Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:33:09.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Physiological and Pathological Relations between the Nose and the Sexual Apparatus of Man1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

John Noland Mackenzie
Affiliation:
Clinical Professor of Laryngology and Rhinology in the Johns Hopkins Medical School, and Laryngologist to the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1898

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 An old inscription found in the Campus Floræ in Rome. See Buecheler's, Anthol. Latin. Carmen. Epigraphic,” Fasc. II., p. 705, No. 1499, Teubner edit., 1897Google Scholar. Also “Corpus Inscript. Latin.,” VI., 15258, Gruter 615, 11. Orelli 4816, etc. It is attributed, however, by Scaliger to a modern poet.

3 The supposed Greek original. See Antholog. Palatin.” X., 112.Google Scholar

4 Aristot, . “Opera omnia Grasco-Latin.” Parisiis, 1854. “De animalium generatione,” lib. ii., cap.Google Scholar

5 Opera omnia. Ed. Kuhn, Lipsiæ, 1827, torn, i., p. 562.Google Scholar

6 “Ordo et methodus generatione dicatarum partium, per anatomen, cognoscendi fabricam”. Jenæ, 1664, part i., cap. vii., p. 32.Google Scholar

7 Op. cit., “De animal, historia,” lib. vii., cap. i.Google Scholar

Choking sensations in the throat and other hysterical manifestations have from time immemorial been regarded as signs of pregnancy. Shakespeare, in “King Lear” (Sc. ii., Act iv.), thus gives expression to this idea:

“O. how this mother swells up towards my heart! Hysterica passio! down, thou climbing sorrow, Thy element's below.”

8 Op. cit., “De animal, generatione,” lib. v., cap. 7.Google Scholar

9 Riolani, J.Anthropographiæ,” lib. ii., cap. 34, p. 303Google Scholar, Francofurti, 1626. Riolanus quotes from the “Musæum” of Albertus Magnus the case of a girl, sent to fetch wine from a public-house, who was seized and ravished on the road, and who found in attempting to sing on her return that her voice had changed from acute to grave.

See also Martial (lib. ix., Epig. 28): “Jam pædegogo liberatus et cujus Refibulavit turgidum faber penem.”

Also lib. xiv., Epig. 215: “Dic mihi, simplicitur, comœdis et cithædis Fibula quid præstet? Carius ut futuant.”

See also Juvenal, sat. vi., 73

10 Martial, Epig., lib. i., xcv., ad Æglen fellatricem.Google Scholar

11 Epithal, . “Pelei et Thetidos,” lxiv. Catulli op. omn., Lond., 1882, p. 230.Google Scholar This phenomenon was variously attributed to the dilatation of the vessels of the neck by the semen, a portion of which, according to the Hippocratic doctrine, flowed down from the brain during intercourse, and to the general agitation of the vascular system, and especially the arterial and venous trunks of the throat, during the excitement of the sexual act.

12 “Contribution à l'étude du tissu érectile desfossesnasales.” “Thèse de Lyon,” août, 1887.Google Scholar

13 “Progrès Médical,” sept. 10 et 17, 1887. “Du tissu erectile des fosses nasales.”Google Scholar

14 “Revue mensuelle de laryngologie, d'otologie, et de rhinologie,” févr. et mars, 1888 “De l'épistaxis génitale.”.Google Scholar

15 “Ueber nervös. Schnupfen u. Speichelfluss u. den ätiologischen Zusammenhang derselben mit Erkrankungen des Sexualapparates.” “Munchener Med. Woch.,” Jahrgang 1889, No. 4.Google Scholar

16 “Ueber die bisherigen Beobachtungen von der Oberen Luftwege zu den Sexualorganen.“ InGoogle Scholar

17 Die Beziehungen zwischen Nase u. weiblicben Geschlechtsorganen.” Berlin, 1897.Google Scholar

18 Susrutas Ayurvédas: id est Medicinas Systema, a venerabili D'hanvantare demonstratum a suo discipulo compositum.” Translated from the Sanscrit into Latin by Hessler, Franciscus, Erlangen, torn, iii., cap. xxiv., p. 44, 1850.Google Scholar

19 See especially Ludwig Septalius: “De Naevis tractatus,” sect. 26, p. 18, in Bonet's “Labarynthi medic, extricati, etc.” Genevæ, 1687.Google Scholar

20 Vide Ælius Lampridius in “Vitâ Antonii Heliogabilis,” in Hist. August, etc. Beponti.Google Scholar

21 Guidonis Pancirolli rerum memorabilium sive deperditarum pars prior, etc.” Francofurti, 1646, lib. 2, tit. 10, p. m. 176.Google Scholar

22 Guidonis Pancirolli rerum memorabilium sive deperditarum pars prior, etc.” Francofurti, 1646, lib. 2, tit. 10, p. 177.Google Scholar

23 Observat. medico-physiog.” cent, i., obs. xcvii., p. m. 141. Lipsiæ, 1706.Google Scholar

24 Vasatus, post-classical.Google Scholar

25 Virgil, , “ÆEneid”, vi., 497.Google Scholar

26 Vide Diodorus Siculus in “Bibliothecæ Historicæ.” Paris edition, 1854, tom, i., lib. i., cap. lxxvii. (5), p. 64. On the Customs and Laws of the Egyptians.Google Scholar

27 “L'Art de Connoistre les Hommes.” Amsterdam, chez Jacques le Jeune, 1660. De la metoposcopie, p. 259.Google Scholar

28 Life and Times of William Lilly, written by himself. London, 1829.Google Scholar

29 Part ii., canto iii., 285. Bartholini (“Anatomica Reformata de naso”) also Lond. ed., bk. in., chap, x., p. 150 tells us that Michael Scotus pretended to be able to diagnosticate virginity by touching the cartilage of the nose.Google Scholar

30 Fortunus Licetus (Jean Palfyn), “Description anatomique des parties de la femrae, etc., avec un traité des monstres.” Leiden, 1708, lib. ii., chap. 30, pp. 142 and 144.Google Scholar

31 Nat. His.,” lib. vii., cap. 7.Google Scholar

32 Op. omn.” Ed. Kuhn, . Lipsia. 1827, torn, ii.. p. 174Google Scholar. “De morbis” lib. it, and Aph, sect, 5, art. 33.Google Scholar

33 De medicina.” Rolterodami, 1750, lib. ii., cap. 8.Google Scholar

34 “Curationum medicinalium,” cent iv., cur. 4. Venet. 1557Google Scholar. See also Rahn, . “Exercit. phys, de causis physicis miræ illius turn in homine, turn inter homines, turn denique inter cetera naturæ corpora sympathia,” xvii., Turici, 1788.Google Scholar

35 “Sepulehretum.” L. i., s. xx.Google Scholar

36 Historiarum anatomic, et medic, rariorum,” cent. v. et vi., ed. Hafniæ, , 1761, v., p. 184.Google Scholar

37 “Observations rares de médecine, etc.” (quoted by Deschamps, Traité des maladies des fosses nasales et leur sinus”). Paris, 1804, p. 88.Google Scholar

38 Gynaecologia historico-medica, etc.” Dresden and Leipsic, 1730, p. 429.Google Scholar

39 Physiologische u. pathologische Zeichenlehre, etc.” Jena, 1801, p. 122.Google Scholar

40 Physiologische u. pathologische Zeichenlehre, etc.” Jena, 1801, p. 327.Google Scholar Several of the older writers refer to a case of “pituitous and serous catarrh” from coitus, reported by Georg Wolfgang Wedel (see Schurig, , “Spermatologia historicomedica, etc.,” Francofurti ad Mœnum., 1720, p. 280Google Scholar), but I have been unable to obtain the original account of the case. Wepfer, John Jacob, “Observations medico-practicae de affectibus capitis internis et externis,” Schaphusii, 1728, obs. lvii.Google Scholar (see my essay, “The Pathological Nasal Reflex, an Historical Study,” “Transactions of the American Laryngological Association, 1887”; also “N. Y. Medical Journal,” August 20th, 1887), mentions a case of hemicrania, tinnitus aurium, and vertigo associated with uterine trouble, sneezing, and a nasal discharge, but few particulars are given.

It is interesting in this connection to recall the admonition of Celsus to abstain from warmth and women at the commencement of an ordinary catarrh. (Op. cit., lib. iv,, cap. 2, sect. 4, “ubi aliquid ejusmodi sentimus, protinus abstinere a sole, a (balneo, a venere debemus.”) Hippocrates, on the other hand, relates the following case: “Timochari hieme distillatione in nares præcipue vexato, post veneris usum cuncta ressicata sum, lassitudo, calor et capitis gravitas successit, sudor ex capite multus manabat.” Op. cit., “De morbis vulgaribus,” lib. v. (tom. iii., p. 574). The expression “bride's cold” would seem to indicate on the part of the laity the suspicion of a causal connection between repeated sexual excitement and coryza.

41 Ephemerid. nat. cur.,” Dec. ii., An, viii., obs. 152.Google Scholar

42 Ephemerid. nat. cur.,” Dec. iii., An, ii., obs. 32.Google Scholar

43 Act. nat. cur., vol. viii., obs. 108.Google Scholar

44 Ephemerid. nat. cur.,” Dec. iii., An. v., vi., obs. 183Google Scholar. See also Rahn, , op. cit., p. 34.Google Scholar

45 Op. cit., cent, iv., cap. xlviii.Google Scholar

46 Archiv fur Psych.,” Bd. viii. Heft 2.Google Scholar

47 See Elsberg, , “Archives of Laryngology,” Oct., 1883.Google Scholar

48 See especially a work by Bernard, Leopold, “Les odeurs dans les romans de Zola.” Montpelier, 1889.Google Scholar

50 Millingen, . “The Passions, or Mind and Matter, etc.” London, 1848, p. 102.Google Scholar

50 Contribution to the Study of Coryza Vaso-motoria Periodica, or so-called ‘Hay Fever.’” “N. Y. Med. Rec,” 07 19, 1884.Google Scholar

51 Comment, de rebus in med. etc.,” vol. xviii., p. 213.Google Scholar

52 Loc. cit.Google Scholar

53 See case of Lemarchand de Trigon girl of 16, quoted by Joal.Google Scholar

54 Loc. cit.Google Scholar