Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T16:54:39.736Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of different modes of administration of cream in the treatment of otomycosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2024

Lei Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College & School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
Xue-Meng Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College & School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
Bi-Yao Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College & School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
Jing Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College & School of Clinical Medicine, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
Da-Zhong Yan*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China
*
Corresponding author: Da-Zhong Yan; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of two different modes of administration, external ear canal filling and smearing, in the treatment of otomycosis.

Methods

A computerised search of relevant published studies in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases that include randomised controlled trials or clinically controlled trials on the same drug in different modes of administration for the treatment of otomycosis.

Results

Seven studies with 934 patients were included. The filled group had a higher clinical efficacy (relative risk = 1.18, 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.24, p < 0.0001) and a lower recurrence rate (relative risk = 0.29, 95 per cent CI 0.18–0.47, p < 0.0001) compared with the smear group, and there was no significant difference in the adverse effects (relative risk = 0.61, 95 per cent CI 0.34–1.12, p = 0.11).

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that the efficacy of the delivery modality of the external auditory canal filling treatment is significantly better than external auditory canal smearing.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Da-Zhong Yan takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Tasić-Otašević, S, Golubović, M, Đenić, S, Ignjatović, A, Stalević, M, Momčilović, S, et al. Species distribution patterns and epidemiological characteristics of otomycosis in Southeastern Serbia. J Mycol Med 2020;30(3):101011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, T, Vrabec, JT, Yoo, D, Coker, NJ. Otomycosis: clinical features and treatment implications. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135(5):787–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Q, Chu, H, Tao, Y, Peng, L, Zhou, L, Liu, L et al. A comparison of triamcinolone acetonide econazole cream and nystatin suspension in treatment of otomycosis. Laryngoscope 2021;131(5):E1640–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koltsidopoulos, P, Skoulakis, C. Otomycosis with tympanic membrane perforation: a review of the literature. Ear Nose Throat J 2020;99(8):518–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alarid-Coronel, J, Celis-Aguilar, E, Escobar-Aispuro, L, Muñoz-Estrada, V. Otomycosis in immunocompetent patients: clinical and mycological features. Our experience with 40 cases. Clin Otolaryngol 2018;43(1):373–7Google ScholarPubMed
Stogiannis, D, Siannis, F, Androulakis, E. Heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comprehensive overview. Int J Biostat 2023;20(1):169–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, DH, Ji, SF, Chen, JX, Chen, XH. Clinical observation of different modes of administration of mycotoxin cream in the treatment of fungal otitis externa. China Pharmacy 2014;16(25):1467–8Google Scholar
Li, GY, Xu, DY, Li, CL, Zhao, FL. Preliminary study on the clinical efficacy of otoscopic cleaning combined with parexone external auditory canal irrigation for the treatment of fungal disease of the external auditory canal in children. Chin J Clin Res 2017;7(10):217–9Google Scholar
Zhang, XB, Hu, BH. Observation on the efficacy of injecting Parasone ointment into the external auditory canal for the treatment of fungal otitis externa. Chin J Otorhinolaryngol Integr Med 2017;25(1):2629+8Google Scholar
Wang, XY, Kong, DJ, Zhang, ZD. Effects of different administration modes of Parasone ointment on the efficacy of fungal otitis externa and serum inflammatory factor. Chin J Rational Drug Use 2019;16(9):149151+154.Google Scholar
Li, Y, He, L. Diagnosis and treatment of otomycosis in southern China. Mycoses 2019;62(11):1064–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, YH, Hu, ZY, Lin, HL, Cai, WW, Huang, YL. Analysis of the efficacy of parresone in fungal external otitis. Chin J Endoscopy 2022;28(2):5662Google Scholar
Lou, WR, Zhou, Z, Liu, J. Efficacy of ear endoscopic drug tamponade in treating mycosis of the external auditory canal. Pract Med China 2022;10(17):110–2Google Scholar
Sterne, JAC, Sutton, AJ, Ioannidis, JPA, Terrin, N, Jones, DR, Lau, J et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J 2011;343:d4002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed