Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:26:44.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrow band imaging versus autofluorescence imaging for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma detection: a prospective study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2016

X-G Ni ,
Q-Q Zhang  and
G-Q Wang
X-G Ni*
Affiliation:
Department of Endoscopy, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
Q-Q Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Endoscopy, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
G-Q Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Endoscopy, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
*
Address for correspondence: Dr X-G Ni, Department of Endoscopy, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, P.O. Box 2258, Beijing 100021, PR China. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of narrow band imaging and autofluorescence imaging for malignant laryngopharyngeal tumours.

Methods:

Between May 2010 and October 2010, 50 consecutive patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal tumour underwent endoscopic laryngopharynx examination. The morphological characteristics of laryngopharyngeal lesions were analysed using high performance endoscopic systems equipped with narrow band imaging and autofluorescence imaging modes. The diagnostic effectiveness of white light image, narrow band imaging and autofluorescence imaging endoscopy for benign and malignant laryngopharyngeal lesions was evaluated.

Results:

Under narrow band imaging endoscopy, the superficial microvessels of squamous cell carcinomas appeared as dark brown spots or twisted cords. Under autofluorescence imaging endoscopy, malignant lesions appeared as bright purple. The sensitivity of malignant lesion diagnosis was not significantly different between narrow band imaging and autofluorescence imaging modes, but was better than for white light image endoscopy (χ2 = 12.676, p = 0.002). The diagnostic specificity was significantly better in narrow band imaging mode than in both autofluorescence imaging and white light imaging mode (χ2 = 8.333, p = 0.016).

Conclusion:

Narrow band imaging endoscopy is the best option for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal tumours.

Keywords

Narrow Band ImagingOptical ImagingLaryngoscopyEarly DiagnosisSquamous Cell CarcinomaHead and Neck
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 130 , Issue 11 , November 2016 , pp. 1001 - 1006
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Subramanian, V, Ragunath, K. Advanced endoscopic imaging: a review of commercially available technologies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;12:368–76.e1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Cho, JH. Advanced imaging technology other than narrow band imaging. Clin Endosc 2015;48:503–10Google Scholar
3 Awan, KH, Patil, S. Efficacy of autofluorescence imaging as an adjunctive technique for examination and detection of oral potentially malignant disorders: a systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16:744–9Google Scholar
4 Ni, XG, Wang, GQ. The role of narrow band imaging in head and neck cancers. Curr Oncol Rep 2016;18:10 Google Scholar
5 Ni, XG, He, S, Xu, ZG, Gao, L, Lu, N, Yuan, Z et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of laryngeal cancer and precancerous lesions by narrow band imaging. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:288–96Google Scholar
6 Balasubramaniam, AM, Sriraman, R, Sindhuja, P, Mohideen, K, Parameswar, RA, Muhamed Haris, KT. Autofluorescence based diagnostic techniques for oral cancer. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(Suppl 2):S374–7Google Scholar
7 Shi, J, Jin, N, Li, Y, Wei, S, Xu, L. Clinical study of autofluorescence imaging combined with band imaging in diagnosing early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions. J BUON 2015;20:1215–22Google ScholarPubMed
8 Gono, K. Narrow band imaging: technology basis and research and development history. Clin Endosc 2015;48:476–80Google Scholar
9 Gono, K, Obi, T, Yamaguchi, M, Ohyama, N, Machida, H, Sano, Y et al. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt 2004;9:568–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 ASGE Technology Committee, Song, LM, Adler, DG, Conway, JD, Diehl, DL, Farraye, FA et al. Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:581–9Google Scholar
11 Emura, F, Saito, Y, Ikematsu, H. Narrow-band imaging optical chromocolonoscopy: advantages and limitations. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14:4867–72Google Scholar
12 Inoue, H, Kaga, M, Ikeda, H, Sato, C, Sato, H, Minami, H et al. Magnification endoscopy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a review of the intrapapillary capillary loop classification. Ann Gastroenterol 2015;28:41–8Google Scholar
13 He, Q, Wang, Q, Wu, Q, Feng, J, Cao, J, Chen, BY. Value of autofluorescence imaging videobronchoscopy in detecting lung cancers and precancerous lesions: a review. Respir Care 2013;58:2150–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Zaric, B, Perin, B, Becker, HD, Herth, FF, Eberhardt, R, Djuric, M et al. Autofluorescence imaging videobronchoscopy in the detection of lung cancer: from research tool to everyday procedure. Expert Rev Med Devices 2011;8:167–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Zaric, B, Becker, HD, Perin, B, Stojanovic, G, Jovelic, A, Eri, Z et al. Autofluorescence imaging videobronchoscopy improves assessment of tumor margins and affects therapeutic strategy in central lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2010;40:139–45Google Scholar
16 Folkman, J, Watson, K, Ingber, D, Hanahan, D. Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia. Nature 1989;339:58–61 Google Scholar