Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:17:11.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of occult primary: beware the tonsillar remnant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2007

R Simo*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
M O'Connell
Affiliation:
Department of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Ricard Simo, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 3rd Floor, Thomas Guy House, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK. Fax: 020 7188 2206 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma to the neck with an occult primary is a recognised clinical and pathological entity. Despite well established diagnostic protocols, this condition still represents a management challenge.

Case report:

We report the case of a 46-year-old man who presented with metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. He had undergone tonsillectomy as a child. The only abnormal finding was the presence of a tonsillar remnant, which harboured the primary carcinoma.

Conclusion:

According to our literature search, this is the only recorded case in which the index tumour was found in a tonsillar remnant. This case illustrates the importance of thorough clinical examination in patients with potential unknown primaries, and of the need, in previously tonsillectomised patients, to perform excisional biopsy of the tonsillar remnant.

Type
Clinical Record
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists Head and Neck Surgeons. Effective Head and Neck Cancer Management. Third Consensus Document 2002. London: British Association of Otorhinolaryngologists Head and Neck Surgeons, 2002Google Scholar
2 Hardwick, RD. Cervical metastases from an occult primary site. Sem Surg Oncol 1991;7:28Google Scholar
3 Jones, AS, Cook, JA, Phillips, DE, Roland, NR. Squamous carcinoma presenting as an enlarged cervical lymph node. Cancer 1993;72:1756–613.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Mendelhall, VM, Mancuso, AA, Parsons, JT, Stringer, SP, Cassisi, NJ. Diagnostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary site. Head Neck 1998;20:739–44Google Scholar
5 Righi, P, Sofferman, R. Screening unilateral tonsillectomy in the unknown primary. Laryngoscope 1995;105:548–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Wong, WL, Saunders, M. The impact of FDG PET on the management of occult primary head and neck tumours. Clin Oncol 2003;15:461–6Google Scholar
7 Martin, H, Romieu, C. The diagnostic significance of a ‘lump in the neck’. Postgrad Med J 1952;11:491500Google Scholar
8 Ellis, ER, Mendenhall, WM, Rao, PV, McCarty, PJ, Parsons, JT, Stringer, SP et al. Incisional or excisional neck-node biopsy before definitive radiotherapy, alone or followed by neck dissection. Head Neck 1990;13:177–83Google Scholar
9 Richards, BL, Spiro, JD. Controlling advanced neck disease: efficacy of neck dissection and radiotherapy. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1124–7Google Scholar
10 Jackson, SM, Hay, JH, Flores, AD, Weir, L, Wong, FLW, Schwindt, C et al. Cancer of the tonsil: the results of ipsilateral radiation treatment. Radiother Oncol 1999;51:123–8Google Scholar
11 Mendelhall, WM, Mancuso, AA, Amdur, RJ, Villaret, DB, Cassisi, NJ. Squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the neck from an unknown head and neck primary site. Am J Otolaryngol 2001;22:261–7Google Scholar
12 Buckley, JG, Feber, T. Surgical treatment of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: evaluation of the evidence for modifications of neck dissection. Head Neck 2001;23:907–15Google Scholar