Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:50:41.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photobiomodulation therapy for tinnitus, primary care triage using the head and neck cancer risk calculator, and rhinitis medicamentosa management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

The British Tinnitus Association estimates that around one in eight people live with persistent tinnitus in the UK, which can significantly impair quality of life.Reference Tailor, Thompson, Nunney, Agius and Phillips1,Reference Zhang, Xu, Caimino and Baguley2 Photobiomodulation therapy enables focused, non-invasive delivery of light therapy to the inner ear. A systematic review in this month's issue of The Journal of Laryngology & Otology seeks to establish outcomes following photobiomodulation therapy for tinnitus in humans and animal studies.Reference Nikookam, Zia, Lotfallah, Muzaffar, Davis-Manders and Kullar3 Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting outcomes in 1483 humans (26 studies) and 34 animals (2 studies). Overall, there was a trend towards short-term benefit from photobiomodulation therapy in both the animal and human studies, despite variations in parameters of delivery, duration, power, wavelength or animal species. However, few studies were able to demonstrate sustained and longer-term improvement at follow up. Future studies with longer-term follow up will allow researchers to assess the longer-term effects and complications of photobiomodulation therapy. It is also recommended that further robust trials with consistency in terms of photobiomodulation therapy parameters, tinnitus assessment tools and follow-up period are essential for the evaluation of photobiomodulation therapy in the management of tinnitus.

There is a drive to cut National Health Service waiting lists.Reference Mahase4 A study by Tan et al. in this month's issue assesses the impact of primary care triage using the Head and Neck Cancer Risk Calculator version 2 on tertiary head and neck services in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 period.Reference Tan, Callaghan, Lewthwaite, Chan, Wee and To5 The head and neck cancer risk calculator is a statistical model designed to help predict an individual's risk of head and neck cancer by generating a percentage risk score based on symptoms, demographics and lifestyle factors.Reference Li, Tikka, Morton, Chan, Hayois and Henderson6 Such calculators can help to target patients appropriately to specialist assessment, rapid diagnosis and early management.

Rhinitis medicamentosa is defined as a drug-induced, non-allergic form of rhinitis that is associated with the prolonged use of topical vasoconstrictors (nasal decongestants) and can be a challenging condition to treat. Margulis et al. in this month's issue have compared two treatment strategies for the condition: medical therapy versus surgical therapy by inferior turbinate reduction.Reference Margulis, Jrbashyan, Bitterman Fisher, Feibish, Stein and Cohen-Kerem7 Forty-seven patients were included: 21 patients were treated with medical therapy and 26 underwent surgical treatment with turbinate reduction. Compared with medical therapy, inferior turbinate reduction for rhinitis medicamentosa resulted in reduced decongestant use and improved quality of life. The work of Margulis et al. supports the findings of a recent study which also concluded that surgically re-establishing a nasal airway was associated with long-term decongestant cessation and symptom improvement in medically refractory rhinitis medicamentosa.Reference Li, Misra, Harvey and Kalish8 Although this was a retrospective study and has some limitations, it does provide an impetus for further randomised controlled trials in the field comparing medical treatments to primary surgery, as well as providing a stimulus for future trials comparing different forms of medical treatments, optimal protocols of medical therapy for rhinitis medicamentosa and identifying prognostic parameters for treatment failure.

References

Tailor, BV, Thompson, RE, Nunney, I, Agius, M, Phillips, JS. Suicidal ideation in people with tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol 2021;19Google Scholar
Zhang, D, Xu, Q, Caimino, C, Baguley, DM. The prevalence of tinnitus in China: a systematic review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol 2021;135:3910.1017/S002221512000256XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikookam, Y, Zia, N, Lotfallah, A, Muzaffar, J, Davis-Manders, J, Kullar, P et al. The effect of photobiomodulation on tinnitus: a systematic review. J Laryngol Otol 2023;138:710–31Google Scholar
Mahase, E. NHS waiting list numbers fall but patients ‘struggle to receive timely care,’ leaders warn. BMJ 2024;384:q8410.1136/bmj.q84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, JY, Callaghan, CJ, Lewthwaite, AW, Chan, CCH, Wee, CT, To, EYH et al. Impact of primary care triage using the Head and Neck Cancer Risk Calculator version 2 on tertiary head and neck services in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 period. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:760–5Google Scholar
Li, L, Tikka, T, Morton, C, Chan, C, Hayois, L, Henderson, M et al. Primary care triaging of head and neck cancer referrals using the head and neck cancer risk calculator version 2: impact on a tertiary head and neck service. J Laryngol Otol 2023;137:763–810.1017/S002221512200192XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margulis, I, Jrbashyan, J, Bitterman Fisher, S, Feibish, N, Stein, N, Cohen-Kerem, R. Rhinitis medicamentosa – comparing two treatment strategies: a retrospective analysis. J Laryngol Otol 2024;138:775–81Google Scholar
Li, W, Misra, S, Harvey, RJ, Kalish, L. Long-term treatment outcomes in refractory rhinitis medicamentosa managed with nasal surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024;14:630–810.1002/alr.23240CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed