Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:06:41.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patient quality of life with bone-anchored hearing aid: 10-year experience in Glasgow, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2009

A T M Mace ,
A Isa  and
L D Cooke
A T M Mace*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, UK
A Isa
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
L D Cooke
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr A Mace, 124 Novar Drive, Hyndland, Glasgow G12 9SY, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

This study aimed to ascertain the usefulness of the bone-anchored hearing aid and its impact on the quality of life of patients fitted in Glasgow between 1996 and 2006.

Method:

The Entific Medical Systems questionnaire and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory were posted to patients in order to assess their satisfaction and quality of life changes.

Results:

Sixty adult patients were identified, with a questionnaire response rate of 63 per cent. Thirty-two respondents (85 per cent) reported using their bone-anchored hearing aid for more than eight hours per day. Twenty-nine respondents (75 per cent) found their bone-anchored hearing aid to be generally better than their previous, conventional aid. Twenty-seven respondents (71 per cent) reported that their bone-anchored hearing aid improved their quality of life. The median total Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was +33.3.

Conclusions:

Bone-anchored hearing aid usage rates and satisfaction levels were high amongst patients in Glasgow. Glasgow Benefit Inventory indices were comparable to published findings from other centres. Despite this, bone-anchored hearing aid funding is still not universally available within the National Health Service in Scotland.

Keywords

Hearing AidsQuality Of LifeImplants And ProsthesesGreat Britain
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 964 - 968
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hakansson, B, Liden, G, Tjellstrom, A, Ringdahl, A, Jacobsson, M, Carlsson, P et al. Ten years of experience with the Swedish bone-anchored hearing system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99:1–16Google Scholar
2 Tjellstrom, A, Hakansson, B. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995;28:53–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Powell, RH, Burrell, SP, Cooper, HR, Proops, DW. The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: paediatric experience and results. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110:21–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Dutt, SN, McDermott, AL, Jelbert, A, Reid, AP, Proops, DW. Day to day use and service-related issues with the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Entific Medical Systems questionnaire. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:20–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Wade, PS, Halik, JJ, Werger, JP, Vosu, LK. Ten-year experience with percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: a 3- to 10-year follow-up Markham Stouffville Hospital, 1990 to 2000. J Otolaryngol 2002;31:80–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Badran, K, Bunstone, D, Arya, AK, Suryanarayanan, R, Mackinnon, N. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:659–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Robinson, K, Gatehouse, S, Browning, GG. Measuring patient benefit from otorhinolaryngological surgery and therapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:415–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Browning, GG, Gatehouse, S. Estimation of the benefit of bone-anchored hearing aids. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103:872–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Department of Health. Transforming Adult Hearing Services for Patients with Hearing Difficulty. A Good Practice Guide. COI, London, 2007Google Scholar
10 Dutt, SN, McDermott, AL, Burrell, SP, Cooper, HR, Reid, AP, Proops, DW. Patient satisfaction with bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids: the Birmingham experience. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Lustig, LR, Arts, HA, Brackmann, DE, Francis, HF, Molony, T, Megerian, CA et al. Hearing rehabilitation using the BAHA bone-anchored hearing aid: results in 40 patients. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:328–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Wazen, JJ, Caruso, M, Tjellstrom, A. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience. Am J Otol 1998;19:737–41Google ScholarPubMed
13 Arunachalam, PS, Kilby, D, Meikle, D, Davison, T, Johnson, IJ. Bone-anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1260–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed