1980Google Scholar
26 Grimm, H. Language Development Test for Two Years Old [in German]. Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2000Google Scholar
27 Dunn, LM, Dunn, LM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. Circle Pines, Minnesota: American Guidance Service, 1981Google Scholar
28 Hebbel, G, Horn, R. French Pictorial Test of Intelligence [in German]. Weinheim: Beltz, 1976Google Scholar
29 Blamey, PJ, Sarant, JZ, Paatsch, LE, Barry, JG, Bow, CP, Wales, RJ et al. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001;44:264–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Pittman, AL, Lewis, DE, Hoover, BM, Stelmachowicz, PG. Rapid word-learning in normal hearing and hearing-impaired children: effects of age, receptive vocabulary, and high-frequency amplification. Ear Hear 2005;6:619–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Davis, JM, Elfenbein, J, Schum, R, Bentler, RA. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. J Speech Hear Disord 1986;51:5362CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Gilbertson, M, Kamhi, A. Novel word learning in children with hearing impairment. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:630–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Yoshinaga-Itano, C, Sedey, AL, Coulter, DK, Mehl, AL. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34 Yoshinaga-Itano, C. Early identification: an opportunity and challenge for audiology. Semin Hear 1999;20:317–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Kennedy, CR, McCann, DC, Campbell, MJ, Law, CM, Mullee, M, Petrou, S et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2131–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36 Neumann, K, Gross, M, Böttcher, P, Euler, HA, Spormann-Lagodzinski, M, Polzer, M. Effectiveness and efficiency of a universal newborn hearing screening in Germany. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2006;58:440–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Huttenlocher, J. Language input and language growth. Prev Med 1998;27:195–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38 Dromi, E. Early lexical development. In: Barrett, M, ed. The Development of Language: Studies in Development Psychology. Philadelphia: Psychology Press, 1999;99131Google Scholar
39 Kennedy, CR. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment: coverage, positive predictive value, effect on mothers and incremental yield. Wessex Universal Neonatal Screening Trial Group. Acta Paediatr Suppl 1999;88:73–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Thompson, DC, McPhillips, H, Davis, RL, Lieu, TL, Homer, CJ, Helfand, M. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA 2001;286:2000–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41 Yoshinaga-Itano, C, Coulter, D, Thompson, V. The Colorado Newborn Hearing Screening Project: effects on speech and language development for children with hearing loss. J Perinatol 2000;20:S132–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42 Kennedy, C, McCann, D. Universal neonatal hearing screening moving from evidence to practice. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F378–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed