Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:36:37.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multicentre prospective clinical application of the T14 paediatric outcome tool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2015

C Hopkins
Affiliation:
Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
R Almeyda
Affiliation:
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
H Alreefy
Affiliation:
Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
H Ismail-Koch
Affiliation:
Southampton Hospital, Gillingham, UK
J Lim
Affiliation:
Medway Maritime Hospital, Gillingham, UK
V Possamai
Affiliation:
Birmingham Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
S Powell
Affiliation:
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
R Sharma
Affiliation:
Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK
I Hore*
Affiliation:
Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Trust, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr I Hore, c/o ENT Secretaries, Evelina London Children's Hospital at St Thomas’ Hospital Westminster Bridge Road, London SE1 7EH, UK Fax: +44 2071882192 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to measure changes in disease-specific quality of life in children following tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy.

Methods:

A multicentre prospective cohort study was performed involving seven ENT departments in England. A total of 276 children entered the study over a 2-month period: 107 underwent tonsillectomy and 128 adenotonsillectomy. Forty-one children referred with throat problems initially managed by watchful waiting were also recruited. The follow-up period was 12 months. Outcome measures were the T14, parental impressions of their child's quality of life and the number of days absent from school.

Results:

One-year follow-up data were obtained from 150 patients (52 per cent). The mean baseline T14 score in the non-surgical group was significantly lower (T14 = 23) than in the tonsillectomy group (T14 = 31) or the adenotonsillectomy group (T14 = 35; p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in the T14 scores of responders in all groups at follow up. The effect size was 1.3 standard deviations (SD) for the non-surgical group, 2.1 SD for the tonsillectomy group and 1.9 SD for the adenotonsillectomy group. Between-group differences did not reach statistical significance. A third of children in the non-surgical group underwent surgery during the follow-up period.

Conclusion:

Children who underwent surgical intervention achieved a significant improvement in disease-specific quality of life. Less severely affected children were managed conservatively and also improved over 12 months, but 1 in 3 crossed over to surgical intervention.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Preliminary study data were presented in the short papers section of the British Association of Paediatric Otolaryngology Annual Meeting, 21 September 2012, Sheffield, UK

References

1Lau, AS, Upile, NS, Wilkie, MD, Leong, SC, Swift, AC. Rising rates of admissions for tonsillitis and neck space abscesses in England, 1991–2011. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014;96:307–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Is access to surgery a postcode lottery? Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2014. In: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news/docs/Is%20access%20to%20surgery%20a%20postcode%20lottery.pdf [18 July 2014]Google Scholar
3NHS Atlas of Variation in Healthcare for Children and Young Adults, 2012. RightCare. In: http://www.rightcare.nhs.uk/index.php/atlas/children-and-young-adults/ [18 July 2014]Google Scholar
4Indications for tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy in children. A joint position paper of the Paediatric and Child Health Division of the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and The Australasian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2008. In: http://www.racp.edu.au/index.cfm?objectid=B5637C7B-E823-E407-E65AB8D6F27A07BD [18 July 2014]Google Scholar
5Hopkins, C, Fairley, J, Yung, M, Hore, I, Balasubramaniam, S, Haggard, M, The 14-item Paediatric Throat Disorders Outcome Test: a valid, sensitive, reliable, parent-reported outcome measure for paediatric throat disorders. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:306–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy in Children with Sleep Disordered Breathing Disorders. Consensus Statement of a UK Multidisciplinary Working Party Royal College of Anesthetists, Sept 2008. In: http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/document-store/tonsillectomy-and-adenoidectomy-children-sleep-related-breathing-disorders [18 July 2014]Google Scholar
7Burton, MJ, Glsziou, PP. Tonsillectomy or adeno-tonsillectomy versus non-surgical treatment for chronic/recurrent acute tonsillitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):CD001802Google Scholar
8Blakley, BW, Magit, AE. The role of tonsillectomy in reducing recurrent pharyngitis: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:291–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Brietzke, S, Gallagher, D, The effectiveness of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy in the treatment of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome: a meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:979–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Schwentner, I, Schmutzhard, J, Schwentner, C, Abraham, I, Hofer, S, Sprinzl, GM. The impact of adenotonsillectomy on children's quality of life. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:56–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Goldstein, NA, Witsell, DL, Hannley, MT, Weaver, EM, Yueh, B, Smith, TL et al. Quality of life after tonsillectomy in children with recurrent tonsillitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;138:S9S16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Lock, C, Wilson, J, Steen, N, Eccles, M, Mason, H, Carrie, S et al. North of England and Scotland Study of Tonsillectomy and Adeno-tonsillectomy in Children (NESSTAC): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a parallel non-randomised preference study. Health Technol Assess 2010;14:1190Google ScholarPubMed
13Cook, JA. The challenge faced in the design, conduct and analysis of surgical randomised controlled trials. Trials 2009;10:9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed